Page 3 of 3
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 20:24
by Andrew S
Big Si wrote:
Poor Colin Baker never stood a chance. I agree I thought Sly was very good, but No. 1 Doc of all time has to be -
Yes, he's a predictable choice for favourite Doctor but he is mine too. His autobiography is well worth a read. Made me laugh out loud on the train many times.
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 20:33
by Brideoffrankenstein
Big Si wrote:Colin Baker
Tom Baker reminds me of my old headteacher
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 20:48
by Thea
Andrew S wrote:Big Si wrote:
Poor Colin Baker never stood a chance. I agree I thought Sly was very good, but No. 1 Doc of all time has to be -
Yes, he's a predictable choice for favourite Doctor but he is mine too. His autobiography is well worth a read. Made me laugh out loud on the train many times.
I love "Who on earth is..." too.
And the boy who kicked pigs
i met him at a book signing for his autobiography. I was about 14 and just remember how upsettingly tall he was
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 20:57
by lazarus corporation
I spotted Tom Baker in Brighton just before Christmas - think he must live around here
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 21:58
by Andy TG
d00mw0lf wrote:Andrew S wrote:Big Si wrote:
Poor Colin Baker never stood a chance. I agree I thought Sly was very good, but No. 1 Doc of all time has to be -
Yes, he's a predictable choice for favourite Doctor but he is mine too. His autobiography is well worth a read. Made me laugh out loud on the train many times.
I love "Who on earth is..." too.
And the boy who kicked pigs
i met him at a book signing for his autobiography. I was about 14 and just remember how upsettingly tall he was
Oddly enough I am the same height at (Sir) Tom Baker 6'4"
- Then again Douglas Adams was also 6'4". And Douglas Adams wrote "Shada"!
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 22:03
by Thea
John Cleese too...
I seem to remember a quote about Graham Chapman being 6'3, and therefore 10% less funny than Cleese and Adams.
Still think it was a shame about Shada - it's a classic, even in it's incomplete state.
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 22:15
by smiscandlon
d00mw0lf wrote:John Cleese too...
I seem to remember a quote about Graham Chapman being 6'3, and therefore 10% less funny than Cleese and Adams.
Still think it was a shame about Shada - it's a classic, even in it's incomplete state.
What did you reckon to the "re-made" webcast version with Paul McGann?
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 22:28
by Thea
smiscandlon wrote:d00mw0lf wrote:John Cleese too...
I seem to remember a quote about Graham Chapman being 6'3, and therefore 10% less funny than Cleese and Adams.
Still think it was a shame about Shada - it's a classic, even in it's incomplete state.
What did you reckon to the "re-made" webcast version with Paul McGann?
Not seen it - wouldn't want to. it's not how it should have been.
Posted: 31 Mar 2005, 00:59
by Dan
Posted: 31 Mar 2005, 01:06
by Thea
Now that just ain't right.
Posted: 31 Mar 2005, 01:24
by Quiff Boy
as i've mentioned elsewhere, if were being cynical (:!:) i would say it was a deliberate ploy by the beeb to get a big, credible
name celeb in for the series launch, then replace him with "Casanova star David Tennant" once its got its initial hype out of the way...
Posted: 31 Mar 2005, 08:36
by Black Dahlia
Quiff Boy wrote:as i've mentioned elsewhere, if were being cynical (:!:) i would say it was a deliberate ploy by the beeb to get a big, credible
name celeb in for the series launch, then replace him with "Casanova star David Tennant" once its got its initial hype out of the way...
I fear QB may be right , I was reading the paper over someones shoulder this morning on the train and noticed a headline saying Ecclestone has said he wont do another series after this one. Gutted.
It better not be that twit from Casanova
Posted: 31 Mar 2005, 08:57
by Debaser
EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE
Posted: 31 Mar 2005, 13:44
by ruffers
"What's that? You'll double my money? And give me image rights? Ah, go on then, I'll do another series...."
Posted: 31 Mar 2005, 13:56
by Francis
I expect he struggled with the nuances of the character and the intricacies of the sub-text and wants to do something less demanding like Lear.
Posted: 09 Apr 2005, 17:39
by Dan
Andy TG wrote:Speaking of Guides - I am SOOOOOOO looking forward to The Hitch Hikers Movie.
You'd better transfer that looking-forward-to feeling for the radio series of book 4 and 5, to be broadcast later in the year (series 3 is out on cd if you missed it).
Unfortunately the film sounds like it's gonna be really bad.
It's s**t, really s**t, you just won't believe how mindbogglingly s**t it is...
Posted: 09 Apr 2005, 20:08
by Andy TG
Dan wrote:Andy TG wrote:Speaking of Guides - I am SOOOOOOO looking forward to The Hitch Hikers Movie.
You'd better transfer that looking-forward-to feeling for the radio series of book 4 and 5, to be broadcast later in the year (series 3 is out on cd if you missed it).
Unfortunately the film sounds like it's gonna be really bad.
It's s**t, really s**t, you just won't believe how mindbogglingly s**t it is...
I am also looking forward to listening and then buying the radio series of books 4 and 5. The 4th book is for sale on Play.com - release date 25/05/05.
Does anyone know the transmission dates for book 4? - I cant find them anywhere.
As for the movie, having seen many of the trailers and tv spots I am sure it will be great. Remember Douglas Adams did write the first draft of the Movie screenplay so it cant be THAT Bad!
Posted: 09 Apr 2005, 20:33
by Erudite
Tonight's episode was the best so far.
I suppose the point always to keep in mind is that it always was and always will be a children's television programme.
Reckon they will have done a pretty fine job of resurrecting the series by episode 13.
Posted: 09 Apr 2005, 20:53
by Dan
Andy TG wrote:Does anyone know the transmission dates for book 4? - I cant find them anywhere.
All I know is that it's 4 episodes for book 4 and another 4 for book 5. The original plans were to broadcast all 8 consecutively over 8 weeks but dates had to be put back when D*sney stook their oar in and delayed the broadcast of series 3.
The
bbc site says that something Hitchhikers will be starting on 3rd May, but as nothing has been announced so far it's probably a repeat as a teaser for series 4 and 5 starting later in the year.
Andy TG wrote:As for the movie, having seen many of the trailers and tv spots I am sure it will be great. Remember Douglas Adams did write the first draft of the Movie screenplay so it cant be THAT Bad!
Yes, it can be that bad. If you read the review on the page I linked (the long version of the review has spoilers but the short version doesn't) it basically explains how most of the classic lines have been deleted or rewritten, and how major parts of the plot have been edited/changed in order to make a total nonsense out of the plot. It sounds horrible. I won't be going to see it.
Erm, going back on topic of this thread, I enjoyed episode 3 of Dr Who, in fact I've enjoyed all 3 so far.
Posted: 09 Apr 2005, 20:53
by Zuma
Agreed, fine job all round!
Posted: 10 Apr 2005, 00:46
by Mrs. Snowey
Seems ok so far
Never mind that "Friday feeling", to paraphrase Mark Gatiss, I've got the Saturday tea-time feeling all over again
The only mis-giving I've got really is that the storylines are a little bit too, well, short. There seems to be throwaway lines that could mean everything or nothing. Maybe they'll build on them later in the series?
That Dr. Who Confidential thingie on Beeb 3 is quite entertaining too
Posted: 11 Apr 2005, 17:32
by Dan
Dan wrote:The
bbc site says that something Hitchhikers will be starting on 3rd May, but as nothing has been announced so far it's probably a repeat as a teaser for series 4 and 5 starting later in the year.
And since I posted that the page has been updated, and it is indeed series 4 that starts on 3rd may!