Page 3 of 3
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 21:47
by Pista
James Blast wrote:I actually think they could make a fist of it - I've still got Desinto on, The Mum if asked me if I had to have it on so loud and I said sorry, turned it down then had to turn it back up and tell her "Yes!" I did need it on that loud!
As you would say
Revr'nd
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 21:54
by James Blast
oh aye
Revr'nd
Indeedy!
somethings are jist that way
Steve, we can do nowt about them
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 22:24
by christophe
Bartek wrote:nice way of thinking but consider that: we're moving forward because among us are people who does not care about 'sacred' things. even in music.
James Blast wrote:okay, my turn first Mr. 'Foreigns' -
take a very precious album you hold dear that delivers a new experience every time you play it... k?
then imagine a band you hate having a go at covering it
I have more problems with tribute bands that are trying ever so hard to bring the real deal
not even a real band can recreate something they written before, everything evolves, even them. (okey except for the Cure, trilogy was ace
) I hear the Roger Waters Tour is really good, but you will argee it is not The Pink Floyd.
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 22:53
by Pista
christophe wrote: I hear the Roger Waters Tour is really good, but you will argee it is not The Pink Floyd.
No. It isn't. But you will agree that Roger Waters was key to making The Pink Floyd what they were.
Although he trots out good versions of Floyd stuff (I saw him in Budapest on his tour), he can't do it all himself.
His band are good. But not
that good.
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 23:08
by Mrs RicheyJames
Pista wrote:[
There are hundreds of covers of The Cure songs out there.
Most are sh!te but some are passable & one or two are actually better than the originals..
Go away and think about what you just said.
Repeat after me,
no-one does a Cure song better than the Cure...
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 23:19
by Pista
Mrs RicheyJames wrote:Pista wrote:[
There are hundreds of covers of The Cure songs out there.
Most are sh!te but some are passable & one or two are actually better than the originals..
Go away and think about what you just said.
Repeat after me,
no-one does a Cure song better than the Cure...
Marry me.
Oh, hang on. You're already hitched.
Next life then.
Posted: 25 Dec 2009, 10:03
by Bartek
James Blast wrote:Well!?
i think as you i got not much to do so i wasted my time on pointless discus. and btw. I'm checking people reactions. yeah i know, it's stupid checking this on threads that is more about emotions/feelings than everything else.
@
CureBoi: so you say that Mr Waters can do everything by his own, so what about this small band form west Yorkshire? ok there voice of the band left but i'm afraid that many of old fans hate this incarnation.
Posted: 25 Dec 2009, 11:38
by Pista
Bartek wrote:
@ CureBoi: so you say that Mr Waters can do everything by his own, so what about this small band form west Yorkshire? ok there voice of the band left but i'm afraid that many of old fans hate this incarnation.
& you are quite right.
Posted: 25 Dec 2009, 14:51
by boudicca
You're wrong about Comfortably Numb though Steve. The Sisters made it EVEN BETTER
Posted: 25 Dec 2009, 15:05
by James Blast
see me after class Lil' Missy
Posted: 25 Dec 2009, 19:58
by Pista
James Blast wrote:see me after class Lil' Missy
Join the queue.
Posted: 25 Dec 2009, 20:44
by Being645
Pista wrote:How about The Cure covering it?
Let The Cure cover what they will ... as long as they don't attempt to cover
The Sisters ...
Posted: 25 Dec 2009, 21:09
by Pista
Being645 wrote:Pista wrote:How about The Cure covering it?
Let The Cure cover what they will ... as long as they don't attempt to cover
The Sisters ...
The Cure are pretty crap at covers tbh.
Posted: 25 Dec 2009, 23:19
by Izzy HaveMercy
Pink Floyd is good but I discovered that most people giving me lectures about what THEY think *I* have to like or 'you are not into music at all' are mostly 40-something-going-to-85.
Pink Floyd (note not-die-hard-fanboi-spelling) are absolutely great, but I got the new Porcupine Tree 'The Incident' today and god, is that powerful! The Pink Floyd allusions are all on there, inches thick, but they took that sound and juggled with it and took it BEYOND.
Still when I hear TDSOTM or in my case 'The Wall' I am thinking 'man, in THOSE days they ought to have been really progressive and they even might have shaken a lot of people'.
But I am today more impressed with what PT do instead of what Pink Floyd did a couple (!) of years ago. Maybe because I was born in the seventies instead of spending my twenties in it, I dunno.
I have a severe disgust for people who let me choose between the Beatles and the Stones, for example. I meet them a lot, because most people I meet know I am a musician, so they address me after their 20th pint and ask 'hey, rockstar, who'd'yafink is da best band EVER? The Beatles or the Stones?' I answer: 'Neither, they are both crap'. They answer: 'ah, kid, you know nothing about music'. Me: 'I don't need to know, I PLAY it'.
Just to say, some bands are very important for people because they were a revelation in their time.
I have the same with 16-years-old talking about 'Kill 'em All', or 'Raining Blood'. And I go "Hey, what are YOU talking about, smartass, you weren't even born yet!".
Then again, everyone has a right at an opinion.
And covers are, most of the time, a tribute to this or that band. You don't have to like it of course, but you should be proud that the younger generation still think a band of your generation is still popular enough to cover a song of...
IZ.
Posted: 26 Dec 2009, 00:16
by christophe
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:And covers are, most of the time, a tribute to this or that band. You don't have to like it of course, but you should be proud that the younger generation still think a band of your generation is still popular enough to cover a song of...
IZ.
fact.
but on the other hand I wonder why a bind like FL would want to cover Pink Floyd, one song oke why not, but an entire album?
it comes over very cheap to me, it isn't exactly a bold move and it is not like they are trying to get into a totally different audience. to make a reggae cover, or a babysounds cover, or a blackmetal cover... it might be even funny and interesting. but I can't see what FL can add.
that is the only reason why they should or should not, not because it is
sacred
Posted: 26 Dec 2009, 00:28
by Izzy HaveMercy
Maybe... they... REALLY...like... Pink Floyd?
IZ.
Re: Jeeziz Gawd! is nothing sacred?
Posted: 26 Dec 2009, 00:37
by Francis
James Blast wrote:that awful band (we're in RHCP/RATm territory here) the Flaming Lips have decided to cover The Dark Side of the Moon by Thee Pink Floyd!
Henry Rollins and Peaches (?) are involved
are they mental?
http://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/the-da ... d346025381
I'm so upset, I'm going to bed till 2010
s**t happens. Unfortunately. Chill James. There will be plenty more warm nights to make crop circles in Wiltshire.
Posted: 26 Dec 2009, 11:09
by Pista
Everyone's right, of course.
It is a good testament to how much feeling some music can evoke in folks though.
@Iz.
You're not wrong about The Incident.
I haven't heard that much Pink Floyd come out of PT since Voyage 34 (surprised they never got hauled up in court for that one tbh).
Posted: 26 Dec 2009, 11:48
by James Blast
and Breathe...
Posted: 26 Dec 2009, 15:58
by timsinister
The girlfriend's brother played this to me, synching it with the end of 2001, very atmospheric!
I'm reluctant to see this happen, because I know how a cover can sabotage a good song - and this particular item is more than a song!
Fingers crossed they don't utterly screw it.
Posted: 26 Dec 2009, 16:09
by James Blast
they didn't screw it, they totally fucked it up, eat it, sicked it up and did the whole 2G1C routine with it
I shall hunt them down and stab them
Posted: 27 Dec 2009, 22:35
by Big Si
Posted: 27 Dec 2009, 22:59
by James Blast
I see good spirits, I see bad spirits
and far too many words