Heartland

Just been listening to this on the radio. It's a 10 category test in which you "find out" your perceived dating eligibility value. You're then meant to rate people you fancy/possible dates and if their score is +/- 2 from yours then it's more likely to work out.
Hope that makes sense!
Thought it would be fun to try it here .

Here's the 10 categories, mark yourself out of 10 and then give us your final score

Perceived attractiveness (how attractive others think you are)
Perceived wealth (how wealthy others think you are)
Perceived personality/how fun you are/social engagement (how fun others think you are)
Perceived social desirability (whether you're someone that people always want to invite to their gatherings/parties/etc).
Perceived style (how stylish other people think you are)
IQ
Emotional intelligence (how in control of emotions you are/how emotionally self aware you are)
Perceived kindness/generosity
How rebellious you are (unconventionality)
Perceived social liability (baggage)

N.B. The last category should be a case of the lower the better, thus lowering your final score. So if you have low baggage give yourself a higher score, and if you have lots of baggage then give yourself a lower score for that category.

10 is the lowest possible total, 100 is the highest. I scored 65.

Umm... That test doesn't make tooo much sense, you know?
How should I possibly know how others perceive me
As a safe default value, I guess I average ten.

robertzombie wrote:10 is the lowest possible total, 100 is the highest. I scored 65.

Mmm interesting idea. Like you I would like to think I scored in the 60s ...

Perhaps it would be more fun to score each other?

reactiv8 wrote:Perhaps it would be more fun to score each other?

And it'd make more sense too I guess! Hard to score yourself, I think most would either over- or underestimate themselves.

Obviousman wrote:

reactiv8 wrote:Perhaps it would be more fun to score each other?

And it'd make more sense too I guess! Hard to score yourself, I think most would either over or underestimate themselves.

Let's do it then?!

Go ahead

You first

boudicca wrote:You first

OK, bearing in mind that I've never met any of my illustrious peers in the real world, I'll venture a 90 for Sinsister as I have seen a photo of her, she is undoubtedly a genius and most importantly she is our Hostess with the Mostest ...

I was going to put forth a zero for myself on all counts, actually.

Then again, I'm not really interested in how others perceive me, as I consider their opinions to be generally irrelevant.

By the way, flattery will get you nowhere, sir.

SINsister wrote:I was going to put forth a zero for myself on all counts, actually.

Then again, I'm not really interested in how others perceive me, as I consider their opinions to be generally irrelevant.

By the way, flattery will get you nowhere, sir.

Silly me that should have read: 09

reactiv8 wrote:

SINsister wrote:I was going to put forth a zero for myself on all counts, actually.

Then again, I'm not really interested in how others perceive me, as I consider their opinions to be generally irrelevant.

By the way, flattery will get you nowhere, sir.

Silly me that should have read: 09

Makes no difference either way, innit.

I surrender.

reactiv8 wrote:I surrender.

Huh?

Sorry for my inappropriate outburst there, folks.

Please carry on!

So who is dating who within HL and how do you rate each other?

That should get it going...

I've got one coming soon with Hom-Corleone & Obviousman.

Hom I've never met before so will get back to you on that one.

Obviousman ~

Perceived attractiveness ~ not bad looking and tall ~ 8
Perceived wealth ~ hand always on the pocket to pay ~ 9 (student)
Perceived personality/how fun you are/social engagement ~ 10
Perceived social desirability ~ 10
Perceived style ~ 10 *umbrella and all*
IQ ~ very high.
Emotional intelligence ~ 10
Perceived kindness/generosity ~ 10
How rebellious you are (unconventionality)~ he's goth as hell!
Perceived social liability (baggage) ~ he has no baggage as i know it and brings masses with him



Next....

Perceived attractiveness (how attractive others think you are) = 4
Perceived wealth (how wealthy others think you are)=8
Perceived personality/how fun you are/social engagement (how fun others think you are) = 6
Perceived social desirability (whether you're someone that people always want to invite to their gatherings/parties/etc) = 5
Perceived style (how stylish other people think you are) =0
IQ =5
Emotional intelligence (how in control of emotions you are/how emotionally self aware you are) =0
Perceived kindness/generosity =10
How rebellious you are (unconventionality) =5
Perceived social liability (baggage) =0

Ok?

Good morning, Jum. The night with you was terific.

1. i'm a shorty, but girls tellin' me i'm pretty (so) ~ 5.5
2. i'm a student, currently jobless, and rather spending money on gigs and CD's ~ 4
3. i'm so fecking hilarious, but seriously peeps catch my drift if i want to be funny ~9
4. peeps don't wanna see me so much ~ 4
5. duuno i'm always de mode, stopped to pretending being in/on any subculture, but i know what to wear, so ~ 10
6. 8
7. because i'm talking about myself~ 10 :mrgreen:
8. i'm very kind, i'm still didn't kill anyone ~10
9. i'm avoiding gathering (not including gigs) 7
10. ?

eotunun wrote: Good morning, Jum. The night with you was terific.

I'm a bit bloody worried here as four of my exes (that would be all of them then, except for the boy I went out with for a couple of weeks in 3rd Year who turned out to be A Gay anyway) are Heartland members...

Now that's a bit too close for comfort...

Claire, I don't think you have to worry my dear.

SINsister wrote:

Now that's a bit too close for comfort...

It's surreal and mondo amusing at turns

MadameButterfly wrote:Claire, I don't think you have to worry my dear.

But they do!

boudicca wrote:

MadameButterfly wrote:Claire, I don't think you have to worry my dear.

But they do!

Okay I do understand...