Page 40 of 41
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 01:11
by 6FeetOver
Very cute, dear Maiseybabes - the lot o' ye!
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 01:34
by Planet Dave
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 16:11
by Obviousman
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 16:40
by radiojamaica
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 19:22
by robertzombie
bending the rules a bit...
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 20:14
by Zuma
psichonaut wrote:Zuma wrote:One I took last weekend in Valencia -
where do you was to make a pic like this?
I was lucky enough to blag a track pass!
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 20:29
by Obviousman
I'd wanted to take a picture of that for ages now, glad it came out so well to be honest
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 20:36
by Dr. Moody
some great pics there folks,
mebbe this thread just needs some pruning of idle chat etc, keep it alive a bit longer,
oh and if I say so myself best Dr. Moody thread evahhh
huge
to the lot o ya.
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 21:08
by markfiend
Dr. Moody wrote:this thread just needs some pruning of idle chat etc, keep it alive a bit longer,
Good idea.
Bagsy not me
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 21:10
by Obviousman
But then the page count would get rather fcuked up?
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 21:43
by Bartek
@Obviousman: last two are amazing,that i like the most nice, simple shot, simple situation.
postcard from wroclaw (university of wr.)
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 22:00
by Obviousman
Going through old posts and having (re)discovered the joys of proper film, I wondered:
Carpathian Psychonaut wrote:James Blast wrote:the only infrared I could get back then (late 70s early 80s) was Kodak's, and ye dae ken ye need a red filter tae get the full effect, especially on plants etc?
I need one, actually - a red filter with B&W film gives massive contrast and that's what I like. Yet another thing on the list!
Would using my red flash give anything of that effect?
And for infrared: I think I'd be lucky to find colour 120 film, so right now sticking to B&W because I have to, rather than by choice
Anyway, the roll that's coming up now is 400ISO (Ilford HP5+), wonder what that'll bring
And thanks Bartoszek
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 22:11
by mh
James Blast wrote:mh, it exists
From
Bartoszek on the previous page:
I find myself liking this one a lot.
As we're on page 40, have to say credit to
Dr Moody for starting the thread! It's been a total gem.
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 22:36
by Dark
Maybe we should stickify it, and just have one last reply #999. That way, it can never actually be binned for being over a thousand replies.
Posted: 13 Nov 2007, 22:47
by christophe
or lock it up and put it in an archive, like the 2005-2006 tour topics
I might not post pictures myself (yet) but I do like to see what you guys come up with
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 17:22
by Dr. Moody
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 18:01
by 6FeetOver
Veddy nice.
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 18:17
by James Blast
Paradise Skies, Glasgow '79
Ilford HP5, 1600 ASA, bromide print, grade 3
Canon A1, 18mm Canon lens
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 18:22
by Bartek
continuing the sky them:
"looking out the morning I can see the trees turn orange in the rays" a.eldritch
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 18:40
by Obviousman
Bloody good job. All three of you
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 21:42
by Carpathian Psychonaut
James Blast wrote:
Paradise Skies, Glasgow '79
Ilford HP5, 1600 ASA, bromide print, grade 3
Canon A1, 18mm Canon lens
That's a stunner, sir. Properly gorgeous composition that really throws out that typical sky/ground balance.
Mmmmmm, HP5 - you gotta love Ilford.....
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 21:44
by Carpathian Psychonaut
@ Z - you HAVE to post "Twisted Worlds" on here - it's amazing!
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 21:46
by Obviousman
I've been told
But I'll do that in the next thread, when this one comes to a close!
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 22:31
by Izzy HaveMercy
Feck it. Post it here AND in the next wan.
And that Paradise Skies beats every bloody postrock album artwank by a mile! It's gorgeous!
IZ.
Posted: 14 Nov 2007, 22:35
by James Blast
I thank you.
bin it - or Die!