Heartland

Yesterday i was listen burn from 1983-09-01 Odeon Münster, and in a bizarre Coincidence in shuffle mode, the song before burn 83 it's...burn 06(i don't know where it's from, i just rip the audio from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-Uc5iE5wQY), anyway, so finally i see a BIG riff diference, and i just...love it! this new burn its so good then the original, and u guys, what u think about the 'new' burn riffs?

Did someone here some time ago describe it as "menacing" and was it itnAklipse, or is my memory playing tricks on me? Anyway - I couldn't agree more with that.

Indeed i did. And still agree with it, too

Effin powerful.

That said, the old version is "effin" good too.
It's the song that has the whole essence of The Sisters in it, in my opinion.

Couldn't agree more with that, either My slight preferance at the moment is only due to the fact that i've heard the old version 5000 times and the newer one only less than a hundred.

You must be one of the few people who actually listen to their collection, then.

itnAklipse wrote:Couldn't agree more with that, either My slight preferance at the moment is only due to the fact that i've heard the old version 5000 times and the newer one only less than a hundred.

Same here... oh yes, and because the new one's too bloody short

i don't believe in museums or archival libraries

Husek wrote:Yesterday i was listen burn from 1983-09-01 Odeon Münster, and in a bizarre Coincidence in shuffle mode, the song before burn 83 it's...burn 06(i don't know where it's from, i just rip the audio from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-Uc5iE5wQY), anyway, so finally i see a BIG riff diference, and i just...love it! this new burn its so good then the original, and u guys, what u think about the 'new' burn riffs?

... and if you thought that version was good

itnAklipse wrote:i don't believe in museums or archival libraries

and yet they exist

I slightly prefer the Amsterdam 2003 version.

The new one is very fine indeed, but suffers from "the Von effect" (only play half the song, see Lucretia, Temple). A full length version would be stunning.

and shabby rent-a-Floodlandalike keyboard snouds, eurggghhh so cold!

Ozpat wrote:I slightly prefer the Amsterdam 2003 version.

Can u share it with us =3?

You really don't want anything from the 2003 tour (of fed-up-ness) apart from the Leeds gigs.

Trust me.

Husek wrote:

Ozpat wrote:I slightly prefer the Amsterdam 2003 version.

Can u share it with us =3?

If I am right the gig is available in the weeding section.
Otherwise PM me.

@ Mc Blaast: Bollocks!

Could someone explain the difference to me between the 2 versions?(except for the powerchords, i got that)

PipoTheClown wrote:Could someone explain the difference to me between the 2 versions?(except for the powerchords, i got that)

Powerchords in intro riff
just 2 ou 3 minutes of music...

I still don't think I found one to better that opening version in Brighton 84.
Maybe it's just "first gig/ first love" & all that, but I still can't find one to beat it.

Original Burn might be the coolest song they ever penned down. When I heard the new version I think I came multiple times.

'Menacing' is a good term'. Now if they just made it as long as 'Neverland-full version' I could die a happy man.

IZ.

live burn circa '84/'85:
proper tempo,
full drum intro,
riff/vocal verse/vocal chorus not riff/instro. verse/instro chorus/ vocal verse; two gittars no synths.

oh yeah, and andy could still sing it then.

It's a pity Andy never sang the backward vocal parts live ...

at myself

I'd have paid money to see that.

So, we are already talking about the new burn...did someone have a guitar tab for this new intro ?

I've only got Burn live twice on the 2006 tour, the youtube version sounds like 11th May 2006 - Brussels , but could be 7th April 2006 - Madrid. Good quality track though. I like it a lot