Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 12:52
this seems to be the opportunity to finally own a DD 7" 
Page 30 of 41
Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 15:03
i don´t have enough words in this language for that...
Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 15:06
I'll take 8. They're in much better condition than mine.
Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 17:20
just hope there will be a difference to recognize...
if not, than far well DD...
if not, than far well DD...
Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 21:06
ROGI and paper quality will not be the same.17.auflage wrote:just hope there will be a difference to recognize...
if not, than far well DD...
I wil buy them to check it out
Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 21:08
fine!
Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 21:17
Will let you know17.auflage wrote:fine!
Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 21:17
Of coursepaul wrote:ah well, I guess some Germans do want them anyways
Bought myself a copy and will check out the ROGI, paper quality, etc. once I receive the items and then post the results here.
Hopefully, the reissues will be easy to recognise
Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 21:18
great... hope to hear from you soon
Posted: 05 Nov 2009, 21:24
Don't worry Vic, it's not remakeble in my opinion. This quality seems 'too perfect'...Victim of Circumstance wrote:Of coursepaul wrote:ah well, I guess some Germans do want them anyways
Bought myself a copy and will check out the ROGI, paper quality, etc. once I receive the items and then post the results here.
Hopefully, the reissues will be easy to recognise
Seller is cashing quickly, already sold 5 DD's, 4 BE's, 2 Alices and 5 times the whole quantity.
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 06:37
... and how about this one from the same seller:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/THE-SISTERS-OF-ME ... 335731aafb
I don't think it's very nice to bootleg official releases...
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/THE-SISTERS-OF-ME ... 335731aafb
I don't think it's very nice to bootleg official releases...
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 09:21
hmm, blue vinyl. things I like. The cover is ugly....
I am much more afraid of a perfect copy of the DD.
Hope that there is a big thing we can make a difference.
I am much more afraid of a perfect copy of the DD.
Hope that there is a big thing we can make a difference.
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 11:20
Be happy that you are sure your DD is the real thing.17.auflage wrote:hmm, blue vinyl. things I like. The cover is ugly....
I am much more afraid of a perfect copy of the DD.
Hope that there is a big thing we can make a difference.
It might be harder for future buyers.
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 14:30
He makes them himself... Isn't that illegal bootlegging official releases?paul wrote:... and how about this one from the same seller:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/THE-SISTERS-OF-ME ... 335731aafb
I don't think it's very nice to bootleg official releases...
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 14:53
Report it to ebay. I am.cardoman wrote:He makes them himself... Isn't that illegal bootlegging official releases?paul wrote:... and how about this one from the same seller:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/THE-SISTERS-OF-ME ... 335731aafb
I don't think it's very nice to bootleg official releases...
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 15:18
I second that (except in situations where the official release is impossible to get).paul wrote:I don't think it's very nice to bootleg official releases...
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 15:24
Such as?despair wrote:I second that (except in situations where the official release is impossible to get).paul wrote:I don't think it's very nice to bootleg official releases...
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 16:47
I was speaking in general terms (not strictly Sisters).cardoman wrote:Such as?despair wrote:I second that (except in situations where the official release is impossible to get).paul wrote:I don't think it's very nice to bootleg official releases...
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 17:05
I respect this guy a lot more than the people who slap a photo copy cover on a CDr and call it rare.
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 17:44
That´s right!Rise891 wrote:I respect this guy a lot more than the people who slap a photo copy cover on a CDr and call it rare.
also i think it is not a good idea to copy official things....
But as said before. it looks good....
And no problems with the different colors of the BE and Alice and the 12" ...
But the DD is to much....couse if we have bad luck you can´t spot the difference...
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 19:40
Here he is again ...
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... 0506480119
operation_goodguys ...
: : ...
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... 0506480119
operation_goodguys ...
: : ...Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 20:50
Strictly speaking these are counterfeit not bootlegs - though this is a moot point depending on whether you are the artist, a record co, or a collector.despair wrote:I was speaking in general terms (not strictly Sisters).cardoman wrote:Such as?despair wrote: I second that (except in situations where the official release is impossible to get).
Agree that these look almost too perfect; I'll be intrigued to see the DD.
However good a copy I'm sure there'll be a way of telling the original and counterfeit apart. Even if you copy the run out groove information exactly, you'd still have to replicate George Peckhams handwriting which would not be easy.
Speaking of Mr Peckham - given his contribution to the Sisters legend you might want to check out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpidqcG7sSo
Flagg
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 22:33
A nice story, Flagg! So this is the man of the ROGI on the DD?Randall Flagg wrote:Strictly speaking these are counterfeit not bootlegs - though this is a moot point depending on whether you are the artist, a record co, or a collector.despair wrote:I was speaking in general terms (not strictly Sisters).cardoman wrote: Such as?
Agree that these look almost too perfect; I'll be intrigued to see the DD.
However good a copy I'm sure there'll be a way of telling the original and counterfeit apart. Even if you copy the run out groove information exactly, you'd still have to replicate George Peckhams handwriting which would not be easy.
Speaking of Mr Peckham - given his contribution to the Sisters legend you might want to check out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpidqcG7sSo
Flagg
PS: on the japanese counterfeit there was no handscript but lettering.
Posted: 06 Nov 2009, 23:46
He certainly is!cardoman wrote:A nice story, Flagg! So this is the man of the ROGI on the DD?Randall Flagg wrote:Strictly speaking these are counterfeit not bootlegs - though this is a moot point depending on whether you are the artist, a record co, or a collector.despair wrote: I was speaking in general terms (not strictly Sisters).
Agree that these look almost too perfect; I'll be intrigued to see the DD.
However good a copy I'm sure there'll be a way of telling the original and counterfeit apart. Even if you copy the run out groove information exactly, you'd still have to replicate George Peckhams handwriting which would not be easy.
Speaking of Mr Peckham - given his contribution to the Sisters legend you might want to check out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpidqcG7sSo
Flagg
PS: on the japanese counterfeit there was no handscript but lettering.
Prolific during the 70"s and 80"s with numerous classic punk and new wave releases. Prior to that he worked with Led Zep and started out with the Beatles.
It would be fascinating to know what he made of DD when he heard the master!
Ref the Japanese DD, yes I'm aware of that. There are also some very good copies of early Joy Division singles that reproduce the labels perfectly but have not replicated the ROGI either.
Flagg
Posted: 07 Nov 2009, 01:08
it was so good he, porky, had to get pissed before he could approach it