Page 2 of 2

Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 10:28
by markfiend
You missed one Martin...

Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 17:41
by Petseri
markfiend wrote:You missed one Martin...
:lol: I did consider undoing this one too:
rian wrote:Image
Seriously, which did I miss?

Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 17:49
by MadameButterfly
It *would* be found on the 10th posting on page one but not there anymore... :innocent:

Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 18:03
by Petseri
MadameButterfly wrote:It *would* be found on the 10th posting on page one but not there anymore... :innocent:
I must have forgotten to hit SUBMIT. Oh well.

Posted: 18 Oct 2005, 17:38
by rian
Why are my tits gone?

Was it really not "work safe"?

Oh well.....

Posted: 18 Oct 2005, 21:45
by Chairman Bux
lazarus corporation wrote:I do my best (work) to the gentle sound of angle-grinders
Likewise. :lol:

Posted: 18 Oct 2005, 21:54
by Obviousman
rian wrote:Why are my tits gone?
That's called an operation :innocent: :lol:

Posted: 18 Oct 2005, 22:32
by MadameButterfly
rian wrote:Why are my tits gone?

Was it really not "work safe"?

Oh well.....
:lol: :lol: Firstly to the above posts!

@ rian - Knew that would happen....

Breast-feeding seems to fall under the not "work safe" either in certain cases...

But oh well still going.

Posted: 19 Oct 2005, 02:44
by Petseri
rian wrote:Why are my tits gone?

Was it really not "work safe"?

Oh well.....
You are surprised now that it was edited, but you assumed then that it might be. :?: No, it is not work safe. You work at home, but those on here who do not do not need to have a boss pass by just as we open the thread. A fair compromise was to leave the link with a warning, no?

I was going to write that there is nothing wrong with a pair of tits, but I am sure that some of you will take it as a challenge and post something disturbing. :urff:

Posted: 19 Oct 2005, 17:01
by Izzy HaveMercy
My tits were lovelier than Rian's anyway... ;)

IZ.

Posted: 19 Oct 2005, 17:09
by Obviousman
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:My tits were lovelier than Rian's anyway... ;)

IZ.
Ah, so you had an operation too? :innocent: