Page 19 of 41

Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 15:03
by EvilBastard

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 00:53
by James Blast

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 09:03
by czuczu
Peter Falk :(

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 13:31
by Being645
czuczu wrote:Peter Falk :(
RIP ... :( ...

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 13:40
by lazarus corporation

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 15:15
by EvilBastard
lazarus corporation wrote:New York state approves gay marriage
Good News: we're the 6th state in the union to do it.
Bad News: IOWA beat us to it. I mean, what the fuck?! :lol:

Posted: 06 Jul 2011, 10:06
by markfiend
Anyone on here give a sh!t about the NotW phone-hacking scandal? No calls for Rebekah Brooks to be jailed for perverting the course of justice?

OK then.

Posted: 06 Jul 2011, 11:19
by Pista
The whole NoTW thing is a disgrace.
How could Brooks not know it was happening?
She was the fcuking editor! Aren't they supposed to have the final say on what gets printed?
Come to that, how could Murdoch not know? I though he knew everything. He practically owns everything (in media anyway).
& it will be interesting to see whether Cameron distances himself from his fellow pond life.
On the plus side, I am impressed by this http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14029033

So far it looks like just Ford have pulled out though

Posted: 06 Jul 2011, 12:02
by timsinister
They're petitioning the DCMS to try and resist the urge to give in to Murdoch's latest power grab...

http://www.avaaz.org/en/murdoch_messages_2/?copy

:von:

Posted: 06 Jul 2011, 12:21
by markfiend
Conrad Black was sent to prison for less.

If it can be shown that Murdoch did know of the phone hacking, particularly phones of government ministers, given that he is a foreign national, I think it would be legitimate to charge him with espionage. :twisted:

Posted: 06 Jul 2011, 12:28
by Pista
Would that mean we could have him put down?
....err....I mean executed

:innocent:

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 17:26
by Pista

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 17:39
by EvilBastard
Pista wrote:Would that mean we could have him put down?
....err....I mean executed

:innocent:
Yes, but if he was executed it would count as countryside...

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 18:38
by Erudite
Pista wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14070733

He closing it!!
Not before bloody time.

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 18:43
by Debaser
And how long before a 'new' one will be brought out.

Sometimes just shutting up shop is the easy cop out I feel. It makes me feel uneasy. They haven't addressed the issue of the nasty pondlife who sanctioned it, paid for it, did it. They are the ones who should be hung out to dry.

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 18:46
by Erudite
Debaser wrote:And how long before a 'new' one will be brought out.

Sometimes just shutting up shop is the easy cop out I feel. It makes me feel uneasy. They haven't addressed the issue of the nasty pondlife who sanctioned it, paid for it, did it. They are the ones who should be hung out to dry.
They should but they never are...

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 19:56
by emilystrange
Domain names thesunonsunday.co.uk and .com were registered two days ago, apparently

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 19:59
by lazarus corporation
Leslie Ash has just told C4 News that her lawyer is asking the Daily Mail to explain how they managed to get personal details about her.

I would pay good money to see the Daily Mail closed too.

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 22:12
by Pista
emilystrange wrote:Domain names thesunonsunday.co.uk and .com were registered two days ago, apparently
Thought they might be.
I was talking to a friend earlier who basically said that the scum on sunday would be out there in a few weeks.

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 22:15
by James Blast
"same old clothes in brand new drag"

Posted: 07 Jul 2011, 22:31
by lazarus corporation
The Guardian just wrote:The closure of the News of the World could be a cunning ploy to legally shred any incriminating evidence linked to the phone hacking scandal, according to a prominent media lawyer.

Mark Stephens, head of media with Finers Stephens Innocent lawyer, said under British law the paper "may not be obliged to retain documents that could be relevant to civil and criminal claims against the newspaper—even in cases that are already underway."
clicky

Posted: 10 Jul 2011, 21:18
by Erudite

Posted: 11 Jul 2011, 11:11
by Pista
NoTW very cryptic Crossword

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... rooks.html
Other answers included: "stench", "racket" and "tart".
:notworthy:

Posted: 13 Jul 2011, 17:55
by lazarus corporation

Posted: 13 Jul 2011, 21:24
by James Blast
top cop bad actor interface
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfI40CF9 ... r_embedded

guilty as sin!