live performance copyright
Posted: 27 Sep 2007, 13:50
Just a quick question (particulary for those who are in a band) if you play a cover live (like say, the Sisters do Jolene) do you need to pay the original copyright holder?
well they come on forums like this one, introduce them as being a nice chap and start digging into the weeding section untill they have gathered all the necessary boots with covers on itPetseri wrote:Rule of thumb: the venue has to deal with royalties. Please do not ask how copyright holders know which songs are played at venues.
stefan moermans wrote:well they come on forums like this one, introduce them as being a nice chap and start digging into the weeding section untill they have gathered all the necessary boots with covers on itPetseri wrote:Rule of thumb: the venue has to deal with royalties. Please do not ask how copyright holders know which songs are played at venues.
It is indeed done that way. However, SOME bands fill them out and omit the cover versionsDOZMEISTER wrote:Most bands fill in a PRS (performing rights society) form with the setlist they played. This gets sent off and the PRS pay royalties to the songwriters..... I think thats it anyway!
Does this mean that the PRS (potentially) have the setlist for every UK gig ever?DOZMEISTER wrote:Most bands fill in a PRS (performing rights society) form with the setlist they played. This gets sent off and the PRS pay royalties to the songwriters..... I think thats it anyway!
I've never seen such a thing..however, doesn't mean they don't exist.DOZMEISTER wrote:Most bands fill in a PRS (performing rights society) form with the setlist they played. This gets sent off and the PRS pay royalties to the songwriters..... I think thats it anyway!
i've never filled out or seen one of those eitherSyberberg wrote:IIRC, the set list submission form is for dj's, not bands.
All over Europe and the US we have been asked to fill out these forms, we just tend to be forgetful with other people's songsQuiff Boy wrote:i've never filled out or seen one of those eitherSyberberg wrote:IIRC, the set list submission form is for dj's, not bands.
i always assumed it was covered by the same ents. license fee you mention above, and is the concern of the venue....
yep and yepDark wrote:I think technically bands are meant to pay for the covers they perform live. Though none ever do, or ever will.
According to the PRS, venues are charged 3% of the box office receipts.Any live performance of music by an orchestra or band and the
playing of sound recordings (eg. tapes, CDs) in the club will be a
public performance for the purposes of copyright infringement and
the person liable to pay any fee by way of copyright licence will be
the proprietor of the club or organiser of the event.
PERFORMING RIGHTS LICENCE:
The PRS will normally grant a licence to any prospective music user,
provided only that the person concerned is prepared to enter into a
standard form of licence contract and pay a standard royalty.
Licences issued by the PRS are in the form of annual contracts
which run from year to year until cancelled by either party. These
are blanket licences which authorise the public performance of any
of the millions of works which PRS controls on behalf of its members
and affiliated societies throughout the world. Royalties payable
vary from time to time as the nature or extent of music usage changes in the premises concerned.
Nope, it's the responsibility of the venue owner or the promoter, ie the holder of the Performance Rights Licence to pay the royalties, which is covered (sic) in the licence fee. Any venue owner who tells you otherwise is trying to scam you and should be dealt with accordingly. With extreme predudice.Dark wrote:I think technically bands are meant to pay for the covers they perform live. Though none ever do, or ever will.