Page 2 of 9

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 11:18
by Erudite
markfiend wrote:For what it's worth, I lost interest about halfway through David Tennant's tenure.
Considering this thread is about Matt Smith, not much! :P :wink:

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 11:42
by streamline
I really enjoyed the first episode. The story wasn't the best, but it was more about introducing the new doctor. I thought there were a few nice nods back to previous Doctors and I liked his more scatty persona until his regeneration settled down and he "became" the Doctor when he was telling the Atraxi off.

Liked Amy Pond as well! Although I can't see us seeing her in a miniskirt again :(

Good start - mind you I have always been a huge fan of Moffatt and I am expecting much more. Although I will not be missing RTD's unsubtle political posturing!

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 20:45
by Big Si
streamline wrote:Liked Amy Pond as well! Although I can't see us seeing her in a miniskirt again :(
Check the various preview vids on youtube - Blink and you'll miss 'em (HOT! pants and tight jeans) :wink: ;D

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 20:51
by Big Si
markfiend wrote:For what it's worth, I lost interest about halfway through David Tennant's tenure.
I started to lose interest during Colin Baker's tenure. Ecclestone's I completely missed because when it was on I was in the pub after the fitba, and I only caught Tennant's because there was nowt else on TV.

But I have to say that I do see a lot of potential in Matt Smith :D

Posted: 07 Apr 2010, 11:49
by timsinister
Reserving judgement on the Eleventh until I've seen more episodes.

The TARDIS refit is bilge though.

Oh, and he got a new screwdriver? I thought they'd finally cured themselves of the Deus Ex Machina addiction - but hell, if it can be merchandised to the hilt, why not?

:roll:

Posted: 07 Apr 2010, 22:17
by Big Si
timsinister wrote:Reserving judgement on the Eleventh until I've seen more episodes.

The TARDIS refit is bilge though.

Oh, and he got a new screwdriver? I thought they'd finally cured themselves of the Deus Ex Machina addiction - but hell, if it can be merchandised to the hilt, why not?

:roll:
Well if you were a kid, what would you prefer? A toy lightsabre or a sonic screwdriver? :wink:

Posted: 07 Apr 2010, 22:18
by weebleswobble
Big Si wrote:
timsinister wrote:Reserving judgement on the Eleventh until I've seen more episodes.

The TARDIS refit is bilge though.

Oh, and he got a new screwdriver? I thought they'd finally cured themselves of the Deus Ex Machina addiction - but hell, if it can be merchandised to the hilt, why not?

:roll:
Well if you were a kid, what would you prefer? A toy lightsabre or a sonic screwdriver? :wink:
A blow up assistant :innocent:

Posted: 08 Apr 2010, 08:37
by markfiend
Big Si wrote:Well if you were a kid, what would you prefer? A toy lightsabre or a sonic screwdriver? :wink:
Well, I've got a lightsaber. An elegant weapon for a more civilised age.

Posted: 08 Apr 2010, 11:06
by timsinister
weebleswobble wrote:
Big Si wrote:
Well if you were a kid, what would you prefer? A toy lightsabre or a sonic screwdriver? :wink:
A blow up assistant :innocent:
Christ, I'd inflate her BUT ANYWAY THAT'S NOT THE QUESTION!

The Doctor shouldn't need fancy gadgets to extricate himself from every situation the scriptwriters can't be arsed thinking of a clever way out of.

I suppose I've become the bitter old fan who forgets there ARE young kids out there who do want bells, whistles and light-up toys!

I'd settle for lighting up Amy Pond GODAMNIT NOT AGAIN...

*quiet lie down time*

Posted: 08 Apr 2010, 11:48
by Norman Hunter
Afraid my interest waned after this guy;

Image

Posted: 08 Apr 2010, 12:07
by DerekR
Got round to watching this last night. Wasnae bad, for a kids program like :P

Bit distracted by the legs, not that I'm complaining :innocent:

Posted: 08 Apr 2010, 12:26
by weebleswobble
DerekR wrote:
Bit distracted by the legs, not that I'm complaining :innocent:
never.missing.an.episode.

Posted: 08 Apr 2010, 18:56
by stufarq
timsinister wrote:The Doctor shouldn't need fancy gadgets to extricate himself from every situation the scriptwriters can't be arsed thinking of a clever way out of.

I suppose I've become the bitter old fan who forgets there ARE young kids out there who do want bells, whistles and light-up toys!
When I was a kid (Tom Baker era) I loved the sonic screwdriver. But then it was just a tool for opening doors, nobbling computers etc. It wasn't the magic wand that it's become now, which can, for God's sake, mend fences and probably whip up a three course meal if you use the right setting. A simple, fun gadget is fine but something that, as you say, stifles creativity and leads to lazy scripting is just wrong.

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 20:45
by timsinister
:notworthy:

Truer word never said! Afraid by the second episode, seems they're not going to let this one go. It's now a tricorder which lets him take all manner of plot-advancing readings, and also induce vomiting in star whales. So you know.

A bad second episode, anyone notice how they glued the 'Smilers' into the plot to make it scarier, but never really explained what they were or where they came from?

Interesting flash of callousness from the Eleventh Doctor, steeling himself to brain-fry the whale...but didn't it occur to him to try and CONVERSE with the big fish?
We've come a long way from the reluctant Fourth Doctor in Genesis of the Daleks, it seems. Still angsting over the fall of the Time Lords for dramatic effect as well - considering he's condemned them already since the show came back, this seems a little cavalier you know?

Also wish they could let us get through the series without the 'cryptic' references to the over-arching plot - notice the 'break' in space-time on Starship UK's hull? Man, take a leaf out of the X-Files book and play it a LOT cooler.

And next week - Daleks. Well fook me if it isn't a whirlwind of new adventures.

:roll:

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 21:46
by bangles
Had previously thought the Tennant was the bee's knee's and utterly irreplacable but was then soundly shown up for the fickle little s**t that I am, by proudly announcing there's only one doctor & his name is Smith (in much the same way as I'd done with the transition from ecceleston!)
Music s**t tho!

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 01:05
by stufarq
timsinister wrote:Man, take a leaf out of the X-Files book and play it a LOT cooler.
You mean make the backstory hideously complicated and impenetrable unless you've watched every episode twelve times and taken notes?

Agree about the Daleks though.

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 08:09
by moses

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 09:15
by markfiend
stufarq wrote:
timsinister wrote:Man, take a leaf out of the X-Files book and play it a LOT cooler.
You mean make the backstory hideously complicated and impenetrable unless you've watched every episode twelve times and taken notes?

Agree about the Daleks though.
Too right. The X-Files imploded under the weight of its own back-story in the end.

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 09:36
by Maisey
My opnion on the last episode (The Beast Below), copied over from a post on LiveJournal:

There seemed to be an incredible lack of... justice to the whole thing.

I mean, they did spend 300 years ruthelessly torturing a sentient being because of a fear of just one possible scenario. Also, Amy made these grand comparisons between the whale and the Doctor, but if the Doctor had been subjugated to that sort of treatment he'd probably have made a good crack at wiping out their entire f**king race in a fit of righteous space policeman fury. Not, in fact, just carry on swimming happily, grateful they finally stopped shooting heat rays directly into his brain.

It's not that I didn't enjoy it, because I did. The heart wrenching battle between survival and humanity was a wonderful concept, but the assumption that ignorance justifies atrocity was hardly a good message.

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 10:56
by weebleswobble
Amy Pond in a nightie

sopping wet

;D

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 13:11
by timsinister
markfiend wrote:
stufarq wrote:
timsinister wrote:Man, take a leaf out of the X-Files book and play it a LOT cooler.
You mean make the backstory hideously complicated and impenetrable unless you've watched every episode twelve times and taken notes?

Agree about the Daleks though.
Too right. The X-Files imploded under the weight of its own back-story in the end.
Hmm, granted it did nosedive...but for me, the achingly-subtle references to the 'arc' were a lot more gratifying than this clumsy, glaringly-obvious technique DW are using.

Mind you, Phono Paul put it best when he said trying to subscribe logic to what is essentially a children's television show will A) not work, and B) make you look like a whinging fanboy. :innocent:
Maisey wrote:...but if the Doctor had been subjugated to that sort of treatment he'd probably have made a good crack at wiping out their entire f**king race in a fit of righteous space policeman fury.
Bloody good point. I suspect the scriptwriters are grappling with making the Eleventh Doctor seem like the "lonely God, last of the Time Lords, serious type" whilst at the same time having him run around like a rubber-faced goon for the children. And making a damn mess of it.

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 16:16
by moses
timsinister wrote:
markfiend wrote:
stufarq wrote: You mean make the backstory hideously complicated and impenetrable unless you've watched every episode twelve times and taken notes?

Agree about the Daleks though.
Too right. The X-Files imploded under the weight of its own back-story in the end.
Hmm, granted it did nosedive...but for me, the achingly-subtle references to the 'arc' were a lot more gratifying than this clumsy, glaringly-obvious technique DW are using.

Mind you, Phono Paul put it best when he said trying to subscribe logic to what is essentially a children's television show will A) not work, and B) make you look like a whinging fanboy. :innocent:
Maisey wrote:...but if the Doctor had been subjugated to that sort of treatment he'd probably have made a good crack at wiping out their entire f**king race in a fit of righteous space policeman fury.
Bloody good point. I suspect the scriptwriters are grappling with making the Eleventh Doctor seem like the "lonely God, last of the Time Lords, serious type" whilst at the same time having him run around like a rubber-faced goon for the children. And making a damn mess of it.
It's not reality, it's just a show. Timelords don't really exist. :roll:

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 16:56
by timsinister
:lol:

You're absolutely right. I don't dispute it for a second.

However, I protest, as I get 'into' things, and become fascinated with the continuity and lore of a fantasy universe, be it Star Trek or Lord of the Rings. Enjoy something for long enough, and you'll get miffed if someone comes along and out of the blue starts to change things, mess with characters, introduce sloppy scriptwriting.

I'm sure you'd react with a bit of passion if someone naffed around with a band you liked...?

And it's written Time Lord. :P :wink:

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 21:40
by stufarq
moses wrote: It's not reality, it's just a show. Timelords don't really exist. :roll:
Only cos the Daleks wiped them out! Show some respect.

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 22:34
by DeWinter
It's hardly likely it's the end for the Time Lords. The Daleks and Cybermen have been ressurected at least twice every season, so if the Doctor is feeling lonely, he only has to wait untill the script-writers run out of ideas again.
I'm interested who's going to be the "Big Bad" for this season though. They've still got the Valeyard, Rani, Omega and the Ice Warriors to bring back.