http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 403715.ece
Anyone can guess on their own what i think of this...let me just say that news like this leave me speechless. But this trend has been going on for so long that i don't quite understand myself why...
the direction
- itnAklipse
- Slight Overbomber
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 09 Jun 2003, 08:12
- Location: set adrift
- Contact:
we've got beer and we've got fuel
- Izzy HaveMercy
- The Worlds Greatest Living Belgian
- Posts: 8844
- Joined: 29 Jan 2002, 00:00
- Location: Long Dark Forties
- Contact:
I'd LOVE to have seen the roads on New Year's Eve 1999-2000 if all vehicles would have been driven by computers and robots!
"Turn left, turn right, turn l....KILLKILLKILLKILL!!!"
IZ.
"Turn left, turn right, turn l....KILLKILLKILLKILL!!!"
IZ.
- Badlander
- Overbomber
- Posts: 3566
- Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 20:17
- Location: At the Edge of the Deep Green Sea
And there was significantly more than that in France.markfiend wrote:There were 3,201 road deaths in the UK in 2005.
But will artificial intelligence make people less dumb ? I'm not quite sure.
It may also deprive them of all sense of responsibility. You know : "I didn't do it. My car did."
I'd end this moment to be with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
I was just throwing the figure out there. I can see advantages and disadvantages to "robot cars".
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- bushman*pm
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 11 Feb 2006, 17:21
- Location: THE BLACK HOLE OF LONDON
and while we're at it, take the licences off of all those fcukwits who only use a car 'to get from a to b' AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHH!!!!!
wasting precious fossil fuel as well as space on the highways for those who still get some pleasure from driving/riding!
wasting precious fossil fuel as well as space on the highways for those who still get some pleasure from driving/riding!
LAND ROVER: THE BEAST FOUR BY FOUR BY FEAR! KICKS THE ARSE OFF RICEBURNERS!
- Badlander
- Overbomber
- Posts: 3566
- Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 20:17
- Location: At the Edge of the Deep Green Sea
Duly noted.markfiend wrote:I was just throwing the figure out there. I can see advantages and disadvantages to "robot cars".
I too have mixed feelings about it.
I'd end this moment to be with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
Too effing right. People can point the finger at any number of possible causes for the relentless mindbending gridlock we all probably have to deal with, but in the end it boils down to unnecessary excessive overuse of private transport.bushman*pm wrote:and while we're at it, take the licences off of all those fcukwits who only use a car 'to get from a to b' AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHH!!!!!
wasting precious fossil fuel as well as space on the highways for those who still get some pleasure from driving/riding!
Pick any snarl up, and 9 times out of 10 the vast majority of it will be cars with only one person in them.
If I told them once, I told them a hundred times to put 'Spinal Tap' first and 'Puppet Show' last.
- weebleswobble
- Underneath the Rock
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: 09 Feb 2006, 06:57
- Location: The Bat-Milk Cave
- Contact:
If it's good enough for The Hoff
‎"We will wear some very loud shirts. We will wear some very wrong trousers."
- bushman*pm
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 11 Feb 2006, 17:21
- Location: THE BLACK HOLE OF LONDON
Commander Data displays the latest in 'emotion' programmes!eotunun wrote:More than words can say:
anyway, most gridlock can be cleared by simply removing the bumpers from all Volvo's ( ) and Range Rovers
LAND ROVER: THE BEAST FOUR BY FOUR BY FEAR! KICKS THE ARSE OFF RICEBURNERS!
- markfiend
- goriller of form 3b
- Posts: 21181
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 10:55
- Location: st custards
- Contact:
Remind me never to take the bus with youindy wrote:Can't wait, I would rather [...] get a blowjob [...] on the way to work anyway.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
—Bertrand Russell
—Bertrand Russell
- Obviousman
- Outside the Simian Flock
- Posts: 7090
- Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
- Location: Soon over Babaluma
- Contact:
eotunun wrote:More than words can say:
Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."
In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating:
If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:
1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.
2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.
3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason, you would simply accept this.
4. Occasionally, executing a manoeuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.
5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive-but would run on only five percent of the roads.
6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.
7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.
8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.
9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again, because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.
10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.
- Badlander
- Overbomber
- Posts: 3566
- Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 20:17
- Location: At the Edge of the Deep Green Sea
A classic.Obviousman wrote:Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."
In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating:
If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:
1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.
2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.
3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason, you would simply accept this.
4. Occasionally, executing a manoeuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.
5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive-but would run on only five percent of the roads.
6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.
7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.
8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.
9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again, because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.
10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.
I'd end this moment to be with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
Through morphic oceans I'd lay here with you
I have (in my seven years of driving experience) never had a problem doing any of those whilst behind the wheel. It's just a question of whether or not one has the ability to multitask.indy wrote:Can't wait, I would rather take a nap, get a blowjob, or watch a movie on the way to work anyway.
If this is heaven I'm bailin' out.
- bushman*pm
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 11 Feb 2006, 17:21
- Location: THE BLACK HOLE OF LONDON
Obviousman wrote:eotunun wrote:More than words can say:
Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."
In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating:
If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:
1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.
2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.
3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason, you would simply accept this.
4. Occasionally, executing a manoeuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.
5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive-but would run on only five percent of the roads.
6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.
7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.
8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.
9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again, because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.
10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.
nice to see someone at GM has a sense of humour, shame about using monkeys in crash tests though!
LAND ROVER: THE BEAST FOUR BY FOUR BY FEAR! KICKS THE ARSE OFF RICEBURNERS!
- Obviousman
- Outside the Simian Flock
- Posts: 7090
- Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
- Location: Soon over Babaluma
- Contact:
Monkeys, Americans, ach
- bushman*pm
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 11 Feb 2006, 17:21
- Location: THE BLACK HOLE OF LONDON
hard to tell the difference between them both i knowObviousman wrote:Monkeys, Americans, ach
one has slightly more intelligence than the other..........
LAND ROVER: THE BEAST FOUR BY FOUR BY FEAR! KICKS THE ARSE OFF RICEBURNERS!
- Obviousman
- Outside the Simian Flock
- Posts: 7090
- Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
- Location: Soon over Babaluma
- Contact:
EDIT Hope this one works better
Last edited by Obviousman on 26 Feb 2007, 18:52, edited 1 time in total.
- bushman*pm
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 11 Feb 2006, 17:21
- Location: THE BLACK HOLE OF LONDON
Directory has no index file.Obviousman wrote:
Browsing this site or directory without an index file is prohibited.
If you are the site's webmaster, you can remedy this problem by creating a default HTML page with one of the following names:
* index.html
* index.htm
* default.htm
* Default.htm
* home.html
* Home.chtml
NOTE: Filenames are case sensitive, i.e., Home.html is not the same as home.html
if only you knew just how much i hate computers at times!
LAND ROVER: THE BEAST FOUR BY FOUR BY FEAR! KICKS THE ARSE OFF RICEBURNERS!
- Obviousman
- Outside the Simian Flock
- Posts: 7090
- Joined: 22 Aug 2004, 12:14
- Location: Soon over Babaluma
- Contact:
Better?
- bushman*pm
- Utterly Bastard Groovy Amphetamine Filth
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 11 Feb 2006, 17:21
- Location: THE BLACK HOLE OF LONDON
Obviousman wrote:Better?
LAND ROVER: THE BEAST FOUR BY FOUR BY FEAR! KICKS THE ARSE OFF RICEBURNERS!