Page 2 of 4

Posted: 10 Oct 2005, 21:48
by Brideoffrankenstein
I don't know what I thought of James Ray's set - it had WTF moments and good moments (guitary bits). What a nice bloke though for asking Quiffy to introduce him to all the Heartlanders :notworthy:

Posted: 10 Oct 2005, 21:51
by Quiff Boy
Brideoffrankenstein wrote:I don't know what I thought of James Ray's set - it had WTF moments and good moments (guitary bits). What a nice bloke though for asking Quiffy to introduce him to all the Heartlanders :notworthy:
yep, a very nice man indeed.

not sure he'd appreciate us telling everyone that though. do terrioble things for his image ;) :lol:

Posted: 10 Oct 2005, 21:53
by lazarus corporation
Quiff Boy wrote:do terrioble things for his image ;) :lol:
unlike a TopShop coat? :innocent: :lol:

Posted: 10 Oct 2005, 21:53
by James Blast
It was nothing short of great and the rest of you are all daft!

I will say no more on this matter Image

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 01:02
by snowey
Dark wrote:I have nothing to trade for CD-R bootlegs, nor do I have the desire to trade for them. Were they vinyl, that'd be another story, but CD-Rs should be weeded.
Either way. I didn't see Mr Ray, but from everything the Performance and Gangwar did, I expect he was brilliant. When I get home I'll download the 4080Peru site mp3s.
If you have nothing to trade then why mention it?? I don't care...

The reason I have not put the James Ray gig out to weed is because of people like you who expect everything for nothing.... If your so interested in James Ray why were you not there...oh yes school the next day and mummy wouldn't let you go.

Try standing in front of Mr Ray with a camcorder for 50 odd minutes like I did or standing there with a mic on your bag strap leading to a mini-disc recorder in the bag for 50 odd mins like Mrs S did...oh no it's easier for you to say that these must be weeded...grow up little boy and join the real world. :evil:

Sorry to all the other people on the site who has read this little rant but he makes me so mad :evil: Time to take the tablet and go to bed. :D

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 02:34
by Petseri
James Blast wrote:I will say no more on this matter Image
:lol: :lol: Who believes that? :lol: :lol:

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 07:29
by aims
snowey wrote: If your so interested in James Ray why were you not there...oh yes school the next day and mummy wouldn't let you go.
Or perhaps because it was a logistical impossibility? Sure, state your case over the bootleg (and I happen to agree with your "You don't get something for nothing" outlook), but for f**k's sake lay of the patronizing BS. Maybe he doesn't deserve a weed, but it's hardly is fault if he's unable or not permitted to go to the gig. I don't remember emily getting flack for "oh yes, work the next day and Mr S' boss wouldn't let you go". It's the same thing, try and have some perspective :von:

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 07:44
by snowey
Motz wrote:
snowey wrote: If your so interested in James Ray why were you not there...oh yes school the next day and mummy wouldn't let you go.
Or perhaps because it was a logistical impossibility? Sure, state your case over the bootleg (and I happen to agree with your "You don't get something for nothing" outlook), but for f**k's sake lay of the patronizing BS. Maybe he doesn't deserve a weed, but it's hardly is fault if he's unable or not permitted to go to the gig. I don't remember emily getting flack for "oh yes, work the next day and Mr S' boss wouldn't let you go". It's the same thing, try and have some perspective :von:
Yes but Ems has not come on here saying that these CDs have got to be weeded coz she says so. Why come on here and mention he has nothing to trade for these gigs so therefore it must be weeded?

It can't be a logistical impossibility to get to Leeds from Lincoln if Debaser can do it, all right she has a car but there are loads of us on here who travelled by train / bus etc etc to watch bands when we were his age, I know I used to. You can get the Train to Leeds by changing at Doncaster.

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 11:25
by Padstar
timsinister wrote:Intelligent music, being played to an unsympathetic audience in an unsuitable venue. Ah well.
Well i think you have it more or less right. I think "challenging" would be a better word than intelligent.

It seemed to me a very personal piece and by that virtue an awkward vehicle for that event. Not my cup of tea at all as ive said elsewhere im a simple man and like gigs to be full of songs rather than pieces with a heavier artistic leaning.

Still a bit confused,
Paddy.

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 13:19
by boudicca
Brideoffrankenstein wrote:I don't know what I thought of James Ray's set - it had WTF moments and good moments (guitary bits).
Mmmm, yes. Some paper aeroplane moments weren't there... :wink: :innocent:

I was feeling pretty lightheaded as a result of lack of food and sleep, so the white noise and epileptic-fit-inducing lights were less enjoyable than they might have been. And the thing about me is, I like songs, and people on the stage to play 'em.

Having said that, when I was asked for by Mr. Ray ( ;D 8) :P ), on my way out the door, and he pronounced my name wrong (BOOOO-DI-CA!), I found him to be a charming fellow indeed. With a groovy coat which I hadn't quite noticed through the copious anmounts of dry ice.

"You're Scottish! I could have guessed from the attitude." :eek: :lol:

Pray tell, my southern brethern, what exactly is a Scottish attitude?

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 13:19
by paint it black
thought it was great, exactly what i expected to see, if anything a slight compromise with the real songs. pity he forgot to dedicate edie, but... L.T.W :wink:

can't wait for the next project if permission is granted. :notworthy: :von: :notworthy:

rhombus were cool and sg's voice really good, but i didn't quite get the smurphs. sorry :roll:

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 13:40
by Francis
paint it black wrote:sg's voice really good
:lol:

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 14:18
by Mrs RicheyJames
paint it black wrote: sg's voice really good

What?? :lol:

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 15:55
by Padstar
paint it black wrote: but i didn't quite get the smurphs. sorry :roll:
awwww no .... gutted.

P.

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 16:06
by scotty
DerekR wrote:Twas the first time I've seen Rhombus and I was mightily impressed :notworthy:

The Smurfs, of course, rocked 8)
Total agreement Derek R, on both counts :notworthy: , the Smurfs were the Dogs Bollocks :von: :notworthy: .
*edit*, does anyone else think James Ray would make a great Dr Who?.

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 17:28
by mockeldritch
paint it black wrote: but i didn't quite get the smurphs.
I'm sorry, was it all too complicated?

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 17:57
by paint it black
mockeldritch wrote:
paint it black wrote: but i didn't quite get the smurphs.
I'm sorry, was it all too complicated?
no, just after all the raving i've heard about them i expected them to be better. they didn't sound too much like the sisters and the singer didn't sound or look much like von, so i couldn't really see the point :?

still, all helped pad the night out

*sorry for having an opinion, and probably the wrong one at that*

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 18:02
by emilystrange
yes, indeed.

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 18:05
by boudicca
For what it's worth, I dug the Smurphs. The whole concept of tribute bands usually leaves me cold, but they were really bloody good. The in-between song banter (and heckling!) was worth the price of the evening alone... :notworthy:

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 18:09
by mockeldritch
paint it black wrote:
mockeldritch wrote:
paint it black wrote: but i didn't quite get the smurphs.
I'm sorry, was it all too complicated?
no, just after all the raving i've heard about them i expected them to be better. they didn't sound too much like the sisters and the singer didn't sound or look much like von, so i couldn't really see the point :?

still, all helped pad the night out

*sorry for having an opinion, and probably the wrong one at that*
I'm sorry you feel that way. We do our best.

As a side note I'm not quite sure what you expect me to do in order to look more like Von, drop six stone in weight and about eight inches in height?

Sorry, but much though I enjoy the whole thing it's not quite worth *that* much to me :)

As to sounding like him, well there are limits to how far any impression can go. It's quite hard to judge from this side because it always sounds just like me and nothing like Von when I hear it, but I think that's inevitable.

"the point", if there is one, is for us to have fun. And hopefully to entertain people. Since we all had fun and at least some people seemed to be entertained I'd say we did our job.
I'm not quite sure what you were expecting, but given your response I guess it was more than a little unrealistic.

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 18:23
by boudicca
mockeldritch wrote:As to sounding like him, well there are limits to how far any impression can go. It's quite hard to judge from this side because it always sounds just like me and nothing like Von when I hear it, but I think that's inevitable.
I for one was impressed. At certain points I thought you caught it brilliantly.

Which left me imagining someone doing Von impressions in front of the mirror with a hairbrush :wink: ... I assume it must have happened at some point! :innocent:

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 18:31
by mockeldritch
boudicca wrote:
I for one was impressed. At certain points I thought you caught it brilliantly.

Which left me imagining someone doing Von impressions in front of the mirror with a hairbrush :wink: ... I assume it must have happened at some point! :innocent:
Bless you! I shudder to think how long I've spent singing those songs. No hairbrush though... I've never owned one!

Believe me I wasn't fishing for anything there. Naturally it disappoints me to hear people saying things like that but at the end of the day it's all about perception.

Having spent several years in A Certain Tribute Band with A Certain Person known to some here (and not terribly well liked, can't imagine why ;)) I've seen precisely how far people's desire to hear something colours their expectations.

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 18:37
by paint it black
mockeldritch wrote: "the point", if there is one, is for us to have fun. And hopefully to entertain people. Since we all had fun and at least some people seemed to be entertained I'd say we did our job.
I'm not quite sure what you were expecting, but given your response I guess it was more than a little unrealistic.
didn't realise you were the singer.

yep people had fun and that was the main thing :D

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 18:53
by snowey
At the end of the day Sid does not look like :von: , Paddy is no Wayne (or Gary) and Ian is deffo not Craig and they would be the 1st to say so. Sid does look a lot better with a ton of dry ice round him :innocent: :lol: .
(crewe the other year anyone)....

I go to watch the Smurphs to a) see a good live band b) meet up with some mates and c) SG's heckling but as you say Ez, each to there own.

Looking forward to a dark November night in Crewe. :D :D

Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 20:10
by Brideoffrankenstein
I thought the Smurphs were fantastic - there was nothing not to get about them :notworthy: