Heartland

Posted: **05 Nov 2006, 20:03**

Question:

If AE had been born a woman but had still exactly the same career ie songs, band, lifestyle etc would she be as popular as the male counterpart.

Personally, I probably would n't be such a big fan, maybe not at all.
Call me old fashioned but I like AE because he's a bloke.

Posted: **05 Nov 2006, 20:16**

His current hair-do would have caused even more criticism if he were a woman

All depends on what the voice would've sounded like really...

Posted: **05 Nov 2006, 22:15**

i guess the bandname would've been Brothers in Arms then.

NEXT.[/b]

Posted: **05 Nov 2006, 22:19**

Posted: **05 Nov 2006, 23:00**

you have far too much time on your hands G'sC, relax, please relax

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 15:06**

I would definitely be a lesbian then, that's 100% certain.
She would be very lonely, because men hate women who have both the good looks and the strong personality.
And we probably wouldn't have a chance to hear The Brothers In Arms version of Jolene.

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 15:12**

i think Andrea is one terrible name, though.

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 15:35**

James Blast wrote:you have far too much time on your hands G'sC, relax, please relax

Indeed.

Still, your posts make me laugh Gollum.

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 15:49**

If AE was born a woman, I guess she would be called 'Grace Jones' and would right about this time be called "Viscountess of Wimborne"

IZ.

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 18:19**

Izzy HaveMercy wrote:If AE was born a woman, I guess she would be called 'Grace Jones' and would right about this time be called "Viscountess of Wimborne"

IZ.

But then she would've been black at the same time? Now that's not very goth, is it

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 18:40**

_emma_ wrote: She would be very lonely, because men hate women who have both the good looks and the strong personality.

Wadayamin ?

And I will not say that "Kate Bush is a female Peter Gabriel" because I think that's very silly.

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 19:43**

her nips look awfy high up in that pic, not much of a handful by Blast's reckoning

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 20:36**

James Blast wrote:her nips look awfy high up in that pic, not much of a handful by Blast's reckoning

Better than a turned up nose.
The theoretical Andrea would probably be a brilliant version of Gianna Nanini (Leeds Edition)..?

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 20:53**

James Blast wrote:her nips look awfy high up in that pic, not much of a handful by Blast's reckoning

This is a photo from 1978, she was still just a kid then. Plus you must admit that you are very demanding.

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 21:00**

But what would the male equivalent of Kate Bush be called

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 21:04**

Gollum's Cock wrote:But what would the male equivalent of Kate Bush be called

Dead easy, Keith Muff!

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 21:23**

Keith Bin Laden, i presume.

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 21:34**

Gollum's Cock wrote:But what would the male equivalent of Kate Bush be called

Robert Smith was once called just that.
So if Kate is the male Peter Gabriel, and Robert Smith is the female Kate Bush, then Robert Smith surely must be Peter Gabriel.

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 22:55**

James Blast wrote:
Gollum's Cock wrote:But what would the male equivalent of Kate Bush be called
Dead easy, Keith Muff!

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 22:57**

James Blast wrote:
Gollum's Cock wrote:But what would the male equivalent of Kate Bush be called
Dead easy, Keith Muff!

Ahem!!!

Posted: **06 Nov 2006, 23:03**

scotty wrote:
James Blast wrote:
Gollum's Cock wrote:But what would the male equivalent of Kate Bush be called
Dead easy, Keith Muff!
Ahem!!!

Oops! Ken Muff

and no, that's not a question Keith!?

Posted: **07 Nov 2006, 12:53**

Badlander wrote:
James Blast wrote:her nips look awfy high up in that pic, not much of a handful by Blast's reckoning
This is a photo from 1978, she was still just a kid then. Plus you must admit that you are very demanding.

Just a kid? How old was she.
I can't stop looking at them.

Posted: **07 Nov 2006, 14:41**

eotunun wrote:
James Blast wrote:her nips look awfy high up in that pic, not much of a handful by Blast's reckoning

Which nips, i can only see one....

Posted: **07 Nov 2006, 16:24**

@ Badass : there are two of them. Look closer.

Purple Light wrote:
Badlander wrote: This is a photo from 1978, she was still just a kid then. Plus you must admit that you are very demanding.
Just a kid? How old was she.
I can't stop looking at them.

Don't worry, you're not doing anything illegal : Kate Bush, b. 30 July 1958.

This photoshoot gave rise to a bit of controversy because you could see her tits.

Posted: **07 Nov 2006, 20:11**

It's 'Spot the Nipple' time again.

and her right booby looks a good bit larger than her left

Heartland

Andrea Eldritch!?

Andrea Eldritch!?