Posted: 15 Jan 2011, 12:03
how to forget BURN in Heineken Music Hall in Amsterdam in 2003?? god, indeed went wrong...
...Page 2 of 2
Posted: 15 Jan 2011, 12:16
... however, followed by one of the few versions of WYDSM, I really like ... ...
...Posted: 15 Jan 2011, 12:25
true, and the first time in ages that doctor jeep was played
Posted: 15 Jan 2011, 13:54
... yeah, and this absolutely great version of Summer ...
Posted: 15 Jan 2011, 14:00
conclusion: Amsterdam 03 wasn´t so bad at all... was it??
Posted: 15 Jan 2011, 19:04
It was a great concert!
Posted: 15 Jan 2011, 21:20
can you point out a link to this last attempt of normal speed Burn? preferably a mp3 one?
Posted: 15 Jan 2011, 21:49
... Taking Requests - Page 3 ...
Re: That tempo is bothering me.
Posted: 16 Jan 2011, 22:39
Say you're in a band for 30 years. Unless you have a repertoire like Motorhead's, I'd imagine that either you shake things up a bit occasionally or else you drive yourself insane. In the case of The Sisters, shaking things up amounts to speeding up some of the slower songs and slowing down some of the faster songs. I can't imagine anything more soul-destroying than churning out the same stuff every night (four nights a year) - apart from being referred to as the Sissies, of course10-E Rabid wrote:Recently, upon viewing a live Sissy vid on the u tube, it began to really set in when i noticed how sped up the song actually was compared to the regular album version. In this case i'm talking about "walk away", a recent live version (2010). Anyway, I think all this time upon listening to recent live sissy stuff i somehow blocked it out of my mind to further distance myself from any discomfort. Now this has caught up to me. I don't like the sped up songs as they seem rushed and therefore lack some essence of the originals. Does anyone else agree? Seeing them live for the firstr time in my 20 year devotion automatically blocked out what i really heard, sped up song tempo's. Initially the spectacle and excitment of this event held all disregard for any of my negative rants. But now i see this up tempo thing as common and quite frankly i think it wrecks some of the songs. Do we think our herorecognizes this or like everything else, is it just to fulfill his own needs as opposed to we the fans? Of course that's all speculation and whathaveya, but I'm sorry Andy, please slow down the tunes. Nevertheless, it's probably got something to do with time. If that's the case "time sucks!" Nuff said, i leave it to all.....
Posted: 17 Jan 2011, 10:22
good point 
and
at "four nights a year"
and
at "four nights a year"Re: That tempo is bothering me.
Posted: 17 Jan 2011, 10:23
mickydazzler wrote:I can't imagine anything more soul-destroying than churning out the same stuff every night (four nights a year) - apart from being referred to as the Sissies, of course
Re: That tempo is bothering me.
Posted: 21 Jan 2011, 17:52
I think the uptempo goes with the whole ... I don't know how you call it... shaved head and military trousers thing?
I would crave for some slow stuff. 1959 has always been a favourite of mine. And some of the slow songs that you get as bonuses on the re-releases, or any of the slower stuff on Floodland. I think Eldritch does have the voice for it.
I would crave for some slow stuff. 1959 has always been a favourite of mine. And some of the slow songs that you get as bonuses on the re-releases, or any of the slower stuff on Floodland. I think Eldritch does have the voice for it.
Posted: 21 Jan 2011, 19:31
dtsom wrote:how to forget BURN in Heineken Music Hall in Amsterdam in 2003?? god, indeed went wrong...
Can appreciate more than the version they did in 2006
But what about Floorshow or Anaconda??
Can't imagine what Adrenochrome would sound live nowadays...
Posted: 21 Jan 2011, 20:37
i like them all 