Page 3 of 6
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 07:43
by reactiv8
psichonaut wrote: I prefer 15 mins of "real" sex
"real" being the operative word ... Surely p*rn is for those who lack imagination (& a 'partner' of course)? For some it is actually dangerous - 'encouraging' them to assault innocent folk. Perhaps a better analogy (that is not a pun!) is between cooking/eating and reading recipe books? i.e. Food P*rn - there is plenty of that around too ... Travel P*rn, Sport P*rn etc. too ...
Your turn ...
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 10:10
by Hexe Luciferia
boudicca wrote:He's Italian, Debs.
What's wrong with us italians sex*al habits? Eh? Eh???
(just jocking, dear
)
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 10:53
by psichonaut
she never "tried" an italian lover, if not.....
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 10:56
by eldorado69
I love watching porn, especially on a Sunday morning
[/img]
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 11:09
by Hexe Luciferia
Honestly, it's been a while since I watched some p0rn... don't really need it, though, to be fair...
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 11:22
by psichonaut
eldorado69 wrote:I love watching porn, especially on a Sunday morning
[/img]
...but not alone ...i hope
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 11:36
by eldorado69
psichonaut wrote:eldorado69 wrote:I love watching porn, especially on a Sunday morning
[/img]
...but not alone ...i hope
Always as there is no need if I am with someone
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 11:49
by psichonaut
eldorado69 wrote:psichonaut wrote:eldorado69 wrote:I love watching porn, especially on a Sunday morning
[/img]
...but not alone ...i hope
Always as there is no need if I am with someone
watching porn alone is pretty "sad"....with someone you can "try" what you're watching
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 12:29
by Erudite
My opinion of porn is pretty similar to my opinion of football - while I don't mind kicking an inflated pig's bladder around (what strange perversion is this, you ask?) I'll be damned if I'm gonna watch someone else (or indeed pay for privilage) doing it!
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 12:38
by Dark
reactiv8 wrote:psichonaut wrote: I prefer 15 mins of "real" sex
"real" being the operative word ... Surely p*rn is for those who lack imagination (& a 'partner' of course)? For some it is actually dangerous - 'encouraging' them to assault innocent folk. Perhaps a better analogy (that is not a pun!) is between cooking/eating and reading recipe books? i.e. Food P*rn - there is plenty of that around too ... Travel P*rn, Sport P*rn etc. too ...
Your turn ...
Okay, I wasn't going to rise to it, but I will.
Porn isn't for people who lack imagination. That's like saying reading a book is for people who are too stupid to make their own stories up.
I've heard the "encouraging violence" argument a million times, and not once have I, or anyone I know who watches porn to any extent, decided to assault someone, sexually or otherwise, as a consequence.
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 13:15
by timsinister
Hexe Luciferia wrote:boudicca wrote:He's Italian, Debs.
What's wrong with us italians sex*al habits? Eh? Eh???
(just
jocking, dear
)
Superb misspell.
Superb thread!
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 14:22
by Brideoffrankenstein
The pr0n I've seen just makes me laugh to be totally honest
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 14:42
by DerekR
Brideoffrankenstein wrote:The pr0n I've seen just makes me laugh to be totally honest
Didn't realize my home movies had been You-tubed
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 15:09
by timsinister
We're not back on the beanbags already, are we?
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 15:57
by Hexe Luciferia
timsinister wrote:Hexe Luciferia wrote:boudicca wrote:He's Italian, Debs.
What's wrong with us italians sex*al habits? Eh? Eh???
(just
jocking, dear
)
Superb misspell.
Superb thread!
Oh Gawd!
Freudian slip, I s'pose
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 16:13
by Honeythorn
Porn bores me, end of. I actually would prefer to lurk around on here than watch any.
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 17:45
by Ozpat
psichonaut wrote:she never "tried" an italian lover, if not.....
All curiosity will have gone after your 15 minutes remark...
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 19:02
by psichonaut
Ozpat wrote:psichonaut wrote:she never "tried" an italian lover, if not.....
All curiosity will have gone after your 15 minutes remark...
...but they are 15 mins spent in a good way
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 19:07
by 6FeetOver
15 minutes?! Good grief, that's almost an insult. It'd better be at least an
hour, or it's not worth it, imho.
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 19:17
by psichonaut
SINsister wrote:15 minutes?! Good grief, that's almost an insult. It'd better be at least an
hour, or it's not worth it, imho.
......this is the reason why you still are single?
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 19:20
by timsinister
*grabs tin hat and heads for the bunker*
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 19:38
by 6FeetOver
psichonaut wrote:SINsister wrote:15 minutes?! Good grief, that's almost an insult. It'd better be at least an
hour, or it's not worth it, imho.
......this is the reason why you still are single?
No, actually. I'm single because (unfortunately, I suppose) I've got a pair of working eyes, a highly-functioning brain, and a rather weak stomach. You do the math.
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 20:02
by psichonaut
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 20:16
by Dark
SINsister wrote:15 minutes?! Good grief, that's almost an insult. It'd better be at least an
hour, or it's not worth it, imho.
Depends what you're doing. But in general, thereabouts, yes.
Posted: 23 Mar 2008, 20:28
by boudicca
Do we all keep a little stop-watch handy beside our beds then?