Page 2 of 2

Posted: 29 Apr 2006, 10:49
by Badlander
itnAklipse wrote:As BOX pointed out earlier, the setlist variations really are similar to what they ever were in the 80s and in the 90s...even on long tours, -91 and -85, there's not been more variation in the setlists than now. So most probably there will not be now, either.
I know. :)
But songs like FALAA, Burn, and Come together have been played this year, and now they seem to be completely left out. Just a bit more variety in the set lists, within the framework of the 2006 tour, would be nice. 8)
We had no Vision thing, Flood 2, or On the wire in Paris either. So I don't think I'm being unreasonable here.

Posted: 29 Apr 2006, 11:01
by Ozpat
Badlander wrote:
itnAklipse wrote:As BOX pointed out earlier, the setlist variations really are similar to what they ever were in the 80s and in the 90s...even on long tours, -91 and -85, there's not been more variation in the setlists than now. So most probably there will not be now, either.
I know. :)
But songs like FALAA, Burn, and Come together have been played this year, and now they seem to be completely left out. Just a bit more variety in the set lists, within the framework of the 2006 tour, would be nice. 8)
We had no Vision thing, Flood 2, or On the wire in Paris either. So I don't think I'm being unreasonable here.
War On Drugs hasn't been played for a while either...

Posted: 29 Apr 2006, 11:46
by itnAklipse
Yeah, i hear you and agree some more variation would be nice especially when more recordings surface ;) But i guess the lack of certain songs (VT, War on Drugs, FALAA, Flood II...) right now has to do with Von's throat condition still...they're all songs that make use of those painful higher notes and wailing.
And i suppose with intense touring the throat has a hard time healing..