The Sisters of Mercy Forum
https://myheartland.co.uk/
We still refer to Ketchup as Southern Sauce and Brown Sauce as Northern Sauce.Swinnow wrote:We decided during our college days, back in prehistory, that the choice of HP or Ketchup was a dead good guide as to someone's origin.
A butty is usually two pieces of bread with a filling in the middleEmmaPeelWannaBe wrote:and when is a bun a butty? as a californian, my education is lacking in these matters.
and is a tea cake, not in fact cake?Swinnow wrote:
but a tea cake here in Leeds.
now that is just nuts. and like to end in cannibalism.Swinnow wrote:In England a butty is a sandwich but in Welsh Wales it means a friend.
That's a rabbit hole you don't want to go downEmmaPeelWannaBe wrote:and is a tea cake, not in fact cake?Swinnow wrote:
but a tea cake here in Leeds.
But critically the bread must be buttered, otherwise it's just a...bready.SmileySister wrote:A butty is usually two pieces of bread with a filling in the middleEmmaPeelWannaBe wrote:and when is a bun a butty? as a californian, my education is lacking in these matters.
5. Ginger Nuts - yes or no?EvilBastard wrote:Critical questions:
1. To Dunk or not To Dunk?
2. Mug or Cup?
3. Chocolate - is it the top or the bottom?
4. Can I have a fag?
1. NotEmmaPeelWannaBe wrote:5. Ginger Nuts - yes or no?EvilBastard wrote:Critical questions:
1. To Dunk or not To Dunk?
2. Mug or Cup?
3. Chocolate - is it the top or the bottom?
4. Can I have a fag?
SmileySister wrote:Inside knowledge, Smiley?EmmaPeelWannaBe wrote:5. NoEvilBastard wrote:Critical questions:
5. Ginger Nuts - yes or no?
EmmaPeelWannaBe wrote:Can I plead the 5th Amendment?SmileySister wrote:Inside knowledge, Smiley?EmmaPeelWannaBe wrote: 5. No
SmileySister wrote:Only if you're in the U.S.EmmaPeelWannaBe wrote:Can I plead the 5th Amendment?SmileySister wrote: Inside knowledge, Smiley?
Thank you. an interesting question amongst the detritus. I too wonder why the apathy set in, a spat with a record company seems a handy excuse for a complete lack of creative output from UTG onwards. Maybe he just can't be bothered, and if that's the case we are not talking about a real artist are we.An wrote:My question would be; what happened to him after Vision Thing? I mean after that his creativity, his musical energy or motivation seemed to have gone.
It´s interesting, because when you compare rockmusicians with, say, classiccomposers, you will see that the rockmusicians tend to peak musically and energywise in their twenties, although composers in their later lifes. Different mindscape? Sexual drives and narcissity? A more mathematical approach of the composers instead the more gutsy rockmusicians?
That would be my question.
Getting a bit off topic, but I find art and its purpose (both the creation and the consumption) fascinating. I'm not sure that Andrew, now or ever, fits the bill for an artist who has given up on creating art, but must that always mean that they aren't a true artist? Couldn't that be the end state of expression? The knowledge and acceptance that conveying something meaningful is not possible?zaltys7 wrote:Thank you. an interesting question amongst the detritus. I too wonder why the apathy set in, a spat with a record company seems a handy excuse for a complete lack of creative output from UTG onwards. Maybe he just can't be bothered, and if that's the case we are not talking about a real artist are we.An wrote:My question would be; what happened to him after Vision Thing? (etc).
sultan2075 wrote:
a) What makes you think you understand Hegel?
Has he actually stated that he does? If he has then maybe the master-slave dialectic might reflect his woes with the music industry and some musicians
b) What do you make Georg to actually mean? c) Shall we open another bottle?
Taking these together would he even give the time of day to Georg given that he can apparently be "out consumed by Hume"?
totally understand where you come from. BUT at the same time an artist must surely create? I see no creation, or at least I see no will to create meaningfully. I hear a bunch of half arsed songs on dodgy bootlegs. Okay, so he no longer has anything relevant to say, in which case, stop pretending you have, and shut the f**k up.Chaotican wrote:Getting a bit off topic, but I find art and its purpose (both the creation and the consumption) fascinating. I'm not sure that Andrew, now or ever, fits the bill for an artist who has given up on creating art, but must that always mean that they aren't a true artist? Couldn't that be the end state of expression? The knowledge and acceptance that conveying something meaningful is not possible?zaltys7 wrote:Thank you. an interesting question amongst the detritus. I too wonder why the apathy set in, a spat with a record company seems a handy excuse for a complete lack of creative output from UTG onwards. Maybe he just can't be bothered, and if that's the case we are not talking about a real artist are we.An wrote:My question would be; what happened to him after Vision Thing? (etc).
IAt any rate, most humans would answer nuanced questions like this differently depending on mood and circumstance. It's impossible to get "truth" in a static answer (or an interview for that matter) but you can learn various things in a conversation.
