pre92 SOM Video Trades Welcome | New 2007 updates
Posted: 26 Feb 2008, 20:55
The Sisters of Mercy Forum
https://myheartland.co.uk/
if it is on the version that everybody has then yes, otherwise no. I didn't watch the whole thing, just skipped through it and c&p'ed the set list from someone else. any corrections on set lists are greatly appreciated.lachert wrote:are you sure there is amphetamine logic on your version of 1985/07/18 UK | London, Royal Albert Hall 60 min?
so what would be the correct set list if you don't mind me asking? I'd like to correct the info on my site.paint it black wrote:i have the master transfer and it isn't on mine, so it won't be on yours
only missing logic, sodummkopf wrote:so what would be the correct set list if you don't mind me asking? I'd like to correct the info on my site.paint it black wrote:i have the master transfer and it isn't on mine, so it won't be on yours
thanks
??paint it black wrote:there's a lovely little story about legal fights with WEA, bouncers and crew
let me guess, WEA claimed exclusive recording rights and hassled the filmer even though the band was cool with it. so did the bouncers and crew working the RAH. either because of WEA's claim or because of a general 'no taping' policy at that venue. unfortunately it is quite common in major venues to have a 'no taping' or 'pay to tape' policy.paint it black wrote:there's a lovely little story about legal fights with WEA, bouncers and crew