Page 2 of 2

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 10:51
by abridged
Done also. Bloody hell, the No's are winning.

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 11:26
by markfiend
Voted "Yes", still on 46%

I see what you mean about the badly-worded question. :urff:

Remember folks, vote early and vote often.

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 12:01
by metal on metal
It's appallingly worded.

Have added my "yes".

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 12:30
by streamline
Another vote added....

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 12:47
by Pista
vote is cast.
Big hugs to Molly, whose cakes are the mutt's nuts.
A legend.
:notworthy: :notworthy:

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 12:51
by DerekR
Voted yes but the no's are winning. Wait til I get back to work, there's a few more PC's there :innocent: :wink:

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 12:53
by Pista
DerekR wrote:Voted yes but the no's are winning. Wait til I get back to work, there's a few more PC's there :innocent: :wink:
To the interweb cafe everyone.
:innocent:

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 12:58
by markfiend
I'm trying to work up a Python script for multiple voting :innocent:

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 15:56
by James Blast
Outstanding team! That'll get you a case of beer. :D

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 16:48
by Obviousman
Diddit!

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 17:58
by Ahráyeph
Done

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 18:02
by James Blast
Ace! :D

Posted: 16 Jan 2010, 19:21
by Pat
Oops, should have read this earlier, done.

Posted: 17 Jan 2010, 02:21
by Andy TG
Done - once i get the blody thing to load!

Posted: 17 Jan 2010, 18:35
by Garbageman
Done

Posted: 18 Jan 2010, 01:44
by Andy Christ 666
Done.

Posted: 18 Jan 2010, 07:58
by Ozpat
markfiend wrote:I'm trying to work up a Python script for multiple voting :innocent:
Long live democracy!

Posted: 18 Jan 2010, 11:10
by timsinister
Well, I voted - but I wonder how much of the lead for the No side is from a badly written question?

Give 'em a written stabbin', sir!

Posted: 18 Jan 2010, 11:26
by markfiend
Python script to add a thousand "Yes" votes :innocent: (Py2.6)

Code: Select all

import urllib
url = ("http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/editor-s-picks-ignore/fury-over-bid-to-ditch-benefit-1.998901?pollId=poll_1_998928&questionId=0&forward=http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk:80/news/editor-s-picks-ignore/fury-over-bid-to-ditch-benefit-1.998901&answerId=0&cookieSet=true#poll")

for a in range (1000):
    sock = urllib.urlopen(url)
    htmlSource = sock.read()
    sock.close()
    print a

Posted: 18 Jan 2010, 12:03
by markfiend
It's still on 46% yes, 50% no, 4% don't know.

Shenanigans?

Posted: 18 Jan 2010, 12:10
by Izzy HaveMercy
markfiend wrote:It's still on 46% yes, 50% no, 4% don't know.

Shenanigans?
The 'no'-voters figured out that script before you mebbies? ;)

IZ.

Posted: 18 Jan 2010, 12:35
by markfiend
I've seen online polls deliberately skewed before, they always go 99.9% one way or another (unless they get millions of votes)

Posted: 18 Jan 2010, 13:43
by James Blast
markfiend wrote:Shenanigans?
yeap with a side order of jiggery pokery I'll wager

Posted: 18 Jan 2010, 15:26
by GC
Being645 wrote:Done that ... however: yes still only 46 % ./. No 50 % ...
I know because I'm voting for No every ten seconds.







Joking my Yes is in there as well.

Posted: 19 Jan 2010, 09:36
by SteBacchus
I've just voted 'Yes' but the results say, YES = 46%, NO = 51%, DON'T KNOW = 4%. That's 101% by my maths HMMM! :urff: