Page 3 of 4
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 16:48
by boudicca
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 16:51
by boudicca
We were dancing to "Der Mussolini" as I recall
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 17:49
by emilystrange
smiscandlon wrote:I'm sorry, in what parallel reality is this:
prettier than this:
I guess it would be a boring world if we all liked the same things...
mine. his bits are more relevant to me.
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:18
by smiscandlon
emilystrange wrote:his bits are more relevant to me.
I can't argue with that.
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:21
by christophe
Arch Deviant wrote:
Who is she?
Kate Beckinsale , jummie
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:24
by smiscandlon
Fantastic in Underworld, bloody awful in Van Helsing, I thought.
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:25
by Ramone
markfiend wrote:<mod>People, be careful with the nudey images please... </mod>
Be warned pop pickers the Internal Affairs Bureau are montioring our evey move. Even if they do seem to list their location as LSD and 2 E's..
Seems the I.A.B like to reveal that their location is that of a mind altering drug state but at the same time denounce the naked human form.
As Alanis once said ' Isn't it ironic, don't you think?". That one is accepted, although maybe said in jest but is yet still illegal and the other is not tolerated at all, even in suggestion.
And anyway, we all know that uploading of 'nekid' pictures may indeed appear inappropriate - due to younger eyes maybe watching. But to then condone the use of drugs in the same breath, well that's just down right - wrong. Shame on you Mr Friend, for shame
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:28
by smiscandlon
Not really the issue. The simple fact is that some folks browse the forum at work, and nekid bodies (male or female) on the screen can be glaringly inappropriate if seen from across the office...
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:31
by christophe
smiscandlon wrote:
Fantastic in Underworld, bloody awful in Van Helsing, I thought.
now that’s not strange, Van helsing was a terrible movie all together.
actually I don't like to see her act, she's not that good at all.
@Ramone. eh?
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:31
by weebleswobble
Ramone wrote:markfiend wrote:<mod>People, be careful with the nudey images please... </mod>
Be warned pop pickers the Internal Affairs Bureau are montioring our evey move. Even if they do seem to list their location as LSD and 2 E's..
Seems the I.A.B like to reveal that their location is that of a mind altering drug state but at the same time denounce the naked human form.
As Alanis once said ' Isn't it ironic, don't you think?". That one is accepted, although maybe said in jest but is yet still illegal and the other is not tolerated at all, even in suggestion.
And anyway, we all know that uploading of 'nekid' pictures may indeed appear inappropriate - due to younger eyes maybe watching. But to then condone the use of drugs in the same breath, well that's just down right - wrong. Shame on you Mr Friend, for shame
Don't be such a Fud
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:35
by Ramone
Your missing my point. I agree that posting pics of nude bods is indeed wrong, like you said, work, kids, your wife etc..may be watching. But to actually list your location as LSD in my opinion is just as wreckless.
But, anyway who really cares. This is all to serious, let's get back to slagging off Rosetta Stone..I'll start. If I ever see Porl King again I'm going to ( omitted due to graphic nature) with extreme pain. As for Mr Fiend. He's a cool dude and I was just breaking his balls for a laugh. Hi ohhh
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:36
by Ramone
Whats a FUD?
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:39
by weebleswobble
Ramone wrote:Whats a FUD?
Where have you been?
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:40
by smiscandlon
Ramone wrote:I was just breaking his balls for a laugh.
And breaking balls is not funny.
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:42
by scotty
Ramone wrote:Whats a FUD?
Here's Two..........
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:48
by smiscandlon
Wow, this one has gone quite spectacularly off topic.
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 18:55
by scotty
smiscandlon wrote:Wow, this one has gone quite spectacularly off topic.
I know, how unusual
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 19:17
by Arch Deviant
Oh, the daughter of the wonderful Richard Beckinsale (Rising Damp, Porridge). She's a hun.
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 19:28
by bushman*pm
Ramone wrote:Whats a FUD?
i think its 'Sweaty Sock' for 'cnut' but i could be wrong!
BTW, weird coincidence, just as i read your post & saw your signature
'V.T.' come on my pooter!
oooh, im all spooked out!
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 19:35
by scotty
bushman*pm wrote:Ramone wrote:Whats a FUD?
i think its 'Sweaty Sock' for 'cnut' but i could be wrong!
quote]
Aye.
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 19:40
by bushman*pm
im glad all my trips to Scottieland were not wasted!
(perhaps my wedding there was! dont tell the handbrake tho!)
Posted: 04 Dec 2006, 21:42
by emilystrange
Arch Deviant wrote:
Oh, the daughter of the wonderful Richard Beckinsale (Rising Damp, Porridge). She's a hun.
her father was better
Posted: 05 Dec 2006, 12:30
by markfiend
Ramone wrote:As for Mr Fiend. He's a cool dude and I was just breaking his balls for a laugh. Hi ohhh
Cheers Mr Ramone, you're a gent. I saw the funny side.
Just because I happen to put my location as an anagram doesn't mean I'm condoning anything though.
Posted: 05 Dec 2006, 21:36
by timsinister
smiscandlon wrote:Wow, this one has gone quite spectacularly off topic.
Great, isn't it? Probably the only reason
I'm still alive.
Posted: 05 Dec 2006, 21:45
by weebleswobble
timsinister wrote:smiscandlon wrote:Wow, this one has gone quite spectacularly off topic.
Great, isn't it? Probably the only reason
I'm still alive.
At least until
Friday 