Page 3 of 8
Posted: 20 Apr 2006, 17:04
by James Blast
where's RoboBreezer
Boss?
Posted: 20 Apr 2006, 20:26
by Quiff Boy
we were right in front of ben. the only time i could see chris was during the last song when he wandered over to our side of the stage
the last couple i took - of him are though
clicky and
clicky
Posted: 20 Apr 2006, 20:50
by lachert
quiff boy, very artistic pictures sometimes
Posted: 20 Apr 2006, 21:58
by James Blast
Quiff Boy wrote:we were right in front of ben. the only time i could see chris was during the last song when he wandered over to our side of the stage
Ewwww gorgeous!
he favours one of those Ibanez planks I have, bass version with cream piping, obviously
Posted: 23 Apr 2006, 14:46
by Obviousman
Posted: 23 Apr 2006, 14:49
by doctoravalanche
Posted: 26 Apr 2006, 11:05
by Quiff Boy
lachert wrote:quiff boy, very artistic pictures sometimes
aye, sometimes
i'm not a particularly good photographer so i always work on the scattergun principle, which is that if you take 47 photos of each thing you really want a picture of, at least 2 of them will turn out
and the "motion blur" was more by accident, and my shaky hands, than by design
this is my fave:
eldo in hell
Posted: 26 Apr 2006, 12:28
by markfiend
Quiff Boy wrote:i'm not a particularly good photographer so i always work on the scattergun principle, which is that if you take 47 photos of each thing you really want a picture of, at least 2 of them will turn out
A professional photographer of my acquaintance told me years ago that most pros work that way too
Back when it was film, rather than digital, he said most pros think themselves lucky if they get one usable photo per roll of film.
Posted: 26 Apr 2006, 13:58
by Quiff Boy
markfiend wrote:Quiff Boy wrote:i'm not a particularly good photographer so i always work on the scattergun principle, which is that if you take 47 photos of each thing you really want a picture of, at least 2 of them will turn out
A professional photographer of my acquaintance told me years ago that most pros work that way too
Back when it was film, rather than digital, he said most pros think themselves lucky if they get one usable photo per roll of film.
cool
in total i took something 230 photos form that gig. some are unusable, others are almost exact duplicates of the one's i've posted
now if i could just stop by hands shaking while i'm snapping away
Posted: 26 Apr 2006, 14:08
by Obviousman
Monopod, I tell you
Posted: 26 Apr 2006, 16:17
by markfiend
Tuck your elbows into the sides of your body for a bit of support if you can. Obviously with most digital cameras you can't change the shutter speed, but if you're using a "proper" camera try to use as fast a shutter speed as possible to avoid camera-shake.
Posted: 26 Apr 2006, 17:55
by Obviousman
I'll try to do that then
Any explanation how I got the effect on my avatar
(sharp on the left, blurry on the right)
Posted: 26 Apr 2006, 18:19
by James Blast
Way back when I took photos at gigs, I used Kodak Tungsten 35mm transparency film, I'd get it 'push processed' at a lab. 'Push processing' means developing the film for longer allowing you to use a faster shutter speed. The tungsten element illiminated the harsh yellows and ambers you get from electric as opposed to natural light.
@
Z the right side of your pic is moving faster than the left, hence the motion blur
hope that helps folks
Posted: 26 Apr 2006, 19:47
by tristren
@Wrecker: Nice pics, thanks.
@Obviousman: Ben is moving his guitar.
Sisters-Pics-Online
Posted: 28 Apr 2006, 09:58
by sisters-pics
Pics from this concerts on my homepage online now:
23.04.2006 Berlin
21.04.2006 Bielefeld
19.04.2006 Kopenhagen
18.04.2006 Göteborg
17.04.2006 Malmö
16.04.2006 Hamburg
14.04.2006 Paris
www.sisters-pics.de
Posted: 28 Apr 2006, 19:28
by doc P
another shade of
empty ?
Posted: 29 Apr 2006, 12:09
by Obviousman
Posted: 29 Apr 2006, 12:36
by Badlander
Very nice pics indeed.
Posted: 29 Apr 2006, 16:26
by robertzombie
top job
Posted: 01 May 2006, 20:28
by DGP00666
Did anyone mention the pics that Mr. Christo has as a link at his Myspace website? Just in case...
http://simbolism.com/sisterstars/index.html
By the way, what's wrong with this picture?
Posted: 01 May 2006, 21:37
by Badlander
Posted: 01 May 2006, 21:55
by James Blast
caption competition time,
go on, you know you want to
Posted: 01 May 2006, 23:26
by Badlander
James Blast wrote:caption competition time,
go on, you know you want to
Great idea. It deserves its own thread.
Posted: 01 May 2006, 23:37
by James Blast
I would
Baddy, but all my threads wither and die after about 4 posts
FACT!