Page 14 of 41
Posted: 26 Apr 2008, 18:53
by Ozpat
cardoman wrote:Ozpat wrote:cardoman wrote:
Run-off says 'PAE-03A' and 'PAE-03B' is a honest answer of the seller...
Might be for you......
I allready have it Ozpat (for about 60€) but I need another for a friend...
That is not what I meant.
The run off txt would not say anything to me. Still doesn't.
Posted: 26 Apr 2008, 21:05
by cardoman
Ozpat wrote:cardoman wrote:Ozpat wrote:
Might be for you......
I allready have it Ozpat (for about 60€) but I need another for a friend...
That is not what I meant.
The run off txt would not say anything to me. Still doesn't.
Ok, now I understand... for me 3 things: the cross, the rogi and the backside with the rounded edges of the fake and the straight edges of the genuine... So if he/she is confirming PAE-03A and B while it is for spiggy the buyer will do a good job... Hey friend, still friends?
Posted: 26 Apr 2008, 22:30
by Ozpat
cardoman wrote:Ozpat wrote:cardoman wrote:
I allready have it Ozpat (for about 60€) but I need another for a friend...
That is not what I meant.
The run off txt would not say anything to me. Still doesn't.
Ok, now I understand... for me 3 things: the cross, the rogi and the backside with the rounded edges of the fake and the straight edges of the genuine... So if he/she is confirming PAE-03A and B while it is for spiggy the buyer will do a good job... Hey friend, still friends?
Ok, I knew about the other things. Just the PAE is new to me. Thanks for explaining! Sure, still friends...
....always!
Posted: 03 May 2008, 07:01
by cardoman
cardoman wrote:It has bin a while but it's back
DD
The question is if it's fake or genuine...
The damage IS done...
Posted: 03 May 2008, 07:02
by paul
cardoman wrote:cardoman wrote:It has bin a while but it's back
DD
The question is if it's fake or genuine...
The damage IS done...
mmm, so vagueness IS paying off ...
Posted: 03 May 2008, 10:07
by Dark
Ozpat wrote:cardoman wrote:Ozpat wrote:
That is not what I meant.
The run off txt would not say anything to me. Still doesn't.
Ok, now I understand... for me 3 things: the cross, the rogi and the backside with the rounded edges of the fake and the straight edges of the genuine... So if he/she is confirming PAE-03A and B while it is for spiggy the buyer will do a good job... Hey friend, still friends?
Ok, I knew about the other things. Just the PAE is new to me. Thanks for explaining! Sure, still friends...
....always!
Vortex!
Posted: 06 May 2008, 19:37
by cardoman
Strange... relisting... bad feelings from seller? Look at description
strange
Posted: 06 May 2008, 19:39
by dtsom
cardoman wrote:Strange... relisting... bad feelings from seller? Look at description
strange
as i said here, someone won this item from this seller in the past,for 300 euors(or so) and ebay cancelled the bidding. i know because i put i a bid on it and received an email form them so i wouldn´t rely on it
Posted: 06 May 2008, 19:42
by cardoman
dtsom wrote:cardoman wrote:Strange... relisting... bad feelings from seller? Look at description
strange
as i said here, someone won this item from this seller in the past,for 300 euors(or so) and ebay cancelled the bidding. i know because i put i a bid on it and received an email form them so i wouldn´t rely on it
Yes I know Diego but is this the same seller we are talking about?
Posted: 06 May 2008, 19:44
by dtsom
cardoman wrote:dtsom wrote:cardoman wrote:Strange... relisting... bad feelings from seller? Look at description
strange
as i said here, someone won this item from this seller in the past,for 300 euors(or so) and ebay cancelled the bidding. i know because i put i a bid on it and received an email form them so i wouldn´t rely on it
Yes I know Diego but is this the same seller we are talking about?
yes Gwen, is the same seller.
i wrote it in a paper because in those days i was behind of that record and i didn´t want to bid if the same seller put the vinyl for selling again
Posted: 08 May 2008, 21:40
by paul
Posted: 08 May 2008, 22:15
by EvilBastard
paul wrote:Here we go again:
clicky
Looks like that sneaky git tried to pass it off as the original until someone pulled him upon it. The position of the record means that you wouldn't be able to see the cross on top of the church, and the size of the picture makes it impossible to see any kind of detail.
Posted: 08 May 2008, 22:23
by sisterstekland
EvilBastard wrote:paul wrote:Here we go again:
clicky
Looks like that sneaky git tried to pass it off as the original until someone pulled him upon it. The position of the record means that you wouldn't be able to see the cross on top of the church, and the size of the picture makes it impossible to see any kind of detail.
seller : Please note - item is being relisted as it has come to my attention that it is not the original release - this is a later issue with a slightly different sleeve pic (the cross on top of the church is not showing on the front sleeve) and different run-out information on the record inner (run-off groove does NOT read "For Spiggy" etc...)
Posted: 19 May 2008, 19:20
by cardoman
Posted: 19 May 2008, 21:50
by stufarq
Presumably the value is considerably lower without the sleeve. (And, of course, with the state of the vinyl.)
Posted: 26 May 2008, 05:53
by Prescott
Seriously, without the sleeve, why bother?
Posted: 26 May 2008, 07:57
by paul
Someone still wanted to pay GBP 31,99 for it though ....
Posted: 26 May 2008, 11:26
by cardoman
paul wrote:
Someone still wanted to pay GBP 31,99 for it though ....
For a double
Posted: 26 May 2008, 17:57
by paul
cardoman wrote:paul wrote:
Someone still wanted to pay GBP 31,99 for it though ....
For a double
... worthless without a sleeve ...
Posted: 26 May 2008, 18:40
by taylor
but if you have a mint sleeve only.....
Posted: 26 May 2008, 18:52
by paul
taylor wrote:but if you have a mint sleeve only.....
then you have a mint sleeve and a scratched record ...
Posted: 27 May 2008, 11:26
by cardoman
paul wrote:taylor wrote:but if you have a mint sleeve only.....
then you have a mint sleeve and a scratched record ...
No bothoring Paul, than you've them all...
Posted: 27 May 2008, 12:35
by Ozpat
Posted: 27 May 2008, 19:23
by paul
cardoman wrote:paul wrote:taylor wrote:but if you have a mint sleeve only.....
then you have a mint sleeve and a scratched record ...
No bothoring Paul, than you've them all...
All I need then is a scratched sleeve
Posted: 27 May 2008, 19:32
by cardoman
paul wrote:cardoman wrote:paul wrote:
then you have a mint sleeve and a scratched record ...
No bothoring Paul, than you've them all...
All I need then is a scratched sleeve
I thought you own one due to your...daughter
