Page 1 of 2
Anybody seen this?
Posted: 28 Apr 2009, 21:52
by Caravaggio
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0iQLXfRNKU
(I don't like VT too, but ... well... maybe he's right...maybe not...I think he doesn't understand the Sisters, hasn't he?...anyway, who is this a**hole?)
Posted: 28 Apr 2009, 21:58
by LouLou
funny he doesn't have a problem with ranting on about a "s**t" album for an entire 10 minutes.
if it's that "s**t", surely it's not worth wasting any breath on?
Posted: 28 Apr 2009, 22:00
by 17.auflage
OK, VT isn´t my fav, but what is this guy talking about!
Posted: 28 Apr 2009, 22:24
by dinky daisy
Stop watching the YouTube link, his 21 views are 21 too many.
Posted: 28 Apr 2009, 22:48
by Being645
Posted: 29 Apr 2009, 00:28
by AdrenaChris
Matey can't even review properly, "it sounds like a bad movie"...well "Ribbons" is a fantastic tune, so there goes this guy's reviewing credibility
Posted: 29 Apr 2009, 08:02
by deadagain
VT is third on my list of fav Sisters albums, but listening to that review only makes me like it more.
The reviewer is a retard, has nothing intelligent to say, and says it with a seriously nauseating accent.
Enough said.
Posted: 29 Apr 2009, 09:20
by Bartek
that at least embarrassing.
Posted: 29 Apr 2009, 11:21
by eotunun
"Emabarrassing" is a compliment for that.
Posted: 29 Apr 2009, 12:06
by Back in time
I can take a criticism if there are any good arguments behind it, but this is just too much.
Posted: 29 Apr 2009, 12:57
by Bartek
eotunun wrote:"Emabarrassing" is a compliment for that.
that why o wrote "at least"
Posted: 29 Apr 2009, 23:50
by 7anthea7
So why hasn't anyone but me posted a comment there?
Feckin' muttonhead...
Posted: 30 Apr 2009, 00:18
by lachert
7anthea7 wrote:So why hasn't anyone but me posted a comment there?
Feckin' muttonhead...
you've got mine
Posted: 30 Apr 2009, 00:20
by iesus
No need to post there...
Just Report the clip for Abusive content as i did
Posted: 30 Apr 2009, 02:11
by 7anthea7
iesus wrote:No need to post there...
Just Report the clip for Abusive content as i did
I doubt they'll take it down - there are
many things on YouTube that are
much worse.
It really has to be illegal, obscene or legally actionable before they'll do anything.
Posted: 30 Apr 2009, 08:31
by iesus
and copyrights?
VT material must have licence to be published over internet
Also there is a matter of "Hatefull and Abusive content" and i think we all agree in this...
That malakas hates our favourite band and abuses our soul and mind with these garbages....
Even if someone don't likes something, he never creates such vids and publish them in that way...
Posted: 30 Apr 2009, 09:04
by 7anthea7
iesus wrote:and copyrights?
That would come under 'legally actionable' - but copyrighted material is uploaded all the time. The holder of the copyright has to make the complaint.
And also wrote:Also there is a matter of "Hatefull and Abusive content" and i think we all agree in this...
No argument from me about that. But they also permit all kinds of what I personally consider gawdawfully nasty stuff.
About the only thing that counts is something that abuses a class of people (by race, nationality, gender, sexual inclination...) that could get them in legal difficulty. I seriously doubt they're worried about TSOM fans bringing a class action suit against them...
Posted: 30 Apr 2009, 09:24
by iesus
We Are Intellectual Good Music Lovers, A Whole Clan of our own, aren't we?
Posted: 30 Apr 2009, 15:54
by Being645
Ach, ja ... and by the way ... have you perceived the voice of this person and the way he talks?
Phh ... that speaks for itself ... and might rather induce the children to have a more closer look at what this person is trying to devaluate ...
So let him proceed ... he won't get anywhere, anyway ...
Posted: 30 Apr 2009, 17:31
by despair
Being645 wrote:Ach, ja ... and by the way ... have you perceived the voice of this person and the way he talks?
Phh ... that speaks for itself ...
Yep, most likely a clueless moron. 1 minute of this "review" was more than enough for me.
The first time I heard Vision Thing 10-12 years ago it didn't appeal to me at all, simply because it wasn't the kind of music I was looking for. Now I realize that it's actually a damn good album. It helps a lot when you don't expect/want it to be something specific, but this "reviewer" is probably beyond hope regardless.
Douche-Bag on Youtube
Posted: 01 May 2009, 01:11
by DrG
despair wrote:Yep, most likely a clueless moron.
Oh aye! No sense of what the Sisters are all about. I posted a
response on youtube after listening to this tripe!
Posted: 01 May 2009, 12:28
by 242headhunter
If he reviews FALAA like this i'm not responsible for my actions
Posted: 01 May 2009, 13:00
by Caravaggio
242headhunter wrote:If he reviews FALAA like this i'm not responsible for my actions
Count me in!
Re: Douche-Bag on Youtube
Posted: 01 May 2009, 13:50
by despair
DrG wrote:Oh aye! No sense of what the Sisters are all about. I posted a response on youtube after listening to this tripe!
Strangely enough, the guy actually says he agree with what you wrote
Re: Douche-Bag on Youtube
Posted: 01 May 2009, 14:36
by 7anthea7
despair wrote:DrG wrote:Oh aye! No sense of what the Sisters are all about. I posted a response on youtube after listening to this tripe!
Strangely enough, the guy actually says he agree with what you wrote
More proof that he's an idiot...