Page 4 of 4
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 09:31
by randdebiel²
_emma_ wrote:randdebiel² wrote:We wont laugh because I think we all agree.
Oooof. Finally! You've opened your eyes and started to understand.
Thank you.
it's nothing new...if I want sex I only have to put floodland on
(or front 242' re-boot, but that's slightly off-topic....)
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 09:38
by Francis
randdebiel² wrote:how do you manage at all?
We manage. We just don't like to talk about it.
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 09:39
by Francis
_emma_ wrote:he does sing about sex all the time, no matter if it's Jesus or Pee Wee Herman or cold war on the surface, in fact it's always pure sex underneath.
Just like a Carry On film really.
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 09:52
by markfiend
Carry On Moping?
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 11:22
by Francis
randdebiel² wrote:the sisters are about sex
On second thoughts, there might be some truth in this. I only used to go to the Phono to leer at the sexy Goth Godesses. I just pretended to like the music and the cheep lager.
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 11:32
by randdebiel²
beginning to see the light?
(now guess how many posts I can make with velvet underground lyrics
, yes fairly, utterly bored by now....)
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 11:53
by Izzy HaveMercy
randdebiel² wrote:it's nothing new...if I want sex I only have to put floodland on
(or front 242' re-boot, but that's slightly off-topic....)
I tried that too, once.
Then I found out the holes are way too small.
Sorry, couldna resist....
IZ.
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 11:57
by randdebiel²
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:
I tried that too, once.
Then I found out the holes are way too small.
Sorry, couldna resist....
IZ.
so you're a brit then?
you actually had to try to holes were too small?
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:16
by lazarus corporation
A couple of years back I did a short freelance job for a slash porn site - writing and designing their press release to promote the site.
Needless to say, the first few hours were spent working out what the hell I was meant to be promoting, and what this slash porn thing was all about (I had to write a potted history of slash for the press release so magazine editors could cut and paste it for their readers).
The whole concept of slash seems fine (just like watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer and imagining what would happen if Willow came on to Buffy and it wasn't restricted by teatime TV guidelines ... erm ... that's just, like, a random example, yeah
).
The only disturbing thing was the amount of "non-con" slash that the female readers seemed to enjoy (based on the feedback pages) - "non-con" being non-consenual, and basically being descriptions of male/male rape.
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:18
by Izzy HaveMercy
randdebiel² wrote:Izzy HaveMercy wrote:
I tried that too, once.
Then I found out the holes are way too small.
Sorry, couldna resist....
IZ.
so you're a brit then?
you actually had to try to holes were too small?
I put mayonaise on my Belgian fries instead of ketchup on my chips.
And I drink beer with a 'stevig kolleke'.
Nuff said?
Btw, remember those 7' singles of yore where you needed an adaptor to play them on yer turntable? That's the reason. I fitted in there. It was very fitting, but I managed
IZ.
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:21
by emilystrange
lazarus corporation wrote:A couple of years back I did a short freelance job for a slash porn site - writing and designing their press release to promote the site.
Needless to say, the first few hours were spent working out what the hell I was meant to be promoting, and what this slash porn thing was all about (I had to write a potted history of slash for the press release so magazine editors could cut and paste it for their readers).
The whole concept of slash seems fine (just like watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer and imagining what would happen if Willow came on to Buffy and it wasn't restricted by teatime TV guidelines ... erm ... that's just, like, a random example, yeah
).
The only disturbing thing was the amount of "non-con" slash that the female readers seemed to enjoy (based on the feedback pages) - "non-con" being non-consenual, and basically being descriptions of male/male rape.
no, there def has to be 'con', whether in straight or slash..
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:23
by randdebiel²
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:
I put mayonaise on my Belgian fries instead of ketchup on my chips.
And I drink beer with a 'stevig kolleke'.
Nuff said?
Btw, remember those 7' singles of yore where you needed an adaptor to play them on yer turntable? That's the reason. I fitted in there. It was very fitting, but I managed
IZ.
colleke is with a "c" :p
as for the rest...
I suppose it's too late to get me coat?
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:25
by Izzy HaveMercy
randdebiel² wrote:Izzy HaveMercy wrote:
I put mayonaise on my Belgian fries instead of ketchup on my chips.
And I drink beer with a 'stevig kolleke'.
Nuff said?
Btw, remember those 7' singles of yore where you needed an adaptor to play them on yer turntable? That's the reason. I fitted in there. It was very fitting, but I managed
IZ.
colleke is with a "c" :p
as for the rest...
I suppose it's too late to get me coat?
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to late
BTW, I'm from Flanders Fields, so it is 'Kolleke' with a 'K'.
IZ.
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:26
by randdebiel²
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to late
BTW, I'm from Flanders Fields, so it is 'Kolleke' with a 'K'.
IZ.
Waregem?
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:30
by lazarus corporation
emilystrange wrote:
no, there def has to be 'con', whether in straight or slash..
Unfortunately if you do a search on Google for "slash NCS" (NCS being the other acronymn used for non-consensual sex in the slash/yaoi community) then you'll find an awful lot of stuff out there.
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:32
by randdebiel²
yeah but thtat's not really specific for slash is it....
go to any stories site nowadays and there are more rape stories than anything else :puke:
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:34
by lazarus corporation
randdebiel² wrote:yeah but thtat's not really specific for slash is it....
go to any stories site nowadays and there are more rape stories than anything else :puke:
true enough, unfortunately
but it does seem more common on slash sites (at least the ones I researched when I did that press release)
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 12:51
by Francis
lazarus corporation wrote:The only disturbing thing was the amount of "non-con" slash that the female readers seemed to enjoy (based on the feedback pages) - "non-con" being non-consenual, and basically being descriptions of male/male rape.
That would make them Scumbags then.
Posted: 19 Aug 2004, 18:01
by rian
I can imagine, after 15 years with the same partner, some new "toys" could get the sexlife going. Porn movies can be one toy. Both for women and men.
But there are many other toys out there