Page 3 of 3

Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:28
by 6FeetOver
I'll never be able to comprehend the lust for putting a bullet into something (or someone). :von:

Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:34
by scotty
SINsister wrote:I'll never be able to comprehend the lust for putting a bullet into something (or someone). :von:
Fair enough, I don't understand people who bungee jump, sky dive, pot hole.................don't want to stop them................don't want people to shoot each other either though.

Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:34
by emilystrange
no, it won't, scotty, if gun control becomes as per US. it'll be fashion here, like the stupid car spoilers and ridiculous stereos. a good night out? crappy dance music, hair gel, chains, and gun in pocket.

Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:37
by scotty
emilystrange wrote:no, it won't, scotty, if gun control becomes as per US. it'll be fashion here, like the stupid car spoilers and ridiculous stereos. a good night out? crappy dance music, hair gel, chains, and gun in pocket.
It is already.............despite gun control.........if people want them.........they'll get them............it's people who want them for criminality that can get them easiest though, that's the problem.

Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:39
by emilystrange
yeah, but it's not all of them.
imagine if all of them had one? i'm not talking about criminals here.

Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:43
by scotty
emilystrange wrote:yeah, but it's not all of them.
imagine if all of them had one? i'm not talking about criminals here.
They wouldn't get them, I've had a Shotgun Certificate since I was 15 & a Firearms Certificate from 17, it's a nightmare trying to get/keep them, and rightly so...................but I could drive to Inverness and get a Semi Auto Pistlol from Croatia + 10 Bullets for £100, how would stopping me from having guns for my job stop a Ned from Inverness getting a gun?.

Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:46
by 6FeetOver
scotty wrote:Fair enough, I don't understand people who bungee jump, sky dive...
Bungee jumping and sky diving can pretty much only go awry for the person doing the jumping/diving, though. Unless the jumper/diver lands on someone or something, no one else is harmed, killed, or endangered in the process. Not exactly the same with gun-toting, innit.

Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:47
by scotty
SINsister wrote:
scotty wrote:Fair enough, I don't understand people who bungee jump, sky dive...
Bungee jumping and sky diving can pretty much only go awry for the person doing the jumping/diving, though. Unless the jumper/diver lands on someone or something, no one else is harmed, killed, or endangered in the process. Not exactly the same with gun-toting, innit.
OK, I was just trying to making a point, prohibition don't work.

Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 23:53
by psichonaut
neither permission works

Posted: 16 Feb 2008, 00:45
by Syberberg
So would the USA be a less violent society if guns were strictly controlled/removed from the streets?

Posted: 16 Feb 2008, 00:46
by psichonaut
Syberberg wrote:So would the USA be a less violent society if guns were strictly controlled/removed from the streets?
it seems too late ;D

Posted: 16 Feb 2008, 01:16
by Syberberg
psichonaut wrote:
Syberberg wrote:So would the USA be a less violent society if guns were strictly controlled/removed from the streets?
it seems too late ;D
Thanks, my coffee just sought exit from my mouth via my nose. Still, at least it cleared out the snot. ;D

Posted: 16 Feb 2008, 03:19
by reactiv8
SINsister wrote:Not funny, man. I'll take either one of 'em over the embarrassing nightmare we've had here for so many years now, ffs. :evil: :von:
Eh? - and here's me thinking our Sinful Priestess didn't dabble in politics? ...

One and all against the wall I say!

- Politicians? We get what we deserve ...

Posted: 17 Feb 2008, 17:03
by eastmidswhizzkid
itnAklipse wrote:A population without arms is much easier to gain total control over.
though surprisingly difficult to hand-cuff. :innocent:

Posted: 17 Feb 2008, 19:26
by 6FeetOver
:eek:

:lol:

:notworthy:

Posted: 17 Feb 2008, 21:37
by scotty
eastmidswhizzkid wrote:
itnAklipse wrote:A population without arms is much easier to gain total control over.
though surprisingly difficult to hand-cuff. :innocent:
:lol: :lol: I do miss you Lee :lol: :lol: :notworthy: :notworthy: :von: :von:

Posted: 17 Feb 2008, 22:16
by GC
Syberberg wrote:So would the USA be a less violent society if guns were strictly controlled/removed from the streets?
Is' n't it a statistic that in countries where guns are illegal then murder rate is low.

I just realised by the way that itnaklipse loves guns and hates Jews :eek:

Posted: 17 Feb 2008, 22:18
by 6FeetOver
Gollum's Cock wrote:Is' n't it a statistic that in countries where guns are illegal then murder rate is low.

I just realised by the way that itnaklipse loves guns and hates Jews :eek:
Dunno - but it is a lot tougher to kill someone solely using one's bare hands (or a knife, etc.)...

And aye. :evil: :urff:

Posted: 17 Feb 2008, 22:26
by Bartek
sultan2075 wrote:
Only if she's both blind and left-handed.
one left hand is a present president your country. btw I'm left hand and I'm proud of it ;D .

this is a very taught decision choosing between someone who's in politic for 4 years and someone who's husband was a president.
vote for ficus