Posted: 24 May 2005, 18:48
I went to see it on saturday night and even though I'm not much of a Star Wars fan it was quite good.
He didn't? I'm inclined to agree with him on reviews. Then again, he is a cultural journalist, so maybe incipient stupidity has brought him low. I'll go see it tomorrow night, and let you know...Black Alice wrote:Mark Kermode didn't really rate it - and he's usually pretty good - but having read this thread I will give it a go.
Hah - knew I wasn't the only one My husband forced me to join because I had been lurking for so long that he threatened to join and "out" meblack-saturn wrote:I've been lurking this board for ages but never actually joined till now. Now I've got to find a decent avvy.
He was on the review programme on Newsnight with some vacuous woman next to whom a pet rock would appear insightful! Tom Paulin was also there - and he was pretty positive about the film - which was really bizarre ........so do let us knowtimsinister wrote:He didn't? I'm inclined to agree with him on reviews. Then again, he is a cultural journalist, so maybe incipient stupidity has brought him low. I'll go see it tomorrow night, and let you know...Black Alice wrote:Mark Kermode didn't really rate it - and he's usually pretty good - but having read this thread I will give it a go.
I wrote:i wept for what they had done to star wars after i saw ep1
i thought ep2 was slightly better when i saw it at the cinema, but when i watched it on dvd i found myself skipping huge amounts of it, and have not watched it since
so i was dreading the 3rd one... but i saw it yesterday and have to admit that i really enjoyed it
it had more than enough nods to ep4 to keep a hardcore geek like me happy - i gasped the first time i heard that darth vader rasp through his mask for example, and there were loads of other things that brought a wry smile to my face
there were some nice touches like having the space ships moving towards the designs, shapes & decor of ep4 - making the bizarre continuity a bit easier to swallow.
and it was a lot darker than 1 & 2 - and much less nonsense about trade embargos and politics
the last half hour felt rushed though, while the earlier part of the film seemed to have scenes which really did not advance plot of character development in the slightest - methinks lucas needs to get a better producer or editor or something. trim the pointless scenes showing people walking in and out of spaceship, no matter how nice the CG background may be, and concentrate on the dialogue.
i liked it more than ep6 (jedi), but its still not a patch on ep4 (new hope) or ep5 (empire).
the review in the metro had it right when they said it had a huge gaping hole where harrison ford's charisma should have been
overall i think they've just about managed to rescue the series.
i can only hope that inevitable touch-ups of ep 1 & 2 in a couple of years (super special edition with enhanced fx and new scenes!! you know it.. ) will sort out some of the s**t...
i wept for what they had done to star wars after i saw ep1
How could you possibly think that?Chairman Bux wrote:Star Trek was always better.
Good chap!The Chairman wrote:Star Trek was always better.
Saw it on opening night last thursday, and according to my mate's who went as well, they saw the Millennium Falcon in it.Quiff Boy wrote:the review in the metro had it right when they said it had a huge gaping hole where harrison ford's charisma should have been
Quite easily, my dear.Mrs RicheyJames wrote:How could you possibly think that?Chairman Bux wrote:Star Trek was always better.
Only the once.timsinister wrote:Good chap!The Chairman wrote:Star Trek was always better.
But have you seen Nemesis?
The prosecution rests, m'lud.The Chairman wrote:Only the once.
True, but it was sh*te really wasn't it?Chairman Bux wrote:Quite easily, my dear.Mrs RicheyJames wrote:How could you possibly think that?Chairman Bux wrote:Star Trek was always better.
Star Trek was groundbreaking in the way it portrayed inter-racial (and inter-species) relationships; the men had great three-quarter length trousers the women had short skirts; they all had tri-corders; Spock had pointy ears, and the theme tune was much better.
And William Shatner was in it.
I've always liked the way he got to sleep with the alien women, a creed I've tried to live by all my adult life.Mrs RicheyJames wrote:True, but it was sh*te really wasn't it?Chairman Bux wrote:Quite easily, my dear.Mrs RicheyJames wrote: How could you possibly think that?
Star Trek was groundbreaking in the way it portrayed inter-racial (and inter-species) relationships; the men had great three-quarter length trousers the women had short skirts; they all had tri-corders; Spock had pointy ears, and the theme tune was much better.
And William Shatner was in it.
And the only good (funny) thing about Mr Shatner, is his name!
Absolutely.Big Si wrote:But neither are a patch on Blade Runner!
Damn straight! However, I'd take an ST film over SW any-day. Good action, quality plots, and if the acting isn't brilliant, at least it's amusing.Big Si wrote:But neither are a patch on Blade Runner!
Chairman Bux wrote: I've always liked the way he got to sleep with the alien women, a creed I've tried to live by all my adult life.
Look stop it. I'm agreeing with you and I'm making myself out to be some sort of geek here!Big Si wrote:But neither are a patch on Blade Runner!
I think I saw the Falcon in one of the trailers on TV the other day.Big Si wrote:Saw it on opening night last thursday, and according to my mate's who went as well, they saw the Millennium Falcon in it.
Admit the truth, and JOIN USMrs RicheyJames wrote:Look stop it. I'm agreeing with you and I'm making myself out to be some sort of geek here!Big Si wrote:But neither are a patch on Blade Runner!
Not possible I'm afraid!timsinister wrote:Admit the truth, and JOIN USMrs RicheyJames wrote:Look stop it. I'm agreeing with you and I'm making myself out to be some sort of geek here!Big Si wrote:But neither are a patch on Blade Runner!