Page 3 of 4
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 16:22
by boudicca
EvilBastard wrote:Bit off-topic there, I think. You want to be posting in the
Photographs thread, or possibly start your own - perhaps you might like to call it "Dozy Twunt reads one bit of politically-suspect literature and thinks that posting stuff on message boards is a good move".
That topic's a bit long though, isn't it - why not just stick with "I'm a dozy twunt," brevity being the soul of wit and everything.
EDIT - that being said, any twunt silly enough to be posting pictures from David Horowitz's website devoted to an organization that counts Christopher Hitchens, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Bill O’Reilly among it's fans probably ought to be buried up to his neck and stoned to death, pour encourager les autres if nothing else.
And someone should buy the designer of that poster the Photoshop manual - my cat could do better, although he does have opposable thumbs, something which I understand Mr. Horowitz doesn't.
Oh man, it's been so long. Seems she's getting ever more militant.
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 17:11
by D.A.
(Graphic photo of burned, mutilated woman
here.)
It seems as though these women are the real dogs....but if I know this herd, (ironically and most especially the femmes) they will claim it is my posting which inflames rather than be concerned about the horrible violence against women in the middle east.
http://www.rawa.org/women_north.htm
Sinnie sez: be careful, D.A.
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 18:03
by James Blast
... and your point caller?
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 19:10
by EvilBastard
D.A. wrote:(Graphic photo of burned, mutilated woman
here.)
It seems as though these women are the real dogs....but if I know this herd, (ironically and most especially the femmes) they will claim it is my posting which inflames rather than be concerned about the horrible violence against women in the middle east.
http://www.rawa.org/women_north.htm
Posting pictures of burned and mutilated women doesn't count as doing something about the problem. If there's an issue that concerns you, and you want to bring it to peoples' attentions, then there are better ways of doing in than those that you seem to favour.
"Horrible violence against women in the middle east" is a bit of a broad brush (not to mention tautological - isn't all violence horrible?) - you might want to be a little more specific. Who's commiting the violence, where and why is it being committed, which organizations are seeking to change the situation, and more importantly, what options are open to the average person if they wanted to do something about it.
PS And trust me - David Horowitz isn't particularly interested in doing anything about the problem of "horrible violence against women in the middle east". He's far more concerned about getting his phys on TV, probably with a view to running for or holding high office in the near future.
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 19:50
by James Blast
I prefer you when you're drinking beer EB
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 19:52
by EvilBastard
James Blast wrote:I prefer you when you're drinking beer EB
Well buy us a pint, then!
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 19:54
by James Blast
make me
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 19:56
by EvilBastard
James Blast wrote:make me
You mentioned elsewhere that you've yet to get a shag out of this forum - buy me a pint and I won't break your streak
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 19:59
by James Blast
Ok, you smell nice
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 20:23
by eotunun
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 21:36
by Andie
swerving this slightly back on topic...
http://tinyurl.com/2ntj5o (tinyurl'd by markfiend)
Jeremy Vine listen again linky...yep...they were on Radio 2
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 22:00
by EvilBastard
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 22:02
by 6FeetOver
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 22:12
by James Blast
RTTT
can I just say they look like Goth-Chavs?
I think it's their gait and expressions, I mean they're nothing like any of us...
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 22:15
by psichonaut
James Blast wrote:RTTT
can I just say they look like Goth-Chavs?
I think it's their gait and expressions, I mean they're nothing like any of us...
....we are in denial....now
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 22:19
by James Blast
no not really but you are a Foreign, so I'll let it go
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 22:25
by boudicca
James Blast wrote:RTTT
can I just say they look like Goth-Chavs?
I think it's their gait and expressions, I mean they're nothing like any of us...
Indeed... there's a world of difference between your corn-fed free range
Bearsden goth and your bog standard
Maryhill goth, most notably the latter has a big blue mark on their forehead from having the heid put in them
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 22:29
by Big Si
boudicca wrote:James Blast wrote:RTTT
can I just say they look like Goth-Chavs?
I think it's their gait and expressions, I mean they're nothing like any of us...
Indeed... there's a world of difference between your corn-fed free range
Bearsden goth and your bog standard
Maryhill goth, most notably the latter has a big blue mark on their forehead from having the heid put in them
Ye dinnae get Goths fae Maryhill
Now, as for Hillhead .......
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 22:39
by 6FeetOver
James Blast wrote:RTTT
can I just say they look like Goth-Chavs?
I think it's their gait and expressions, I mean they're nothing like any of us...
Erm...I hate to break it to you, dear
Blast, but that's pretty much what g*th looks like in 2008...even here in Chicago! It's essentially stuff like platform boots and "industrial"-looking clothing, rather than anything akin to the aesthetic sensibilities of the g*thic look as it appeared in the 1980s...
No one does winklepickers and frills 'round here anymore, that's for sure.
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 22:56
by psichonaut
here goth wasn't the same in GB in the 80's as is different now....we looked dark and nothing else, nothing in common with cyber-goth or industrial or with any aesthetic reason....we all was "sad" of our living condition, but only letting life sliding on us and letting the other poeple see our state of soul.
today goth, in Italy, looks only a way to be admired, to say "hey WE are different"
....and those 2 english goths want only be admired....if i found that news item i'd only thought:"pppffftt....exhibitionists"
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 23:02
by James Blast
there are Chavs even in Chicago...
well I never...
Chivcago
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 23:04
by 6FeetOver
There're probably "chavs" everywhere, Blast.
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 23:30
by alice
SINsister wrote:
No one does winklepickers and frills 'round here anymore, that's for sure.
Sad thing - love 'em
Posted: 25 Jan 2008, 23:37
by James Blast
SINsister wrote:There're probably "chavs" everywhere, Blast.
Trailer Park Chavs does have a ring to it
and
yirsel!
Posted: 26 Jan 2008, 09:32
by Pista
SINsister wrote:James Blast wrote:RTTT
can I just say they look like Goth-Chavs?
I think it's their gait and expressions, I mean they're nothing like any of us...
Erm...I hate to break it to you, dear
Blast, but that's pretty much what g*th looks like in 2008...even here in Chicago! It's essentially stuff like platform boots and "industrial"-looking clothing, rather than anything akin to the aesthetic sensibilities of the g*thic look as it appeared in the 1980s...
No one does winklepickers and frills 'round here anymore, that's for sure.
& don't forget to mention the glow sticks