Two thoughts after reading the band history page on Sisterswiki

THE place for your Sisters-related comments, questions and snippets of Sisters information. For those who do not know, The Sisters of Mercy are a rock'n'roll band. And a pop band. And an industrial groove machine. Or so they say. They make records. Lots of records, apparently. But not in your galaxy. They play concerts. Lots of concerts, actually. But you still cannot see them. So what's it all about, Alfie? This is one of the few tightly-moderated forums on Heartland, so please keep on-topic. All off-topic posts will either be moved or deleted. Chairman Bux is the editor and the editor's decision is final. Danke.
User avatar
ribbons69
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1652
Joined: 24 Jan 2009, 12:57
Location: Somewhere, terrified of dying.

I interpret that as "everything was fine until the record was due out then we had to admit that we hadn't actually made one"
"I've seen Andrew Eldritch in an ice hockey shirt onstage, and I've given him the benefit of the doubt"
Tom G Warrior of Celtic Frost




we fall to rise
User avatar
czuczu
Overbomber
Posts: 2191
Joined: 24 Oct 2005, 14:11
Location: UK

ribbons69 wrote: 14 Nov 2022, 14:24 I interpret that as "everything was fine until the record was due out then we had to admit that we hadn't actually made one"

I'd go a bit further than that - the record wasn't ready to come out cos they hadn't actually signed a deal...
User avatar
Being645
Wiki Wizard
Posts: 15272
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 12:54
Location: reconstruction status: whatever the f**k

czuczu wrote: 14 Nov 2022, 14:45
ribbons69 wrote: 14 Nov 2022, 14:24 I interpret that as "everything was fine until the record was due out then we had to admit that we hadn't actually made one"

I'd go a bit further than that - the record wasn't ready to come out cos they hadn't actually signed a deal...
Seconded, I think the deal was due to be signed until that fax appeared which convinced The Sisters to rather withdraw from this agreement... and given how Mute treated their artists at the time (luring them into and then supporting heroin abuse), I'm glad they did so... :wink: ...
User avatar
H. Blackrose
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 623
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 06:06
Location: laying down the long white line

Todashi wrote: 13 Nov 2022, 13:30 What does 'due to come out' mean?
My theory is that "Temple of Love (1992)" was supposed to come out in the UK on Mute. I don't understand why you guys above are making it more complicated than that :)
"We're Hawkwind and this is a song about love." - :von: , 1993

"We will miss them when they are gone" - M. Andrews, 2024
User avatar
mh
Above the Chemist
Posts: 8123
Joined: 23 Jun 2003, 14:41
Location: A city built on rock 'n' roll

H. Blackrose wrote: 15 Nov 2022, 03:49
Todashi wrote: 13 Nov 2022, 13:30 What does 'due to come out' mean?
My theory is that "Temple of Love (1992)" was supposed to come out in the UK on Mute. I don't understand why you guys above are making it more complicated than that :)
That seems plausible; that or Under The Gun, with Under The Gun being possibly more likely; the Mute deal falls through, UTG then comes out on Warners as standard, and Von goes on strike after that.
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
User avatar
iesus
Overbomber
Posts: 4455
Joined: 15 Mar 2006, 11:15
Location: x-EU

Truth bein between the limits covered in last 2 posts by HB and MH seems plausible to me. That must be the closest scenario.
'Are we the Baddies?'...
"Someday! Someday, everything you need, is just gonna fall out of the sky..." -A.E. Reading 1991
"Don't forget that most of the judges in witches trials had harvard degrees."
copper
Gonzoid Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 255
Joined: 28 Jan 2009, 14:33

Being645 wrote: 11 Nov 2022, 12:35maybe the Glasperlenspiel Fanzine has better info,
since... ... :eek: :eek: :eek: (memory setting in) :eek: :eek: :eek: ... UTR actually ended with the end of the relation to East/West
so, obviously, I was wrong about the info in UTR. Uh, sorry... :oops: ... still, there's a lot of interesting stuff to read in there ... :) ...
I'd look out for GPS issues 01 & 03 on that.

On UTR, I recall :von: explaining the realities of a recording artist. It costs the band a lot of time and energy to make an album. Labels release albums, but give only pittance to the artist. His rumored gambit was indeed to charge an obscene advance for what the labels saw as a cult band. A deal would've been a slam-dunk; pocket the money and put out an album. Another Rock n' Roll swindle.

The flipside is that :von: does have a point there; recording musicians have been robbed blind since the dawn of gramophone. Had he signed on the dotted line (again), he would've been harried by the label in regards to the album, enough singles for radio play, interviews with airheaded music reporters, promotional events, etc. And the Sisters, like many other acts, would still not be getting their due from the album sales. So :von: wanted to subvert the broken royalty system before agreeing to any label.

I guess he counted his beans and surmised that the live band is good business. Only a big advance would make any label deal equally profitable in relation to the time and energy required.
User avatar
H. Blackrose
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 623
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 06:06
Location: laying down the long white line

If UTG was supposed to be the first Mute single, then that makes sense with the Depeche Mode Crystal Palace gig
"We're Hawkwind and this is a song about love." - :von: , 1993

"We will miss them when they are gone" - M. Andrews, 2024
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

copper wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 00:53 I guess he counted his beans and surmised that the live band is good business. Only a big advance would make any label deal equally profitable in relation to the time and energy required.
The problem with that idea is that the Sisters stopped performing live after 1993 as well, only starting back up in '96.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
User avatar
euphoria
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1253
Joined: 11 Mar 2003, 19:39
Location: Berlin

markfiend wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 10:54
copper wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 00:53 I guess he counted his beans and surmised that the live band is good business. Only a big advance would make any label deal equally profitable in relation to the time and energy required.
The problem with that idea is that the Sisters stopped performing live after 1993 as well, only starting back up in '96.
That, and I also think he had not the slightest idea (like the rest of us) back then just how good business touring would prove to be, and that they would still be touring 30(!) years later. The good life the yearly tours has provided him with, is just another added welcome argument for him to not release anything.
User avatar
Dr. Moody
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 886
Joined: 29 Nov 2006, 12:04
Location: off the shoulder of Orion

At least they cleaned up a live version of Suzanne though, so it's possible to put stuff out there just to the fanbase without fanfare.
Could do the same for the new songs for next to nothing, test the water on sales and recharge the audience (much of the casual fan FB types are lost on the new songs, a big enough proportion of the audience he needs to retain).
Ultimately :von: doesn't want to read in the Guardian and similar saying "Fire up your black eyeliner the Lord of Darkness is back and millions of goths cry out..." He's happy on his beach.

To derail slightly, Dylan Moran once said "the thing about potential is you can use it all up.."



Anyway I'm avoiding doing my taxes, procrastinating on HL, better get on it.

These might be the seven stages of Sisters new album grief, which one are we at now?
User avatar
markfiend
goriller of form 3b
Posts: 21181
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
Location: st custards
Contact:

Dr. Moody wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 13:13 These might be the seven stages of Sisters new album grief, which one are we at now?
Dunno about anyone else but I think I've reached the "if :von: can't be arsed he can go fcuk himself and I can't be arsed with the Sisters either" stage.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
FinnMacCool
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 154
Joined: 02 May 2022, 14:19

copper wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 00:53
Being645 wrote: 11 Nov 2022, 12:35maybe the Glasperlenspiel Fanzine has better info,
since... ... :eek: :eek: :eek: (memory setting in) :eek: :eek: :eek: ... UTR actually ended with the end of the relation to East/West
so, obviously, I was wrong about the info in UTR. Uh, sorry... :oops: ... still, there's a lot of interesting stuff to read in there ... :) ...
I'd look out for GPS issues 01 & 03 on that.

On UTR, I recall :von: explaining the realities of a recording artist. It costs the band a lot of time and energy to make an album. Labels release albums, but give only pittance to the artist. His rumored gambit was indeed to charge an obscene advance for what the labels saw as a cult band. A deal would've been a slam-dunk; pocket the money and put out an album. Another Rock n' Roll swindle.

The flipside is that :von: does have a point there; recording musicians have been robbed blind since the dawn of gramophone. Had he signed on the dotted line (again), he would've been harried by the label in regards to the album, enough singles for radio play, interviews with airheaded music reporters, promotional events, etc. And the Sisters, like many other acts, would still not be getting their due from the album sales. So :von: wanted to subvert the broken royalty system before agreeing to any label.

I guess he counted his beans and surmised that the live band is good business. Only a big advance would make any label deal equally profitable in relation to the time and energy required.
Thanks - that's insightful. Of course, the people who lose out from the 'don't release anything' approach are the fans themselves, who are left with only muddy live versions of the post-recording era songs to listen to between gigs
FinnMacCool
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 154
Joined: 02 May 2022, 14:19

Dr. Moody wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 13:13 At least they cleaned up a live version of Suzanne though, so it's possible to put stuff out there just to the fanbase without fanfare.
Could do the same for the new songs for next to nothing, test the water on sales and recharge the audience (much of the casual fan FB types are lost on the new songs, a big enough proportion of the audience he needs to retain).
Ultimately :von: doesn't want to read in the Guardian and similar saying "Fire up your black eyeliner the Lord of Darkness is back and millions of goths cry out..." He's happy on his beach.

To derail slightly, Dylan Moran once said "the thing about potential is you can use it all up.."



Anyway I'm avoiding doing my taxes, procrastinating on HL, better get on it.

These might be the seven stages of Sisters new album grief, which one are we at now?
They cleaned up a live version of Suzanne?? I've never heard that before. When was this?
User avatar
Gaijin
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 845
Joined: 27 Jan 2015, 23:14
Location: Zululand

Listening to bootlegs of new songs is like taking pictures with digital zoom and vaseline smeared over the camera lens.
"The lambs are dead and the cows explode"
FinnMacCool
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 154
Joined: 02 May 2022, 14:19

Gaijin wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 16:25 Listening to bootlegs of new songs is like taking pictures with digital zoom and vaseline smeared over the camera lens.
Nicely put
User avatar
MrChris
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1413
Joined: 21 May 2003, 11:34
Location: A Forest

They cleaned up a live version of Suzanne?? I've never heard that before. When was this?
[/quote]

Yes, they did, and they put it up on the website. It sounded fantastic. I believe this is it -

Chris

---------------------------------------------
Again and again and again...
FinnMacCool
Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 154
Joined: 02 May 2022, 14:19

MrChris wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 17:54 They cleaned up a live version of Suzanne?? I've never heard that before. When was this?
Yes, they did, and they put it up on the website. It sounded fantastic. I believe this is it -


[/quote]

Wowser, thank you. It's. gone from the website now, I take it?
User avatar
czuczu
Overbomber
Posts: 2191
Joined: 24 Oct 2005, 14:11
Location: UK

FinnMacCool wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 18:07Wowser, thank you. It's. gone from the website now, I take it?
They took it down cos of the bandwidth hammering of everyone nicking a 100mb file - different times!
GC
Slight Overbomber
Posts: 1265
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 22:05

MrChris wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 17:54 They cleaned up a live version of Suzanne?? I've never heard that before. When was this?
Yes, they did, and they put it up on the website. It sounded fantastic. I believe this is it -


[/quote]

And thats the only thing they've managed to clean up in 29 years.... which is very depressing.

Furthermore I dont really believe all the stories that AE saw no money in releasing. Everybody else was doing it and making money....
I still believe that the Sisters just are nt allowed to release due to record obligations i.e. he is stlll contractually obligated and still on strike.
paint it black
Black, black, black & even blacker
Posts: 4966
Joined: 11 Jul 2002, 01:00

That was made to attract UK bookers to take the Sisters, because at that stage they were really struggling to find anyone. There was also a CD doing the rounds with the video as on the website and a higher quality audio which genuinely sounded like a studio track. It was being touted as a sampler from a forthcoming DVD. We know where that went.
Goths have feelings too
copper
Gonzoid Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 255
Joined: 28 Jan 2009, 14:33

markfiend wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 10:54
copper wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 00:53 I guess he counted his beans and surmised that the live band is good business. Only a big advance would make any label deal equally profitable in relation to the time and energy required.
The problem with that idea is that the Sisters stopped performing live after 1993 as well, only starting back up in '96.
In '94-95, he was willing to do just about anything... aside another studio album for EastWest. He talked about building up Merciful Release and supporting smaller acts. Also, in UTR, he admitted that he gave serious thought to going back to Uni and graduating. All those plans went to waste and what came out were support dates for the Sex Pistols. Those dates seemed to jolt him a bit, to get his arse back on the road on a regular basis. Easier money than the other things he'd tried in the intervening years.
euphoria wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 12:07 I also think he had not the slightest idea (like the rest of us) back then just how good business touring would prove to be, and that they would still be touring 30(!) years later. The good life the yearly tours has provided him with, is just another added welcome argument for him to not release anything.
It's an argument not to release anything, but touring was a way to keep the band alive and 'wait and see' what would happen with the labels and the industry. By the naughts, it was clear to him that no-one would cough up that advance. Meanwhile, touring and merch kept up as his bread and butter. No album at all was the way to go, as a self-funded one meant losing money. And he lacked the need to prove anything, artistically. What I mean is I doubt tours over albums was a clear-cut decision made all the way in the early 90's, rather than something that was encouraged by time and circumstance, and he went along with it.
User avatar
Being645
Wiki Wizard
Posts: 15272
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 12:54
Location: reconstruction status: whatever the f**k

copper wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 21:36
markfiend wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 10:54
copper wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 00:53 I guess he counted his beans and surmised that the live band is good business. Only a big advance would make any label deal equally profitable in relation to the time and energy required.
The problem with that idea is that the Sisters stopped performing live after 1993 as well, only starting back up in '96.
In '94-95, he was willing to do just about anything... aside another studio album for EastWest. He talked about building up Merciful Release and supporting smaller acts. Also, in UTR, he admitted that he gave serious thought to going back to Uni and graduating. All those plans went to waste and what came out were support dates for the Sex Pistols. Those dates seemed to jolt him a bit, to get his arse back on the road on a regular basis. Easier money than the other things he'd tried in the intervening years.
Exactly, your memory seems to work much better than mine ... :lol: :notworthy: ...
Though, I sometimes think there was some problem with Adam's hand so they had to get over the time until he was ready to perform again. But this is only some idea induced by Andrew saying something like "a right hand is a terrible thing to lose", which might be completely disconnected ... :wink: ...

Anyway apart from that, there were various Andrew Eldritch guest appearances and other contributions ... :) ...
https://sisterswiki.org/Andrew_Eldritch ... ppearances
User avatar
H. Blackrose
Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
Posts: 623
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 06:06
Location: laying down the long white line

paint it black wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 20:43 That was made to attract UK bookers to take the Sisters, because at that stage they were really struggling to find anyone. There was also a CD doing the rounds with the video as on the website and a higher quality audio which genuinely sounded like a studio track. It was being touted as a sampler from a forthcoming DVD. We know where that went.
The late Chris Sheehan was supposed to be putting the DVD together. Referring to him to NZ radio the first time they came here, Von said: "he left the band to pursue other interests... heroin". So there's that.
"We're Hawkwind and this is a song about love." - :von: , 1993

"We will miss them when they are gone" - M. Andrews, 2024
paint it black
Black, black, black & even blacker
Posts: 4966
Joined: 11 Jul 2002, 01:00

H. Blackrose wrote: 17 Nov 2022, 02:09
paint it black wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 20:43 That was made to attract UK bookers to take the Sisters, because at that stage they were really struggling to find anyone. There was also a CD doing the rounds with the video as on the website and a higher quality audio which genuinely sounded like a studio track. It was being touted as a sampler from a forthcoming DVD. We know where that went.
The late Chris Sheehan was supposed to be putting the DVD together. Referring to him to NZ radio the first time they came here, Von said: "he left the band to pursue other interests... heroin". So there's that.
Chris did prepare the DVD which was ready to promote. Von rejected it (I doubt wanted it, as it was a game to get live bookings) and it was then allegedly lost to a house fire (reptile house?) In Spain. Note also Jessica was filming all shows around that time. Von sold the rights to everything apart from his favourite, the reptile house, of which those were the most oft played vintage tracks, as a means to sucker old skool fans in.
Goths have feelings too
Post Reply