Completely....out there.........
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 15:15
.....................
Page 1 of 1
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 15:26
Can we file you under 'Not Happy'?
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 15:39
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 16:45
..............
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 16:49
...........
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 23:23
"I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and think things over."
Serious answer: it would be nice if it was up to us, but it ain't, it's entirely in the hands of
and the members concerned. And anyway, some of us think Hussmonster was bad for the band, some of us think Pearson was bad for the band, some of us dislike everything post-88 (or -85, or even -83). End result is nothing is gonna please everybody. Go figure, indeed. 
Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 23:27
...and you're still alive, coherent, and posting?!DasPerltAber wrote:You can file me under......have 3 e's, 2 gramms of blow, some amphs, 4 litres of beer and some weed for good measure........and no...I am NOT happy.......
Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 20:46
i have to say that live the two current incumbents are excellent. and both are thoroughly sound blokes.
beyond that, until there is another aspect of their membershp to assess -ie songwriting credits on the never gonna surface new album- i don't see what the problem is. what's done is done and i doubt any of the past guitarists would be able to persuade von into a recording studio(mr. marx, bless him, tried to no avail.)
beyond that, until there is another aspect of their membershp to assess -ie songwriting credits on the never gonna surface new album- i don't see what the problem is. what's done is done and i doubt any of the past guitarists would be able to persuade von into a recording studio(mr. marx, bless him, tried to no avail.)
Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 21:21
I second what Lee said...
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 02:32
Well personally I love every single one of the past members for being involved in some way or another in giving to us what we love to this very day. 
Aside from that, Mr POST poster, U might as well calm it coz neither you, nor I, nor the other fine peeps on here can do a damn thing about it.
Aside from that, Mr POST poster, U might as well calm it coz neither you, nor I, nor the other fine peeps on here can do a damn thing about it.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 02:50
There has never been a weak Sisters line-up IMHO and all of the various incarnations have contributed something to the heritage.
I would've loved to have seen the Marx/Hussey/Adams line-up, but I was too young...
I would've loved to have seen the Marx/Hussey/Adams line-up, but I was too young...
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 13:03
^^absolutely every single word of wot 'e said^^Scardwel wrote:There has never been a weak Sisters line-up IMHO and all of the various incarnations have contributed something to the heritage.
I would've loved to have seen the Marx/Hussey/Adams line-up, but I was too young...
Posted: 07 Jan 2008, 14:00
Forgive me previous postings.........it was a matter of utterly bastard wrongly mix and match........
Posted: 12 Jan 2008, 22:06
...and you didn't invited us?DasPerltAber wrote:You can file me under......have 3 e's, 2 gramms of blow, some amphs, 4 litres of beer and some weed for good measure........and no...I am NOT happy.......
Posted: 12 Jan 2008, 22:13
...and Eldo....Scardwel wrote: Marx/Hussey/Adams line-up
their best line-up ...IMHO
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 18:06
............
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 18:25
..........
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 21:56
DasPerltAber is Ez!
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 21:59
Omigod, you're right! 
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 22:05
EZ who?
Posted: 26 Jul 2008, 23:20
Is this thread in code or something?
Posted: 26 Jul 2008, 23:24
Dear motherfucking christ. I think.
Posted: 27 Jul 2008, 01:44
E.Z. Goodepsichonaut wrote:EZ who?
