Heartland

Mrs RicheyJames wrote:I wouldn't. Bloody chav.

Yeah, but that's nothing a bit of chloroform wouldn't put right.

boudicca wrote:And are you intending to emigrate to a land where ethics are a prerequisite for gaining citizenship, or no?

Yes. And sanity.

FFS Dave wrote:Yeah, but that's nothing a bit of chloroform wouldn't put right.

Is there any situation you DON'T try and solve with drugs?

timsinister wrote:

boudicca wrote:And are you intending to emigrate to a land where ethics are a prerequisite for gaining citizenship, or no?

Yes. And sanity.

FFS Dave wrote:Yeah, but that's nothing a bit of chloroform wouldn't put right.

Is there any situation you DON'T try and solve with drugs?

Cutting the hedge. Drugs and chainsaws don't mix.

Unless you're going to see the Jim Rose Circus Sideshow. Then, they definitely do - especially at the point when they turn off all the lights, put on nightvision goggles and run through the audience juggling chainsaws. Wooo, good trips available there.

Hom_Corleone wrote:

IS THIS COOL?

Blonde and wearing orange....It's blummin sub zero, that's what it is!!!!!

Actually, it looks like he should've left the bleach on a tad longer....

MrChris wrote:Unless you're going to see the Jim Rose Circus Sideshow. Then, they definitely do - especially at the point when they turn off all the lights, put on nightvision goggles and run through the audience juggling chainsaws. Wooo, good trips available there.

I've been there too, it ruled Especially when they started throwing warm water around to simulate blood

Ethics and morality are completely variable dending on the people in question.

Whereas in most situations, I haven't got a problem (be it with trouser removal, etc, as d00my wants with a certain bald man), I have a huge ethical and moral problem with members of Girls Aloud being allowed human contact, and think they should be banned from spawning more of their sort.

Dark wrote:Ethics and morality are completely variable dending on the people in question.

Whereas in most situations, I haven't got a problem (be it with trouser removal, etc, as d00my wants with a certain bald man), I have a huge ethical and moral problem with members of Girls Aloud being allowed human contact, and think they should be banned from spawning more of their sort.

Well said, young man!

But it is me, not the D00mster, who is keen on the Von-trouser removal. She's busy with Rev. Hammer...

boudicca wrote:

Dark wrote:Ethics and morality are completely variable dending on the people in question.

Whereas in most situations, I haven't got a problem (be it with trouser removal, etc, as d00my wants with a certain bald man), I have a huge ethical and moral problem with members of Girls Aloud being allowed human contact, and think they should be banned from spawning more of their sort.

Well said, young man!

But it is me, not the D00mster, who is keen on the Von-trouser removal. She's busy with Rev. Hammer...

Hey - the trouser removal was markFiend's idea!
and leave Rev alone!

d00mw0lf wrote:Hey - the trouser removal was markFiend's idea!

I was just trying to get you out of an incriminating situation D00meh, where you could be accused of fancying an 'orrible old fella with knobbly knees and a string vest!

boudicca wrote:

d00mw0lf wrote:Hey - the trouser removal was markFiend's idea!

I was just trying to get you out of an incriminating situation D00meh, where you could be accused of fancying an 'orrible old fella with knobbly knees and a string vest!

Heaven forbid!
Rev Hammer doesn't wear a string vest...

DerekR wrote:

Norman Hunter wrote:Here's another - Big Brother's Orlaith McAllister. Check out the latest copy of Zoo.

Horrible, plastic-titted skinny bint with feet bigger than mine? I'd rather not.

Her tits are ridiculous