New Michael Moore Film
Posted: 18 Jun 2007, 06:11
If you wanna catch this, it's on Google Video :
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 4032752909
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 4032752909
Hmm. Not having to worry 24/7 that a major (or in my current financial situation, even a minor) illness will wipe me out financially and leave me utterly destitute sounds like paradise to me.indy wrote:It was okay but my main beef is that is really over glorifies the health systems in the UK, France, and Canada and acts like it's some paradise in those countries.
I lived in Canada for awhile and know it's not all good, me and my wife watched it together, and especially the part about Canadian health care and how fast they are treated left us both going that's bull. Last time I was in a Canadian hospital I had to wrap my bloody hand up with toilet paper from the bathroom because no one would help me.....twelve hours later I was finally helped and most likely I was skipped over because I was not French Canadian (this was in Quebec and French get preferred treatment).SINsister wrote:Hmm. Not having to worry 24/7 that a major (or in my current financial situation, even a minor) illness will wipe me out financially and leave me utterly destitute sounds like paradise to me. :evil: :evil: :evil:indy wrote:It was okay but my main beef is that is really over glorifies the health systems in the UK, France, and Canada and acts like it's some paradise in those countries.
Because Moore's accuracy/honesty are always taken to task, I plan to do some independent research of my own into these countries' policies regarding health care for non-citizens...
It can't be done in the US. As it stands now, entitlement spending (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid) will, by about 2040, account for over 100% of Federal revenue. In other words, these programs already spend more than they take in, and making up the shortfall in revenues for these programs will eventually require more than the sum total of Federal revenues (these numbers come from the Social Security Trustees annual report, i.e., from the Social Security Administration itself). They are not fiscally solvent--adding another entitlement, like W's prescription drug coverage a few years back, just makes the coming financial implosion that much more imminent. If you are an American under age 50 now, start planning for your retirement on your own, because Social Security simply will not be there. Oh, and for the record, we already do pay for the poor to have cheap healthcare. That's what Medicaid does. If you really want cheaper healthcare in this country, you need some sort of tort reform that prohibits frivolous lawsuits. American healthcare prices are inflated because malpractice insurance has gotten so expensive, malpractice insurance is so expensive because our legal system allows frivolous lawsuits to go ahead, and the often amount to a question of playing financial chicken, i.e., it will often be cheaper to settle out of court than it will be to successfully fight the suit. What is needed is a legal reformation that protects the interest of the patient (by allowing for legitimate malpractice suits) while also protecting the interest of the pysician and his/her insurer by preventing nuisance or frivolous lawsuits from coming to trial. If that happens, market forces would drive down the cost of malpractice insurance, and that in turn would go a long way toward making medical care more affordable.indy wrote: Something has to be done it's just that we are to cheap as a nation to pay for it since it's more important to drive a new car or have a bigger house and no one wants to pay for minorities or the poor to have free health care (which is what it really comes down to).
Did you actually read what I wrote? It's neither a rant nor is it "pro U.S. health care system." Or are we going to argue about nothing again? Honestly, I really don't want to do that. I'm sorry for your losses, but please don't make me the whipping boy for them.SINsister wrote:I'm really not interested in hearing any pro-U.S. health care system rants, thanks.
Sorry, sultan - my comment wasn't directed at you. See Indy's post...sultan2075 wrote:Did you actually read what I wrote? It's neither a rant nor is it "pro U.S. health care system." Or are we going to argue about nothing again? Honestly, I really don't want to do that. I'm sorry for your losses, but please don't make me the whipping boy for them.SINsister wrote:I'm really not interested in hearing any pro-U.S. health care system rants, thanks.
Oh, my misunderstanding. Mucho sorry.SINsister wrote:Sorry, sultan - my comment wasn't directed at you. See Indy's post...sultan2075 wrote:Did you actually read what I wrote? It's neither a rant nor is it "pro U.S. health care system." Or are we going to argue about nothing again? Honestly, I really don't want to do that. I'm sorry for your losses, but please don't make me the whipping boy for them.SINsister wrote:I'm really not interested in hearing any pro-U.S. health care system rants, thanks.
I'm not planning on arguing about this issue at all - that's what I was trying to make clear.