Page 2 of 3

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 11:06
by randdebiel²
emilystrange wrote:
randdebiel² wrote:
emilystrange wrote:i did it! and things are much better now!

except for this maths assignment....

good luck, honey
maths :drool:
can I be of any assistance?
@DI: good luck :worship:
yes, tell me what to do with adding numbers 5 and 7 in diff arrangements.. its an investigation. apparently. would i be right in thinking its a sequence thing?
euh, I don't understand what you mean?maybe my english isn't good enough?

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 12:40
by markfiend
Don't worry dude. English is my first language and I didn't understand it!

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 12:57
by randdebiel²
I think she means "what numbers can you produce that way...." to which the answer would be any number since 5 and 7 are relatively prime...but I'm not sure though...(but then you'd have to have the possibility to substract too, not only adding....)

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 13:20
by markfiend
Oh, right so like
5+5+5-7-7=1
7-5=2
5+5-7=3
7+7-5-5=4
5=5
5+5+5+5-7-7=6
7=7
...
etc.

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 13:21
by randdebiel²
yup...

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 13:23
by randdebiel²
the thing being of course, you don't have to do them all by hand, because if you can make 1=5+5+5-7-7
it means you can make any number n by saying
n=n*1=n*5+n*5+n*5-n*7-n*7 :)

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 14:07
by markfiend
Well, yes, but that's cheating ;)

It's more fun to try to find the shortest for any given number.

Jeez, I am a geek, finding maths fun! :lol:

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 14:29
by randdebiel²
markfiend wrote:Well, yes, but that's cheating ;)

It's more fun to try to find the shortest for any given number.

Jeez, I am a geek, finding maths fun! :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: hey,I'm a mathematician, if there's a geek in here that would be me :o

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 14:48
by lazarus corporation
well, in that case you can make imaginary numbers:

sq. root(5+5+5+5-7-7-7) = i

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 14:54
by hallucienate
5*7+7 = 42

meaning of life, universer and everything.

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 14:59
by markfiend
Isn't multiplication cheating? ;)

@lazcorp: you can't make irrational numbers though. :innocent:

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 15:03
by hallucienate
markfiend wrote:Isn't multiplication cheating? ;)
only on macs

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 15:05
by lazarus corporation
markfiend wrote:@lazcorp: you can't make irrational numbers though. :innocent:
*ahem*

sq. root (7-5)

easy (if I remember correctly...)

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 15:07
by randdebiel²
markfiend wrote:Isn't multiplication cheating? ;)
a&hem 5*x =x+x+x+x+x :p

yes, I know you knew that :lol:

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 15:25
by markfiend
lazarus corporation wrote:sq. root (7-5)
Bollocks

Transcendental numbers then. :innocent:

Make pi.

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 15:42
by lazarus corporation
markfiend wrote:
lazarus corporation wrote:sq. root (7-5)
Bollocks

Transcendental numbers then. :innocent:
(after a quick check on google!):

(7-5) to the power of the sq. root of (7-5) is a transcendental number (it's called the Gelfond-Schneider Constant)
markfiend wrote:Make pi.
(5+5+5+7) / 7

that's pretty close. ;)

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 15:54
by hallucienate
markfiend wrote:Make pi.
sorry

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 15:54
by markfiend
@ lazcorp: Bugger. You win ;)

But 22/7 for pi is pathetic :lol: only the third decimal.

(((7x7)+5+5+5+7)x5)/(((7+7)x7)+5+5+5) is accurate to 6 decimals!

@ hal: You'll be needing your coat?

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 15:55
by randdebiel²
:lol:
this is getting freaky :lol:

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 15:56
by randdebiel²
markfiend wrote: Make pi.
my previous avatar would have been good for that one....

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 16:06
by lazarus corporation
markfiend wrote:@ lazcorp: Bugger. You win ;)

But 22/7 for pi is pathetic :lol: only the third decimal.

(((7x7)+5+5+5+7)x5)/(((7+7)x7)+5+5+5) is accurate to 6 decimals!
:notworthy:

do you think that answered emilystrange's question? :innocent: :lol:

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 16:10
by markfiend
lazarus corporation wrote:do you think that answered emilystrange's question? :innocent: :lol:
Probably not. ;)

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 16:17
by markfiend
By the way, do you think moonchild minds us hi-jacking her thread with this crap? :innocent:

Posted: 01 Oct 2004, 17:25
by emilystrange
markfiend wrote:
lazarus corporation wrote:do you think that answered emilystrange's question? :innocent: :lol:
Probably not. ;)
No.. i'm only allowed to add. the q is to explore numbers that can be made this way, and ones that can't.
and then extend by using different pairs of numbers.
Don't tell me the answer, i have to do it myself even if its my worst nightmare. just tell me if i'm on the right track with sequencing!

Posted: 04 Oct 2004, 11:26
by randdebiel²
you probably are....I'll ry to solve it this afternoon just to be sure....