Posted: 03 Jun 2005, 12:44
Irrefutable arguments, yes...
The company of a good woman, no.
The price I must pay, it seems.
The company of a good woman, no.
The price I must pay, it seems.
The Sisters of Mercy Forum
https://myheartland.co.uk/
I think it also depends on that OTHER person and their commitment to the whole thing. Also, it is so bloody easy to invent a whole new you over the Net and pretend that you are somebody completely different. For me it worked in a different way - I met somebody face to face first and the Net is really helping us to stay in touch. He lives in a different country, so it is very long-distance thing, also he is in the kind of industry I told myself I would never get involved with again. But I hope I will be able to say one day that lond-distance relatonships really do work!Dark wrote:
Guess it works for some people.
good luck DDelilah wrote:But I hope I will be able to say one day that lond-distance relatonships really do work!
My hopes are UP!!! And I had a month to think about itBrideoffrankenstein wrote:good luck DDelilah wrote:But I hope I will be able to say one day that lond-distance relatonships really do work!
I hope this one works out for you
Had 3 long distance relations, non of them worked out.Delilah wrote:OK, we have "love and relationships" topic, now another question - what do you think about long-distance relationships? Do they work or is it a waste of time?
I wish you all the best, Delilah!Delilah wrote:My hopes are UP!!! And I had a month to think about itBrideoffrankenstein wrote:good luck DDelilah wrote:But I hope I will be able to say one day that lond-distance relatonships really do work!
I hope this one works out for you
So - time to board the "train of flesh" I think!
In a word... no.andymackem wrote:How long does a distance have to be to qualify?
Would living within 70 miles, but working largely incompatible timetables, count as long-distance simply because it's hard to see one another?
I'll see what I can bring back from Russia, now I know the rules of the game.boudicca wrote:In a word... no.andymackem wrote:How long does a distance have to be to qualify?
Would living within 70 miles, but working largely incompatible timetables, count as long-distance simply because it's hard to see one another?
You have to have different weather.
Preferably different time zones.
You really are cruisin' for a bruisin' at the moment, Andrew...andymackem wrote: Glad to hear it's sunny in Estonia, anyway. I'll see what I can bring back from Russia, now I know the rules of the game.
Is it illegal to actually meet the person in question at any point?
Always knew you were like that...andymackem wrote:Brandishes a handbag.
If Headingley-Beeston counts as long-distance, then no (that's a whole 6 miles).Delilah wrote:OK, we have "love and relationships" topic, now another question - what do you think about long-distance relationships? Do they work or is it a waste of time?
I've mellowed over the years....andymackem wrote:Was happy enough with my current name, to be honest.
But as Queen of the Iceni, aren't you the spiritual leader of Essex Girls? Or was attacking Southend a bit harder than burning down Colchester
you wanna bet?straylight wrote:we tend to regret what we didn't do more than what we did.
THE voice of reason._emma_ wrote:As for long-distance relationships, I reckon they're much better than short-distance relationships. But Internet relationships are even better.
Before some of you say I'm stupid, please consider that the starting point of this conclusion is the assumption that the vast majority of relationships are based on deceit (because if they weren't, they wouldn't exist at all), and it's so much more comfortable to deceive and to be deceived when there's some room in between us.
OK, there's always exceptions....Quiff Boy wrote:you wanna bet?straylight wrote:we tend to regret what we didn't do more than what we did.