Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 19:05
Aye. Bring it on, Mistah Blast. 
Page 20 of 41
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 19:10
Those pics are stunning. All.
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 21:38
Tis most definitely not! Grab that camera and start shooting again James, those shots deserve itJames Blast wrote:now that Zed's unearthed my camera... should I...
no, it was a silly idea
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 21:44
*Bangs the same drum*Obviousman wrote:Tis most definitely not! Grab that camera and start shooting again James, those shots deserve itJames Blast wrote:now that Zed's unearthed my camera... should I...
no, it was a silly idea
Just think what you could do with the camera and digital processing, James. Go ahead and do it, chum!
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 21:56
I must start again here...
but I fear The Duvel, the day and years of self inflicted damage may produce naff results ~ still, worth a try I suppose
but I fear The Duvel, the day and years of self inflicted damage may produce naff results ~ still, worth a try I suppose
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 21:58
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 22:02
I don't believe you did the gigs you did those photos at without accompanying liquids?James Blast wrote:but I fear The Duvel, the day and years of self inflicted damage may produce naff results ~ still, worth a try I suppose
The shelf, that's just a bit of dust and will be blown off right away
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 22:11
Naff results is what we aim for, Brer Jam~es...
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 22:49
I have 'something' to live up to. I will try, but be prepared for disappointment.
Ye's dae all ken it's analogue, film like, that'll huv tae be taken tae a lab fur processin' cause o' thi "push"? Naw, ye's huvnae a feckin' scooby, huv ye?
It's none o' this digital shite, Oh no!
well eventually it will be, if it's guid enuff
Ye's dae all ken it's analogue, film like, that'll huv tae be taken tae a lab fur processin' cause o' thi "push"? Naw, ye's huvnae a feckin' scooby, huv ye?
It's none o' this digital shite, Oh no!
well eventually it will be, if it's guid enuff
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 22:57
I felt really grand taking a roll of Ilford HP5 to the lab and asking, in a confident voice, to "have it pushed one stop" AND knowing what that meant. I then realised I'd be screwed if they asked me more specific questions so made a hasty withdrawalJames Blast wrote:I have 'something' to live up to. I will try, but be prepared for disappointment.
Ye's dae all ken it's analogue, film like, that'll huv tae be taken tae a lab fur processin' cause o' thi "push"? Naw, ye's huvnae a feckin' scooby, huv ye?
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 23:08
I think my work here is done after that
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 23:13
We've been rumbled!James Blast wrote:Naw, ye's huvnae a feckin' scooby, huv ye?
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 23:16
Seriously though, JB, being a relative newcomer here I'd never seen your gig shots before. Even though you play them down I think they are as good as many I've seen printed and used professionally.
If you only capture 90% of that with a camera again then you'll still be 80% ahead of most.
You owe it to our eyes to get that shutter blinking.........
If you only capture 90% of that with a camera again then you'll still be 80% ahead of most.
You owe it to our eyes to get that shutter blinking.........
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 23:50
For now, I'll stick with the "digital shite".
Posted: 14 Sep 2007, 03:10
Mmmmmmm, contrast.
Posted: 14 Sep 2007, 03:17
Guess again, Brer Blast.James Blast wrote:Ye's dae all ken it's analogue, film like, that'll huv tae be taken tae a lab fur processin' cause o' thi "push"? Naw, ye's huvnae a feckin' scooby, huv ye?
Posted: 14 Sep 2007, 11:47
Please explain then, as I have no clueCarpathian Psychonaut wrote: "have it pushed one stop" AND knowing what that meant.
Made some shots that had the risk of looking good yesterday, will possibly be on later.
Posted: 14 Sep 2007, 11:54
I know what "pushing it a stop" means too. I still dream of setting up a home dark-room at some time in the future.
Posted: 14 Sep 2007, 12:00
As an example, developing a 200 ASA film as if it was a 400 ASA one. A two stop push would be doing it as if two speeds faster ie a 200 ASA film as an 800 one.Obviousman wrote:Please explain then, as I have no clueCarpathian Psychonaut wrote: "have it pushed one stop" AND knowing what that meant.
In effect it tries to make up for the film that was used, though in some it can bring out more obvious grain. This may, of course, be the whole point of doing it though, especially if after some drama. See my first Holga set, including that Sage roof one, for the effect......
Posted: 14 Sep 2007, 12:02
Interesting
Posted: 14 Sep 2007, 12:09
"pushing one stop" can also mean a move to an adjacent station on the same line, as part of the 1974 UK revision of Mornington Crescent rules.
Sorry, I had to mention it.
Sorry, I had to mention it.
Posted: 14 Sep 2007, 19:21
Carpy! 
Posted: 15 Sep 2007, 16:35
Carp
You ever play around with Ilford XP1 ?
For the rest it's a B&W film that can be developed in those 1 hour colour machines.
Gives you some cool tints.
I swear by Ilford for B&W shots.
You ever play around with Ilford XP1 ?
For the rest it's a B&W film that can be developed in those 1 hour colour machines.
Gives you some cool tints.
I swear by Ilford for B&W shots.
Posted: 15 Sep 2007, 16:51
Funnily enough I have two rolls of XP2 Super 120 @ 400 in the fridge right now - that's the high contrast, very forgiving C41-developed one of which you speak. I've also got a roll of HP5 120 @ 400 to try out but I'll need to use a diff lab (ie non-high street).spot778 wrote:Carp
You ever play around with Ilford XP1 ?
For the rest it's a B&W film that can be developed in those 1 hour colour machines.
Gives you some cool tints.
I swear by Ilford for B&W shots.
Ilford is pretty much my film of choice at the moment B&W wise!
Posted: 16 Sep 2007, 15:37
One of my favourite pieces of architecture.