Posted: 30 Apr 2006, 19:52
You don't like being called "Herr Blast" ?James Blast wrote:why the hell not, at least it's better than some of the things I get called on here
@ Bad Whisky : welcome to HL !
You don't like being called "Herr Blast" ?James Blast wrote:why the hell not, at least it's better than some of the things I get called on here
Okay then: welcome to HL!Bad Whisky wrote:By the way, I didn't meant to be rude.
My name is Logan Rodrigues.
I'm 27 and I live in Portugal.
I made my first contact with The Sisters of Mercy when I was 11.
I loved them from the first time I hear it.
I'm a naked flame !!
Ok.James Blast wrote:why the hell not, at least it's better than some of the things I get called on here
normal service has been resumed
did I say Phantom's pish?
Dark wrote:Marian's awful.
Oh god, you're not going to cover that too, are you?robertzombie wrote:Dark wrote:Marian's awful.
Nice one. I hope it's trashed properly.robertzombie wrote:LOL! if only! ... we'll stick to 1959 for now
My thoughts exactly. Since when was it a love song? More a lust song than anything else.markfiend wrote:
I think I know....markfiend wrote:
So, you enjoyed the gig then...Andy TG wrote:Having just returned from Bristol Academy I have to put forward for removal "Romeo Down" - What rubbish is that song. Its go not "Guts".
Technically, it's not a Sisters song.Gimme_The_Ring wrote:Only song I seem to skip is 1969. Seems a bit out of place with the rest of the album and a bit "throw away, thrashy" for my liking.
OuchBadlander wrote:Technically, it's not a Sisters song.Gimme_The_Ring wrote:Only song I seem to skip is 1969. Seems a bit out of place with the rest of the album and a bit "throw away, thrashy" for my liking.
I couldn't really believe how someone can't stand the original.Badlander wrote:
Technically, it's not a Sisters song.
DGP00666 wrote:I couldn't really believe how someone can't stand the original.Badlander wrote:
Technically, it's not a Sisters song.
Which is why I skip it.Badlander wrote:Technically, it's not a Sisters song.Gimme_The_Ring wrote:Only song I seem to skip is 1969. Seems a bit out of place with the rest of the album and a bit "throw away, thrashy" for my liking.