Page 3 of 11
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 17:46
by streamline
DarkAngel wrote:
If the thread was reinstated, you would be able to clearly form your own opinion. But - it has been censored.
You can still see it - it is in the Trash Bin section (accessible from the main page).
Although, to be fair, I don't know how long it stays there.
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 17:50
by scotty
streamline wrote:DarkAngel wrote:
If the thread was reinstated, you would be able to clearly form your own opinion. But - it has been censored.
You can still see it - it is in the Trash Bin section (accessible from the main page).
Although, to be fair, I don't know how long it stays there.
A week..............I think?
This is all very serious and remarkably on thread
, haven't points been made now?, can't we get back to talking nonsensical pointless drively pish...............?
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 17:57
by 9while9
scotty wrote:streamline wrote:DarkAngel wrote:
If the thread was reinstated, you would be able to clearly form your own opinion. But - it has been censored.
You can still see it - it is in the Trash Bin section (accessible from the main page).
Although, to be fair, I don't know how long it stays there.
A week..............I think?
This is all very serious and remarkably on thread
, haven't points been made now?, can't we get back to talking nonsensical pointless drively pish...............?
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 17:57
by canon docre
scotty wrote:
This is all very serious and remarkably on thread
, haven't points been made now?, can't we get back to talking nonsensical pointless drively pish...............?
Yep. I could have a convo about flesh flutes f. ex. Havent seen one for some time now.
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 17:57
by aims
Whoever posted the Nazi reference first
loses
No one was censored. The content of nobody's posts changed. I didn't force anything upon anyone, I merely made the assertion that if the guy was a functioning male, I'd prefer his company. No explicit reference to sexual activity anywhere. I didn't say that it was anything more than an indication of gender and didn't even imply the details of any act, real or imagined. Hell, even the homosexual nature of the comment was
deduced, never stated.
In defending your "right" to express your disgust, you must also uphold my right to disagree with that disgust, something which you seem to have overlooked.
Anyhow, objection to partaking in or observing activities is perfectly justified. No consistent moral system can support the right of two consenting, mentally sound individuals to do whatever they want with each other (seriously, I challenge anyone to define one).
Had I stated something horribly explicit, then 9's response would be acceptable. As it is, I merely alluded to the guy having the right plumbing, ffs. Any man who can say that they're offended by the mention of a dick is, imho, morally obliged to cut his own off, since tolerating it would be inconsistent with his world view.
And now I'm shutting up, because I know I'm right.
Love is the law, ya bastard
[/url]
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:02
by 9while9
Motz wrote:Whoever posted the Nazi reference first
loses
And now I'm shutting up, because I know I'm right.
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:04
by DarkAngel
streamline wrote:DarkAngel wrote:
If the thread was reinstated, you would be able to clearly form your own opinion. But - it has been censored.
You can still see it - it is in the Trash Bin section (accessible from the main page).
Although, to be fair, I don't know how long it stays there.
Thank you
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:04
by scotty
The price of potatoes.........how much?.........Football in the park, 28 a side, final score - 19 - 11, "jumpers for goal posts" is it...mmm...mmm
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:05
by DarkAngel
P.S. Motz, doesn't my eclair look delicious??
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:08
by scotty
DarkAngel wrote:P.S. Motz, doesn't my eclair look delicious??
Is that a pair o' tits on top of it?
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:08
by weebleswobble
Bring back the cakes!
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:08
by 9while9
scotty wrote:The price of potatoes.........how much?.........Football in the park, 28 a side, final score - 19 - 11, "jumpers for goal posts" is it...mmm...mmm
I hate Pikachu's!!!
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:09
by DarkAngel
scotty wrote:DarkAngel wrote:P.S. Motz, doesn't my eclair look delicious??
Is that a pair o' tits on top of it?
You would especially like the legs that go with it.
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:09
by scotty
weebleswobble wrote:Bring back the cakes!
Did you no' see my last post ya fud?
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:11
by weebleswobble
scotty wrote:weebleswobble wrote:Bring back the cakes!
Did you no' see my last post ya fud?
Aye it had
nae cakes
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:11
by aims
9while9 wrote:Motz wrote:Whoever posted the Nazi reference first
loses
And now I'm shutting up, because I know I'm right.
*insert puerile emoticons here*
Thanks for pointing that out, I'll file a bugreport with the phpBB team in due course. For those interested, that happened because BBCode doesn't like apostrophes in URLs - the temporary work around is to use the "%27" escape sequence instead
DarkAngel wrote:P.S. Motz, doesn't my eclair look delicious??
Seems I was wrong. Birds of a feather really
do...
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:12
by DarkAngel
weebleswobble wrote:Bring back the cakes!
Don't you mean...the cheese?????
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:13
by weebleswobble
Here we go again
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:15
by scotty
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:16
by DarkAngel
Motz wrote:9while9 wrote:Motz wrote:Whoever posted the Nazi reference first
loses :roll:
And now I'm shutting up, because I know I'm right.
*insert puerile emoticons here*
Thanks for pointing that out, I'll file a bugreport with the phpBB team in due course. For those interested, that happened because BBCode doesn't like apostrophes in URLs - the temporary work around is to use the "%27" escape sequence instead ;)
DarkAngel wrote:P.S. Motz, doesn't my eclair look delicious?? :lol:
Seems I was wrong. Birds of a feather really
do...:roll:
- A little harsh aren't you. We are trying to have a little fun with you. C'mon, jump in.
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:29
by streamline
What no cheese?
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:31
by Dark
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:38
by Izzy HaveMercy
I'm one of the first members on this forum, and the reason why I'm still here is because it is slightly moderated in a way that everyone can have his/her say.
You learn rather quick where the boundaries lie. If you can't live with that, go somewhere else.
I, too, have crossed boundaries in the past, especially with my heartfelt aversion of R&B music
But I saw I was treading on too many toes and just swallowed my bile.
After all, I'm a grown-up human being, and one of the things you learn with adulthood is that you don't always are right about stuff. And it is rather adult to ADMIT this.
I frequent a plethora of other forums, and this one is just perfectly moderated. Most of the time the censorship is applied correctly.
And it is best to lock a thread BEFORE it starts to become a flamewar, otherwise this becomes the Dominion list all over again. One of the reasons why this forum started in the first place, I thought, was to avoid such things.
So, Quiffy, Mods, you have my full support. You did it in the past, you can still do it now.
If some n00bs come in here and act as if they pwn the place, kick them and send them to boarding school. The same goes for old members, by the way.
This is Quiffy's place. He pays for it, some of us support him. When you thrash the Ming vase in his living room, he kicks you out. If you start whining to the rest about this being unfair, you got a second kicking coming up.
Thank you.
IZ.
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:44
by James Blast
Well said!
Ya Crawly Bum Licking Belgian Baisturt!
Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 18:48
by Izzy HaveMercy
James Blast wrote:Well said!
Ya Crawly Bum Licking Belgian Baisturt!
Thanks.
I was also wondering earlier if I should mention why the Americans have to execute their first Amendement with illegal CIA flights to Europe, but I'm not that kind of person
You can offend anyone on this board, but why should you?
IZ.