Posted: 01 Mar 2010, 00:02
moses wrote:
Massive Attack - Blue Lines
moses wrote:
Massive Attack - Blue Lines
Hello!Hollylicious wrote:And yes, I bite..hard.
Don't be afraid to come say hi tho :]
An excellent list - if you were over 40. But no use to me when I'm trying to engage with my 20 year old son. Any idea who Towers of London are?Lest23 wrote:Hmm...Well, I'm 16... Definately under 30...
David Bowie would probably be highest on my list.
Uhmm some others...
Joy Division
Bob Dylan
Ministry
The Velvet Underground
Johnny Cash
Lou Reed
Iggy Pop
Cabaret Voltaire
Tom Waits
Leonard Cohen
Bauhaus/Daniel Ash
Public Image Ltd.
Uhmm, there's more, but those are the first that come to mind when you say...influential
Hellobtw, I'm new on this forum *waves* hiya
Newish Sisters fan.
darkparticle wrote:Hellobtw, I'm new on this forum *waves* hiya
Newish Sisters fan.
Obviously for his multi-layered lyrical genius.
I went to see Sunn O))) play live a few weeks back and after the gig I came back wanting to listen to lots of Loop once my ears finally stopped ringingHom_Corleone wrote:If I was in a band I'd use Loop as a blueprint.
I was thinking about it the other day, and it seems to me there hasn't been any new rock music genre since neo metal (which, unfortunately, was and still is pure wank), and, before that, grunge.Being645 wrote: Still I wonder, whether there has been any real development (not only) in music since the 70ies and 80ies and if so - in what direction?
I'm not convinced but the pun's hilarious.Bartek wrote:except few tracks of Deaftons.
i listen their cover of Cocteau Twins and i must say that it had more power and energy that original. and i'm not a fan of this twa bands.Badlander wrote:I'm not convinced but the pun's hilarious.Bartek wrote:except few tracks of Deaftons.
I hope it's something like this -boudicca wrote:I propose a new genre of Acid-Skiffle... that would shake things up a bit.
... really progressive ...moses wrote:I hope it's something like this -boudicca wrote:I propose a new genre of Acid-Skiffle... that would shake things up a bit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwajvDYd728
I think I'll need a more objective analysis than that if I'm going to convince him that Punk still smells funny...weebleswobble wrote:Yes and they are shyte
Hmm, I seeFrancis wrote:Lest23 wrote:Hmm...Well, I'm 16... Definately under 30...
David Bowie would probably be highest on my list.
Uhmm some others...
Joy Division
Bob Dylan
Ministry
The Velvet Underground
Johnny Cash
Lou Reed
Iggy Pop
Cabaret Voltaire
Tom Waits
Leonard Cohen
Bauhaus/Daniel Ash
Public Image Ltd.
Uhmm, there's more, but those are the first that come to mind when you say...influential
An excellent list - if you were over 40. But no use to me when I'm trying to engage with my 20 year old son. Any idea who Towers of London are?
The Birthday Party were better.Lest23 wrote:how about Nick Cave? My 19 year old cousin is a big fan....I am too, a huge fan, although my taste seems hardly age appropriate so....
Is that because Eldritch said the Sisters where better than The Birthday Party? When they so obviously aren't better than The Bad Seeds or Grindermanmh wrote:The Birthday Party were better.Lest23 wrote:how about Nick Cave? My 19 year old cousin is a big fan....I am too, a huge fan, although my taste seems hardly age appropriate so....
We all know the Doc-hat, but not sure about the Dolls, though he's more likely to know them than anything contemporary. Oasis always seem to win. I blame myself. Too much Champagne Supernova in his early years.Lest23 wrote:does he like The Libertines? Or New York Dolls? Not a huge fan of the Libertines, but I like New York Dolls