![We are not worthy! :notworthy:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
![We are not worthy! :notworthy:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Have you got kids Nick? I don´t think so...nick the stripper wrote:I don't like how people say stuff like "people that molest little children should die a slow and painful death"
You can't just say they are evil people simple as that, everyone has their good and bad points.
Black Biscuit wrote: a) the prevalence of male homosexuals infiltrating government jobs to further their self-interest and political lobbying, and giving favouritism to their own type in terms of promotions/prospects. (I live in Sydney, remember!);
b) emasculated males and woossy 'male feminists';
c) pseudo-intellectual feminists (some of whom are hysterical and/or emotional misfits) who try to intellectualize their hang-ups or blame 'society' for their own body image issues, lack of comfort within their own skin and low self-esteem;
d) people who never have sex because they haven't learnt that until you love yourself you can't love anyone else;
e) cranky menopausal women with an axe to grind;
f) short-haired 50 year old women (see also 'e', above);
g) posers - such as the many goth club types who never have sex yet get around in all sorts of tasteless PVC and bondage gear. (Ah well, not to worry. Fat, pasty-faced types aren't sexy, anyway.);
h) people who put their own 'stuff' on others (see also 'c' and 'e' above);
i) young feminists who've never been married, nor even had a long-term relationship, yet think they know a thing or two about men;
j) sexist lesbians who pre-judge males.
I don't have a "KID" because I am a "KID"Delilah wrote:Have you got kids Nick? I don´t think so...nick the stripper wrote:I don't like how people say stuff like "people that molest little children should die a slow and painful death"
You can't just say they are evil people simple as that, everyone has their good and bad points.
I voted for promiscuity on the basis that there's far too much of it going on.lazarus corporation wrote:And, on the subject of the latest results of the poll:
2 people apparently have a greater dislike of 'promiscuity' than of paedophilia, bestiality or necrophilia.
Does this mean they don't mind people having sex with corpses, so long as they're faithful to one particular corpse?
I know which I'd rather watchd00mw0lf wrote:I'm more worried at the fact someone's upset at gay men, but less so at gay women
Yeah, about a year. Then, I go to a Heartland meet, consume a metric ton of amphetamine and end up six feet under.emilystrange wrote:@ Dark... you have plenty of time to find out.
Is "both" a valid option?Dark wrote:I don't. *prepares for impact*andymackem wrote:I know which I'd rather watchd00mw0lf wrote:I'm more worried at the fact someone's upset at gay men, but less so at gay women
lazarus corporation wrote:I'm sure everyone here agrees with you - judge by the votes, if nothing else
written as a vegan/chain-smoking/left wing/liberal/humanitarian
but would I give the state in the guise of Tony Blair (or Michael Howard or Charles Kennedy) the right to kill a citizen of the UK - no, absolutely not.
I understand (as best I can, not being a parent) your anger at these repulsive people, but I can't stand the idea of the state having the right of life or death over it's citizens, regardless of the initial excuse (and you can be sure the target audience for the death penalty would grow and grow, starting at paedophiles and then encompassing terrorists, suspected terrorists, people suspected of terrorism and imprisoned without trial because there's really no evidence, people who the state doesn't like...).
NB - I believe that life imprisonment should mean just that.
Well, I think, it is unimaginable that peadophilia would become normal, even if you have the consent part from both parties, it doens't seem possible to spend your life with a kid, it will grow, and eventually loose its youth, which was the part that attracted... When you're gay the person is not able to change sexes. Of course you have sex-operations, but that doesn't really count, in this case, i believe, and above it all, it's a different matter...andymackem wrote:Attitudes change, societies change. It might seem unimaginable to us today, but could a future society not feel the same way about paedophilia? And before you jump on me, what might your great-grandfather have said about homosexuality?