Posted: 19 May 2004, 13:54
maybe for you lot but i'm not botheredThrash Harry wrote:Well, Ms Strange?hallucienate wrote:aren't they a bit small then?emilystrange wrote:paddington bear wears one.
Page 2 of 4
Posted: 19 May 2004, 14:11
As a wise man once said, size doesn't matter, as long as it's a snug fit. 
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:20
I just got home from work.
I’m wearing a white “coca-cola� t-shirt and brown shorts.
http://users.pandora.be/christophe.mich ... /today.jpg
Still thinking about what I’m gone wear this evening.
(did I mention I’m going to the Bad religion concert? )
I’m wearing a white “coca-cola� t-shirt and brown shorts.
http://users.pandora.be/christophe.mich ... /today.jpg
Still thinking about what I’m gone wear this evening.
(did I mention I’m going to the Bad religion concert? )
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:29
heartlander? in shorts?? lemme see.....
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:30
So this 'bloody men' thread, has turned into 'currently wearing' thread????
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:31
@ SG.... you must be joking!!!! you dont like the fact that men have a look, but often times wear certain "laced up" numbers to produce a cleavage that would require a block and tackle to get out of !!!!!....... not wanting anoyone to notice it of course.....
LMFAO..... PIB is soooo right about the irony here...
Paddy
LMFAO..... PIB is soooo right about the irony here...
Paddy
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:32
do you have a problem with thatSexygoth wrote:So this 'bloody men' thread, has turned into 'currently wearing' thread????
you should see me in half a hour (I'm totaly going Punk
)Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:33
It's different when you go for a night out!! And surely women can wear what they want without fear of being leered at??
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:34
Thats not my point.... its more the provocotuer calling the kettle a non shiny thing....Sexygoth wrote:It's different when you go for a night out!! And surely women can wear what they want without fear of being leered at??
Paddy.
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:36
I'm shocked to the very core Paddy!!!
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:41
The coreSexygoth wrote:I'm shocked to the very core Paddy!!!
? Would that be around the cleavage ?Paddy.
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:45
The irony is correct. Like the current tread to wear tops with slogans. By definition you're saying read my slogan. By association you're saying look at my tits.
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:48
There's also the trend for trousers with slogans across the posterior area...
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:56
Anything to do with your avatar?markfiend wrote:There's also the trend for trousers with slogans across the posterior area...
Posted: 19 May 2004, 16:56
or
or
or
Posted: 19 May 2004, 17:24
i'm all infavour of men wearing trousers with slogans on the bum. generally no room on the front, lol
Posted: 19 May 2004, 18:20
I'm gonna leave this thread alone because you're missing the point and I'm getting angry!!!
I'll probably post later when i'm drunk though......I tend to make more sense anyway!!
I'll probably post later when i'm drunk though......I tend to make more sense anyway!!
Posted: 19 May 2004, 18:37
Blimmin Heck......6th post in HOW many years???mik wrote:We turn into letches because we get a better view of your tits when you're not wearing a duffel coat.
LOL
Posted: 19 May 2004, 18:38
see what I mean....mention lasses in next to nowt...................lol
Posted: 19 May 2004, 18:53
A case of quality over quantityDebaser wrote:Blimmin Heck......6th post in HOW many years???mik wrote:We turn into letches because we get a better view of your tits when you're not wearing a duffel coat.
LOL
hem-hem...I'll do anything to avoid moderating my own forums sometimes!
'Sides; its true. We men are simple beasts with a highly developed visual attraction thingy. Hence porn mags. Women more cerebrally aroused.
Which begs the question: Why aren't more geeks shacked up with porn stars?
Answers on the back of a envelope containing high quality pornography to the usual address please.
Posted: 19 May 2004, 18:58
Ha ha...and two posts in less than 30 mins....people will talk!
Posted: 19 May 2004, 19:10
@ Big Si
he was gay
he was gay
Posted: 19 May 2004, 19:56
well I've just come back from the gym, and all you see there is women not wearing very much anyway. oh and while we're on the subject, thongs I mean why wear them? they're the size of dental floss, they cover much, they must irratate being stuck up yer arse crack and they cost a fortune, so why not just not wear anything?
I do think men look more not because they can see more, but just incase they/we get to see something we shouldn't, think it's all down to the imagination. don't think any of this sounds right, but hey I got 50 pints of scrumpy to drink
I mean why wear them? they're the size of dental floss, they cover much, they must irratate being stuck up yer arse crack and they cost a fortune, so why not just not wear anything?I do think men look more not because they can see more, but just incase they/we get to see something we shouldn't, think it's all down to the imagination. don't think any of this sounds right, but hey I got 50 pints of scrumpy to drink
Posted: 19 May 2004, 20:02
But the character wasn't, Harold always called him "you dirty old man!". Which is why he's in my post with Benny Hill!Red Sunsets wrote:@ Big Si
he was gay
Posted: 19 May 2004, 20:12
wifes favourite maternity wear. she was sooo.. right. we had a girl
@Paddy
i think this thread is rapidly becoming the irony. time to hang-up my post count for a few days
@Paddy
i think this thread is rapidly becoming the irony. time to hang-up my post count for a few days