The Sisters of Mercy Forum
https://myheartland.co.uk/
That's surely it, Isind! How in hell did you manage ...lsind wrote:Nope. After 13-15 and 9-11, the next pair of numbers should be 5-7 (the progression between pairs is descending, not random).Steven Eloot wrote: F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11
So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
So the next album is due for... 2014!!! (1+4=5) (Unless it was released in 2005 and somebody forgot to tell us. Which would explain why they didn't tour in 2004: they were recording the album!)
And then there will another one in 2016!!! (1+6=7)
Yeah right...
... ...Now Why would they do that?lsind wrote:(Unless it was released in 2005 and somebody forgot to tell us.)Steven Eloot wrote: F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11
So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
)No, it should be a year whose last two digits add up to 17. So the next Sisters album will be released in 1998. No, hang on...Steven Eloot wrote:Yes, due to insufficient data it's quite hard but I'll give it a try : I guess 2017. The justification for this is even more rediculious :million voices wrote:don't think there will be any Sisters gigs this year.
Number nine is a significant number for The Sisters :
- Nine while nine
- "Nine, nine, nine, singer down" (Under the Gun)
- And no gigs each nine years : 1986-1995-2004-2013-2022
Is there a calculation for the next album release date - or does that come uner "insufficient data"
F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11
So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
Yeah, well done ! I'm always in for a more optimistic theory than minelsind wrote:Nope. After 13-15 and 9-11, the next pair of numbers should be 5-7 (the progression between pairs is descending, not random).Steven Eloot wrote: F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11
So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
So the next album is due for... 2014!!! (1+4=5) (Unless it was released in 2005 and somebody forgot to tell us. Which would explain why they didn't tour in 2004: they were recording the album!
And then there will another one in 2016!!! (1+6=7)
Yeah right...
Yes, I know. At first I was thinking about that too but because 1998 was not the case and 2098 is not possible, I had to find another way to give Heartland readers some hope and keep the fire burning ...stufarq wrote:No, it should be a year whose last two digits add up to 17. So the next Sisters album will be released in 1998. No, hang on...Steven Eloot wrote:Yes, due to insufficient data it's quite hard but I'll give it a try : I guess 2017. The justification for this is even more rediculious :million voices wrote:don't think there will be any Sisters gigs this year.
Number nine is a significant number for The Sisters :
- Nine while nine
- "Nine, nine, nine, singer down" (Under the Gun)
- And no gigs each nine years : 1986-1995-2004-2013-2022
Is there a calculation for the next album release date - or does that come uner "insufficient data"
F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11
So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
Why is 2098 not possible ?Steven Eloot wrote:Yes, I know. At first I was thinking about that too but because 1998 was not the case and 2098 is not possible, I had to find another way to give Heartland readers some hope and keep the fire burning ...stufarq wrote:No, it should be a year whose last two digits add up to 17. So the next Sisters album will be released in 1998. No, hang on...Steven Eloot wrote: Yes, due to insufficient data it's quite hard but I'll give it a try : I guess 2017. The justification for this is even more rediculious :
F&L&A in 85 : 8+5 = 13t
FL in 87 : 8+7 = 15
VT in 90 : 9+0 = 9
SGWBM in 92 : 9+2 = 11
So the next missing number in this row (9, 11, 13, 15, ...) = 17
Because we're not quite sure when the timer on the real Andrew Eldritch's cryo-unit is set for.Back in time wrote:Why is 2098 not possible ?Steven Eloot wrote:Yes, I know. At first I was thinking about that too but because 1998 was not the case and 2098 is not possible, I had to find another way to give Heartland readers some hope and keep the fire burning ...stufarq wrote: No, it should be a year whose last two digits add up to 17. So the next Sisters album will be released in 1998. No, hang on...
words: "so cold (so out of control)".