Page 1 of 2

trade...

Posted: 07 Mar 2006, 12:07
by itnAklipse
i've got an excellent, almost perfect, recording of Leeds 2005, and as this supposedly is a bit rare, i'm offering it up for trade for any 2006 recordings, and any other good quality recordings that i don't have.

My list is at: http://www.geocities.com/cybele16/tsom/sisters.htm (the said Leeds recording isn't listed)

dei

PS: Naturally i'm willing to trade anything else for 2006 recordings, too.

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 15:34
by Booslham
Hey Man!!!

Post your Leeds 2005 gig here to share.
I just posted the Las Vegas 2006 gig on "Audio 2006". Go get it.

Please share.
Sharing is caring.

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 15:48
by itnAklipse
Not this one, i'm afraid. i'm all for sharing, but some people don't want their recordings to be given for public distribution (a sad fact of life) and i'm obviously obliged to keep my word about such things. Also, it would be impossible for me to obtain any hard to get stuff if i didn't have any rarities to negotiate with. (Referring to PIB's post in 2006 Audio thread)

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 16:09
by Badlander
You have a point. If we turned this forum into a mere trading platform, it would take away some of its "soul". Now I see you have a nice collection. Would you be interested in trading for non Sisters stuff ?

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 17:39
by davedecay
once you trade that 2005 show out, it's OUT. we will ALL have it. ;D

i used to trade years ago, and it sucked having to deal with "rare swaps only" and "don't trade this out." i'm so glad for bit torrent and rapidshare and FTP and Hotline and slsk and Acquisition... except you don't often make any friends like with real-person trading.

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 17:51
by zaltys7
The trading section is for Trading, not hassleing people who choose to do that instead of weeding or sharing or whatever the hell it is YOU want, so that YOU can get a freebie FFS :x

Paul

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 17:55
by markfiend
Well said Paul.

Some people smuggle recording equipment into gigs, often at some personal risk (at the very least you would get thrown out...)

Just expecting their recordings to be made freely available, just on some random stranger's say so on the Internet, isn't really reasonable.

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 19:46
by davedecay
i see your points. as i said, however, once a show is traded, you have to trust that the person you traded with will uphold the same level of control over the show. the more it's swapped out, the less that control becomes.

i'd hazard to guesss just about every show in weeding was taped surreptitiously, save perhaps a soundboard here or there. even those might have been secret patches, or tapes that were leaked or stolen.

unless a band gives full permission & endorsement of taping & trading, then most live recordings fall under "risk-taking" endeavors. i've done it in the past. most times they just take your tape, leaving you with the recorder. other times they take your equipment until after the show. and there are worse-case scenarios.

nothing wrong with trading or asking for something good in return for a recording, however, especially if you are looking to grow your collection quicker.

consider also those who ask that their recordings not be traded or distributed as MP3 - that's another wrinkle to the music scene.

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 23:20
by Badlander
The "sharing is caring" argument was discussed on Dominion very recently, right after that surprising flow of downloadable MP3s. I didn't follow the whole debate, but they did decide to stop sharing for nothing.

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 23:24
by lazarus corporation
I don't trade (because I can't be arsed)
I do weed (because I like the ethic)
I don't hold anything against traders who decide to keep things to themselves - fair enough.
I'm happy when people make things available for weeding.

Posted: 08 Mar 2006, 23:55
by James Blast
what Paul said

Posted: 09 Mar 2006, 06:28
by Silver_Owl
What Paul & James said.

Posted: 09 Mar 2006, 18:34
by Big Si
What Paul, James and Hom said.

Valentine? :innocent: :wink:

Posted: 09 Mar 2006, 18:41
by davedecay
Big Si wrote:What Paul, James and Hom said.
ditto, etc.

Posted: 10 Mar 2006, 01:11
by Silver_Owl
Big Si wrote:
Valentine? :innocent: :wink:
Indeed :innocent: :oops:

Posted: 10 Mar 2006, 20:54
by Big Si
Hom_Corleone wrote:
Big Si wrote:
Valentine? :innocent: :wink:
Indeed :innocent: :oops:
You sure? :wink:

Posted: 10 Mar 2006, 21:09
by James Blast
he's lyin'

Posted: 10 Mar 2006, 21:43
by Big Si
James Blast wrote:he's lyin'
He can't be....or is he? :wink:

Posted: 10 Mar 2006, 21:50
by James Blast
Mrs. Rutling Orange Peel - he's always lyin'
Rutling Orange Peel - I ain't lyin'
:roll:

Posted: 10 Mar 2006, 22:06
by EvilBastard
As it's Friday afternoon, and I'm just marking time before going down the pub, any ideas on what a FALAA album cover signed by all 4 members of the band fetches these days? Picked it up in Ubik in Hyde Park, Leeds, about 10 years ago, it's dedicated to some bird named Rose. I think I paid about 30 squids. The sleeve is in good nick, the disks are a bit dodgy though.

Posted: 10 Mar 2006, 22:18
by Big Si
EvilBastard wrote:As it's Friday afternoon, and I'm just marking time before going down the pub, any ideas on what a FALAA album cover signed by all 4 members of the band fetches these days? Picked it up in Ubik in Hyde Park, Leeds, about 10 years ago, it's dedicated to some bird named Rose. I think I paid about 30 squids. The sleeve is in good nick, the disks are a bit dodgy though.
Real or fake signatures? :?

Posted: 10 Mar 2006, 22:22
by James Blast
EvilBastard wrote:the disks are a bit dodgy though.
plural?
Mission and Revenge... we need to know

Posted: 10 Mar 2006, 22:27
by EvilBastard
James Blast wrote:
EvilBastard wrote:the disks are a bit dodgy though.
plural?
Mission and Revenge... we need to know
Oh christ, can't rememer at the mo - have to check at home - it's a gatefold sleeve with the Detroit's Finest Adult Movies pik in the middle. I think it's two disks.
Real or fake sigs? Not sure - they look real (different hands, different pens, :von:'s sig looks genuine (big point A, all squished up).

Posted: 11 Mar 2006, 00:16
by James Blast
Ah! just FAALA on two 12 inchers with the nice inner.

I'm sure Dan and the others will pick up on my error.

Posted: 11 Mar 2006, 00:54
by Silver_Owl
James Blast wrote:he's lyin'
Oh dear. I do seem to have wasted my time here. Still, it's nice here, isnt it, you know, down by the Mississippi...

Image :lol: