Page 31 of 41
Posted: 07 Nov 2009, 13:45
by Randall Flagg
paint it black wrote:it was so good he, porky, had to get pissed before he could approach it
Probably best way to master it was to replicate state of mind at the time of the recording!
Interesting that as Bilbo (Dennis Blackham)at Tape One mastered Body Electric, Porky must have got one hell of a shock when he first heard Alice/Floorshow prior to mastering it!
Flagg
Posted: 14 Nov 2009, 11:17
by cardoman
Victim of Circumstance wrote:paul wrote:ah well, I guess some Germans do want them anyways
Of course
Bought myself a copy and will check out the ROGI, paper quality, etc. once I receive the items and then post the results here.
Hopefully, the reissues will be easy to recognise
Already received?
Posted: 14 Nov 2009, 16:08
by Victim of Circumstance
Not yet, waiting ...
Posted: 14 Nov 2009, 18:07
by cardoman
Victim of Circumstance wrote:Not yet, waiting ...
exciting...
Posted: 14 Nov 2009, 21:38
by Quiff Boy
a mate of mine bought the
alice white vinyl/white sleeve repro 7" today - £6 from a market stall in huddersfield
i've seen it and it looks great. the sleeve is on very good quality card, although the artwork on the clearly back says "2009" under the MR head/star logo.
the labels look pretty authentic too.
he's not heard it yet though so have no idea what the quality of audio pressing is like.
i gather the DD is the same - good quality card with "2009" clearly visible
i don't think it's set out to fool anyone into thinking they are originals... but then, i don't really know what they
are for either
Posted: 14 Nov 2009, 22:28
by cardoman
Quiff Boy wrote:
a mate of mine bought the
alice white vinyl/white sleeve repro 7" today - £6 from a market stall in huddersfield
i've seen it and it looks great. the sleeve is on very good quality card, although the artwork on the clearly back says "2009" under the MR head/star logo.
the labels look pretty authentic too.
he's not heard it yet though so have no idea what the quality of audio pressing is like.
i gather the DD is the same - good quality card with "2009" clearly visible
i don't think it's set out to fool anyone into thinking they are originals... but then, i don't really know what they
are for either
Tx for info boss... I do like the artwork of all them
Posted: 15 Nov 2009, 00:26
by Victim of Circumstance
Yes, the artwork seem to be good quality card with glossy sleeves, although I haven't received my copy, see the link below:
Clicky
So the reissues should be easily to recognise
Posted: 15 Nov 2009, 01:59
by Being645
Comments: Nice Repress in glossy sleeve
Fair enough ... and the price is surely no crime ...
...
Posted: 15 Nov 2009, 08:33
by cardoman
Being645 wrote:Comments: Nice Repress in glossy sleeve
Fair enough ... and the price is surely no crime ...
...
Nicer than the japanese repress, glossy sleeve...
Posted: 15 Nov 2009, 11:23
by paul
Only time will tell if this new glossy is gonna be a "legend" like the Jap.
Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 09:33
by radiojamaica
Victim of Circumstance wrote:Yes, the artwork seem to be good quality card with glossy sleeves, although I haven't received my copy, see the link below:
Clicky
So the reissues should be easily to recognise
Yes, they are! I received my copy of the Damage Done reissue and I must say it is very well done. I'm glad to finally own a copy after nearly 20 years of searching... okay, it ain't the real thing, but it comes close enough (for now
).
Glossy sleeve indeed, cross on top of church & all and 2009 printed on the back. Also nice to see Home of the Hitmen is there in all of its glory. Rogi are different too, so if somebody is able to take this for an original one then they deserve to overpay it massively
Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 11:03
by Quiff Boy
whats the sounds quality like? i'm assuming they've all been taken from the SGWBM cd audio?
Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 11:56
by radiojamaica
I guess so... sound is okay!
Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 12:29
by cardoman
radiojamaica wrote:Victim of Circumstance wrote:Yes, the artwork seem to be good quality card with glossy sleeves, although I haven't received my copy, see the link below:
Clicky
So the reissues should be easily to recognise
Yes, they are! I received my copy of the Damage Done reissue and I must say it is very well done. I'm glad to finally own a copy after nearly 20 years of searching... okay, it ain't the real thing, but it comes close enough (for now
).
Glossy sleeve indeed, cross on top of church & all and 2009 printed on the back. Also nice to see Home of the Hitmen is there in all of its glory. Rogi are different too, so if somebody is able to take this for an original
one then they deserve to overpay it massively
Nice to hear! Proud owner.
Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 19:36
by radiojamaica
cardoman wrote:
Nice to hear! Proud owner.
Very much so
Oh yeah, Rogi-wise there's MR7 A and MR7 B to be found...
Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 20:00
by Rise891
I got all four yesterday also and I am very pleased. Seems to be the same people who did the FALAA represses a few years back.
Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 20:25
by 17.auflage
yes, propper job and fair differences....nothing to say against it.
and
and
and
Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 22:16
by abridged
Still can't imagine
will be chuffed. These are different from 'live' bootlegs or even demos. The 2009 on the back dosen't change the fact that they're ripping off actual Sisters products, i.e. songs. I can understand that they look good in a collection but still...
Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 23:18
by Being645
Perhaps, he receives part of the revenues ...
... in that case, I'd even buy one ...
Posted: 18 Nov 2009, 09:43
by paul
had a hand in certain bootlegs in the past, so maybe in these also.
Posted: 18 Nov 2009, 09:47
by Ozpat
paul wrote: had a hand in certain bootlegs in the past, so maybe in these also.
Which ones Paul?
Posted: 18 Nov 2009, 10:02
by paul
I once read about Knocking On Docks Door. Don't know if anyone can confirm this btw?
Posted: 18 Nov 2009, 20:50
by Randall Flagg
paul wrote:I once read about Knocking On Docks Door. Don't know if anyone can confirm this btw?
That one seems unlikely, though it is an interesting thought.
While in the main the presentation looks authentic, I'd suggest that is more to do with copying the official tour program than anything else.
The mixture of fonts is something I'd imagine
would not stand for even if he were releasing a bootleg as opposed to an official release.
Flagg
Posted: 18 Nov 2009, 21:02
by Rise891
He has told me several times he hates every bootleg ever made. He tried to compete by making live tracks available on a single and it didn't go well. He also has no desire to release the infamous live video they were shooting for 5 years.
Posted: 18 Nov 2009, 21:06
by paul
Rise891 wrote:He has told me several times ...
You guys live in the same building or wot?