Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:28
I'll never be able to comprehend the lust for putting a bullet into something (or someone).
Fair enough, I don't understand people who bungee jump, sky dive, pot hole.................don't want to stop them................don't want people to shoot each other either though.SINsister wrote:I'll never be able to comprehend the lust for putting a bullet into something (or someone).
It is already.............despite gun control.........if people want them.........they'll get them............it's people who want them for criminality that can get them easiest though, that's the problem.emilystrange wrote:no, it won't, scotty, if gun control becomes as per US. it'll be fashion here, like the stupid car spoilers and ridiculous stereos. a good night out? crappy dance music, hair gel, chains, and gun in pocket.
They wouldn't get them, I've had a Shotgun Certificate since I was 15 & a Firearms Certificate from 17, it's a nightmare trying to get/keep them, and rightly so...................but I could drive to Inverness and get a Semi Auto Pistlol from Croatia + 10 Bullets for £100, how would stopping me from having guns for my job stop a Ned from Inverness getting a gun?.emilystrange wrote:yeah, but it's not all of them.
imagine if all of them had one? i'm not talking about criminals here.
Bungee jumping and sky diving can pretty much only go awry for the person doing the jumping/diving, though. Unless the jumper/diver lands on someone or something, no one else is harmed, killed, or endangered in the process. Not exactly the same with gun-toting, innit.scotty wrote:Fair enough, I don't understand people who bungee jump, sky dive...
OK, I was just trying to making a point, prohibition don't work.SINsister wrote:Bungee jumping and sky diving can pretty much only go awry for the person doing the jumping/diving, though. Unless the jumper/diver lands on someone or something, no one else is harmed, killed, or endangered in the process. Not exactly the same with gun-toting, innit.scotty wrote:Fair enough, I don't understand people who bungee jump, sky dive...
it seems too lateSyberberg wrote:So would the USA be a less violent society if guns were strictly controlled/removed from the streets?
Thanks, my coffee just sought exit from my mouth via my nose. Still, at least it cleared out the snot.psichonaut wrote:it seems too lateSyberberg wrote:So would the USA be a less violent society if guns were strictly controlled/removed from the streets?
Eh? - and here's me thinking our Sinful Priestess didn't dabble in politics? ...SINsister wrote:Not funny, man. I'll take either one of 'em over the embarrassing nightmare we've had here for so many years now, ffs.
though surprisingly difficult to hand-cuff.itnAklipse wrote:A population without arms is much easier to gain total control over.
I do miss you Leeeastmidswhizzkid wrote:though surprisingly difficult to hand-cuff.itnAklipse wrote:A population without arms is much easier to gain total control over.
Is' n't it a statistic that in countries where guns are illegal then murder rate is low.Syberberg wrote:So would the USA be a less violent society if guns were strictly controlled/removed from the streets?
Dunno - but it is a lot tougher to kill someone solely using one's bare hands (or a knife, etc.)...Gollum's Cock wrote:Is' n't it a statistic that in countries where guns are illegal then murder rate is low.
I just realised by the way that itnaklipse loves guns and hates Jews
one left hand is a present president your country. btw I'm left hand and I'm proud of it .sultan2075 wrote:
Only if she's both blind and left-handed.