Page 2 of 2

Posted: 27 Sep 2005, 00:52
by Mrs RicheyJames
I think we've had this conversation about that little sarcy fooker some time ago.....

Posted: 27 Sep 2005, 09:21
by Obviousman
Johnny M wrote:
Obviousman wrote: Hope that does make sense :roll: :lol:
In an Antwerp student type of way, yes. ;D
Not very much then :lol:
Johnny M wrote:
Obviousman wrote:And I presume you were warned on the level of madness in here before :P
Weren't we all? 8)
Guess that's why we gather here in the first place :lol:
smiscandlon wrote:
boudicca wrote:words alone do not really convey the more subtle nuances of things.
Yes, that Shakespeare bloke really struggled without emoticons didn't he?
:lol: :notworthy: :lol:

I think for me a no-emoticon-week wouldn't be too good. Don't know how my talking (typing) in English sounds, but in Dutch I always type with lots of irony and way too serious expressions. Some people even got mad with me because they thought I was genuinly serious :eek: (hence my overuse of ' :lol: ' and ' :D ' )

Bouccida is very right, with the 93% and stuff...
Didn't von once say he rather conversates through raising an eyebrow instead of using words :?: (IIRC it had to do something with America)

So no emoticons: not for me :innocent: