Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 11:18
Considering this thread is about Matt Smith, not much!markfiend wrote:For what it's worth, I lost interest about halfway through David Tennant's tenure.
Considering this thread is about Matt Smith, not much!markfiend wrote:For what it's worth, I lost interest about halfway through David Tennant's tenure.
Check the various preview vids on youtube - Blink and you'll miss 'em (HOT! pants and tight jeans)streamline wrote:Liked Amy Pond as well! Although I can't see us seeing her in a miniskirt again
I started to lose interest during Colin Baker's tenure. Ecclestone's I completely missed because when it was on I was in the pub after the fitba, and I only caught Tennant's because there was nowt else on TV.markfiend wrote:For what it's worth, I lost interest about halfway through David Tennant's tenure.
Well if you were a kid, what would you prefer? A toy lightsabre or a sonic screwdriver?timsinister wrote:Reserving judgement on the Eleventh until I've seen more episodes.
The TARDIS refit is bilge though.
Oh, and he got a new screwdriver? I thought they'd finally cured themselves of the Deus Ex Machina addiction - but hell, if it can be merchandised to the hilt, why not?
A blow up assistantBig Si wrote:Well if you were a kid, what would you prefer? A toy lightsabre or a sonic screwdriver?timsinister wrote:Reserving judgement on the Eleventh until I've seen more episodes.
The TARDIS refit is bilge though.
Oh, and he got a new screwdriver? I thought they'd finally cured themselves of the Deus Ex Machina addiction - but hell, if it can be merchandised to the hilt, why not?
Well, I've got a lightsaber. An elegant weapon for a more civilised age.Big Si wrote:Well if you were a kid, what would you prefer? A toy lightsabre or a sonic screwdriver?
Christ, I'd inflate her BUT ANYWAY THAT'S NOT THE QUESTION!weebleswobble wrote:A blow up assistantBig Si wrote:
Well if you were a kid, what would you prefer? A toy lightsabre or a sonic screwdriver?
never.missing.an.episode.DerekR wrote:
Bit distracted by the legs, not that I'm complaining
When I was a kid (Tom Baker era) I loved the sonic screwdriver. But then it was just a tool for opening doors, nobbling computers etc. It wasn't the magic wand that it's become now, which can, for God's sake, mend fences and probably whip up a three course meal if you use the right setting. A simple, fun gadget is fine but something that, as you say, stifles creativity and leads to lazy scripting is just wrong.timsinister wrote:The Doctor shouldn't need fancy gadgets to extricate himself from every situation the scriptwriters can't be arsed thinking of a clever way out of.
I suppose I've become the bitter old fan who forgets there ARE young kids out there who do want bells, whistles and light-up toys!
You mean make the backstory hideously complicated and impenetrable unless you've watched every episode twelve times and taken notes?timsinister wrote:Man, take a leaf out of the X-Files book and play it a LOT cooler.
Too right. The X-Files imploded under the weight of its own back-story in the end.stufarq wrote:You mean make the backstory hideously complicated and impenetrable unless you've watched every episode twelve times and taken notes?timsinister wrote:Man, take a leaf out of the X-Files book and play it a LOT cooler.
Agree about the Daleks though.
Hmm, granted it did nosedive...but for me, the achingly-subtle references to the 'arc' were a lot more gratifying than this clumsy, glaringly-obvious technique DW are using.markfiend wrote:Too right. The X-Files imploded under the weight of its own back-story in the end.stufarq wrote:You mean make the backstory hideously complicated and impenetrable unless you've watched every episode twelve times and taken notes?timsinister wrote:Man, take a leaf out of the X-Files book and play it a LOT cooler.
Agree about the Daleks though.
Bloody good point. I suspect the scriptwriters are grappling with making the Eleventh Doctor seem like the "lonely God, last of the Time Lords, serious type" whilst at the same time having him run around like a rubber-faced goon for the children. And making a damn mess of it.Maisey wrote:...but if the Doctor had been subjugated to that sort of treatment he'd probably have made a good crack at wiping out their entire f**king race in a fit of righteous space policeman fury.
It's not reality, it's just a show. Timelords don't really exist.timsinister wrote:Hmm, granted it did nosedive...but for me, the achingly-subtle references to the 'arc' were a lot more gratifying than this clumsy, glaringly-obvious technique DW are using.markfiend wrote:Too right. The X-Files imploded under the weight of its own back-story in the end.stufarq wrote: You mean make the backstory hideously complicated and impenetrable unless you've watched every episode twelve times and taken notes?
Agree about the Daleks though.
Mind you, Phono Paul put it best when he said trying to subscribe logic to what is essentially a children's television show will A) not work, and B) make you look like a whinging fanboy.
Bloody good point. I suspect the scriptwriters are grappling with making the Eleventh Doctor seem like the "lonely God, last of the Time Lords, serious type" whilst at the same time having him run around like a rubber-faced goon for the children. And making a damn mess of it.Maisey wrote:...but if the Doctor had been subjugated to that sort of treatment he'd probably have made a good crack at wiping out their entire f**king race in a fit of righteous space policeman fury.
Only cos the Daleks wiped them out! Show some respect.moses wrote: It's not reality, it's just a show. Timelords don't really exist.