My two pence worth.
For many year I was in awe of the UFO phenomenon . From hearing of the supposed CIA involvement in the movie Close encounters of the third kind as part of their 'indoctrination program' - Dr J. Allen Hyneck, one of the men behind Project Blue Book even makes a cameo and was the 'movies adviser'. To telephoning directly Walter Haut,the man who drafted the press release that was sent out from Roswell Air force base and told the world that the USAF had captured a Flying saucer.
I've seen hundreds of blurry photos, read many 'accounts' from witnesses and seen the grainy video footage and I'm yet to be fully convinced. Even if they are from retired Pilots and policemen.
But I do take notice when Governments, Astronauts, National air forces and even NASA start to come forward and present evidence they themselves cannot fathom.
Case in point, In 1989, the Belgian Air force released at a press conference cockpit radar footage of an object that violated their air space and out flew their own jets and then dropped 10,000 feet in four seconds. A maneuver that would kill a human pilot. They didn't release the footage for ' kicks and giggles' they did so because they claimed they had no idea what it was that flying through their air space for which they had no defence against.
China, Iraq, France, Germany, Britain and since the cold war Russia have all presented footage of objects that have entered their air space with no explanation.
Is this evidence enough? Of course not. Radars can malfunction, people can be deceived by their own eyes.
A man called David Sereda conducted a six year investigation using over 400 hours of raw NASA footage and correspondence with the very Astro physicists and engineers who put the space shuttles into action and askef for their conclusions on the footage. In the 1990's before we all had Sky and every one was a junior Fox Mulder, NASA used to 'beam back' their m*****n footage raw and uncensored, and anyone with the correct equipment could 'download and tape' it too.
Using the visible spectrum that we all have we cannot detect certain things, objects that give off great amounts of energy, energy that would be needed to traverse space,but using NASA's cameras that film in the near ultra violet, the footage is astounding. From objects passing behind the Space lab and the Soyeuz space station to objects traveling at an estimated 25,000 mph on the fringes of our atmosphere - it;'s not a case of 'why don't they just land on the White House Lawn' it's more of a case maybe they have, we just can't see them.
No, I'm not a fan of Eric Von Daniken or nor do I believe they are here amongst us but in another form! But I do firmly believe they are here and they have been for a very long time ( yes I know that's from the X Files)
Evidence a case for Nasa UFO's. A very thought provoking and well constructed piece of investigation.
Plus, Google the the Dropa Stones. They're not a dodgy goth band, they are evidence that we may of been visited by some of the craft / objects that appear on the NASA tapes. You may shrug ya shoulders but it's worth a look all the same.
But to answer the original question about the moon landings being hoaxed..the answer if of course. Why have they not been back for decades and why don't they just do it again , but using the exact same materials and technology they used back in 1969?
If I was a billionaire, I would throw the money at them and say to them -- go on then do it again ya bastards!!!
