Page 3 of 5
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 00:56
by eotunun
Didn´t have my trip over the siderail yet:
Did you know that in germany alone ten times the fund was raised as compared to what rich Saudi Arabia would give to help at least them muslim brothers?
At Troisdorf (seek me on our Frappr map to find the sad spot), a metal concert was given (with me as a helper there) where
Perzonal War,
Sixfinger and
Corr (no longer existing..) scratched up 1000€ to give to
The Greenhelmets (when you ask me why not to bomb my hometown they are about the only good reason which makes it worth leaving it intact as they come from here..), giving a new house/half a fisherboat to some family struck by the flood.
Then there were hundreds of dead tourists that are hardly remembered. Their survivng relatives who depended on them know have indifferent offices to talk to.
The difference was the flood was an act of god. 9/11 inscened by his fans.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 07:38
by nick the stripper
James Blast wrote:youth, oh youth
If you can't joke about terrorism, what can you joke about?
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 16:13
by 9while9
nick the stripper wrote:James Blast wrote:youth, oh youth
If you can't joke about terrorism, what can you joke about?
Your diminishing brain cells......
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 16:28
by nick the stripper
9while9 wrote:nick the stripper wrote:James Blast wrote:youth, oh youth
If you can't joke about terrorism, what can you joke about?
Your diminishing brain cells......
Seriously though, I'd rather joke about something, even in bad taste, than whine and have to be all sorrowful about it. Life's too short.
edit - how big of an affect did this honestly have on you guys? They were simply buildings, and - I'm guessing, considering you all live either in the UK or elsewhere in Europe - that you knew none of the people personally in those buildings.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 16:40
by markfiend
A friend of mine, his twin brother was working in the World Trade Centre during 2001, and only missed being there that day because he was late for work. I know it's a pretty tenuous connection.
The attack scared me quite badly at the time. Like I said, I was convinced GWB would launch a nuclear attack (against whom? I dunno) over the next month or so. Instead he "only" started the unwinnable "war against terror".
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 16:42
by Dark
nick the stripper wrote:Seriously though, I'd rather joke about something, even in bad taste, than whine and have to be all sorrowful about it. Life's too short.
Understood, and agreed with.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 16:54
by weebleswobble
nick the stripper wrote:
edit - how big of an affect did this honestly have on you guys? They were simply buildings, and - I'm guessing, considering you all live either in the UK or elsewhere in Europe - that you knew none of the people personally in those buildings.
Simply buildings? Are you f**king serious??
No I didn't know any of the people, what difference does that make?
Being compassionate for others is part of being human, "Oh look someone being murdered but I don't know them so it's ok"
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 17:24
by Badlander
weebleswobble wrote:nick the stripper wrote:
edit - how big of an affect did this honestly have on you guys? They were simply buildings, and - I'm guessing, considering you all live either in the UK or elsewhere in Europe - that you knew none of the people personally in those buildings.
Simply buildings? Are you f**king serious??
No I didn't know any of the people, what difference does that make?
Being compassionate for others is part of being human, "Oh look someone being murdered but I don't know them so it's ok"
Agreed. I was going to say more or less the same thing.
BTW he who does not show compassion can not expect any from others.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 17:31
by Obviousman
nick the stripper wrote:
edit - how big of an affect did this honestly have on you guys? They were simply buildings, and - I'm guessing, considering you all live either in the UK or elsewhere in Europe - that you knew none of the people personally in those buildings.
At the time the effect was pretty much limited to shock and awe, but afterwards it has become the excuse all despots dreamt of to take away bits of freedom slowly, enforce strict laws, of which we shouldn't be feeling the effect but
are. I think it's more than quite a bit too harsh to wish something like this to happen, even to your worst enemy and even more so considering only about 22% of the Americans voted Bush (and I presume even less New Yorkers?). Therefore I do see this as a bad thing, just as every other attack on whoever/whatever wherever.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 18:05
by 9while9
nick the stripper wrote:9while9 wrote:nick the stripper wrote:
If you can't joke about terrorism, what can you joke about?
Your diminishing brain cells......
Seriously though, I'd rather joke about something, even in bad taste, than whine and have to be all sorrowful about it. Life's too short.
edit - how big of an affect did this honestly have on you guys? They were simply buildings, and - I'm guessing, considering you all live either in the UK or elsewhere in Europe - that you knew none of the people personally in those buildings.
I like you Nick but you need to learn to practice
empathy.
1. the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.
I've read that sociopaths lack this ability.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 18:17
by 9while9
Obviousman wrote:nick the stripper wrote:
edit - how big of an affect did this honestly have on you guys? They were simply buildings, and - I'm guessing, considering you all live either in the UK or elsewhere in Europe - that you knew none of the people personally in those buildings.
At the time the effect was pretty much limited to shock and awe, but afterwards it has become the excuse all despots dreamt of to take away bits of freedom slowly, enforce strict laws, of which we shouldn't be feeling the effect but
are. I think it's more than quite a bit too harsh to wish something like this to happen, even to your worst enemy and even more so considering only about 22% of the Americans voted Bush (and I presume even less New Yorkers?). Therefore I do see this as a bad thing, just as every other attack on whoever/whatever wherever.
Riddle me this: How many balls out terrorist attacks on America in the last 5 years?
An how many do you think America would have had if the government would have been totally passive after 9/11?
Had the government waged a war of words only I believe it would emboldened many more groups of terrorists.
And if you guys need a little comedy on this subject >
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8ItdXy9lxI
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 18:35
by James Blast
Damn, he's good!
if somewhat misguided, but hey, it's comedy...
can't help wondering what Bill Hicks take on it would be
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 18:47
by 9while9
James Blast wrote:Damn, he's good!
if somewhat misguided, but hey, it's comedy...
can't help wondering what Bill Hicks take on it would be
Bill Hicks you say, very funny >
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI79SAvpRGY
Complete derail of thread in progress..........
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 18:57
by aims
9while9 wrote:I like you Nick but you need to learn to practice
empathy.
1. the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.
I've read that sociopaths lack this ability.
Nowhere in your posts do I see any attempt at understanding or rationalising the motives of the attackers. Empathy's not a selective thing.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 19:11
by Dark
I found
Jon Stewart to be pretty damn funny. But then, I likes all these topical funnies, me.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 19:12
by 9while9
Motz wrote:9while9 wrote:I like you Nick but you need to learn to practice
empathy.
1. the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.
I've read that sociopaths lack this ability.
Nowhere in your posts do I see any attempt at understanding or rationalising the motives of the attackers. Empathy's not a selective thing.
Surly your joking.
An intelligent individual would reserve empathy for those who are under duress.Not a spoiled child who acts out because he feels he has been wronged.
Are you upset because you lack the ability to feel empathy?
I do however feel great empathy for those who are ruled by these thugs,
and people who are used in the name of a religion.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 19:13
by Badlander
Motz wrote:9while9 wrote:I like you Nick but you need to learn to practice
empathy.
1. the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.
I've read that sociopaths lack this ability.
Nowhere in your posts do I see any attempt at understanding or rationalising the motives of the attackers. Empathy's not a selective thing.
Ouch ! Good point.
One man's terrorist organisation always is another man's liberation movement.
Which is
no excuse, I know.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 19:14
by James Blast
Nice reply
9w9
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 19:16
by 9while9
Dark wrote:I found
Jon Stewart to be pretty damn funny. But then, I likes all these topical funnies, me.
I liked Stewart in this clip >
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGWlLohPMik
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 19:29
by Dark
A-fuckin'-pproved!
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 19:40
by aims
9while9 wrote:An intelligent individual would reserve empathy for those who are under duress. Not a spoiled child who acts out because he feels he has been wronged.
Unless you made that judgement after a great deal of empathic thinking, then I think my point is very much reinforced.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 19:53
by 9while9
Motz wrote:9while9 wrote:An intelligent individual would reserve empathy for those who are under duress. Not a spoiled child who acts out because he feels he has been wronged.
Unless you made that judgement after a great deal of empathic thinking, then I think my point is very much reinforced.
Interesting exercise in Spin you've got going here, Motz.
Spin Definition: twist and turn so as to give an intended interpretation
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 20:00
by weebleswobble
Motz wrote:9while9 wrote:I like you Nick but you need to learn to practice
empathy.
1. the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.
I've read that sociopaths lack this ability.
Nowhere in your posts do I see any attempt at understanding or rationalising the motives of the attackers. Empathy's not a selective thing.
If you can rationalise flying a plane,
full of innocent people, into a building
full of innocent people then go ahead.
Me? I think you're talking pish......
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 20:03
by 9while9
James Blast wrote:Nice reply
9w9
Why
thank you James,
all ways nice to be appreciated by people you respect.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 20:04
by scotty
weebleswobble wrote:Motz wrote:9while9 wrote:I like you Nick but you need to learn to practice
empathy.
1. the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.
I've read that sociopaths lack this ability.
Nowhere in your posts do I see any attempt at understanding or rationalising the motives of the attackers. Empathy's not a selective thing.
If you can rationalise flying a plane,
full of innocent people, into a building
full of innocent people then go ahead.
Me? I think you're talking pish......
Amen
Stephen , a heinous crime against Humanity how ever you want to dress it up.