Page 1 of 4
Rise Of The Machines
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 09:38
by Silver_Owl
Now that Chris's star is very much in the ascendency, do we (the people) assume The Sisters as a living breathing organism are a thing of the past.
It looks like Chris will have less and less time to spend on The Sisters.
Will
call it a day or try and recruit a new full time member or is he happy with the arrangement?
Just a stream of consciousness rant, that's all.
DISCUSS.
Cue replies of - They've been a thing of the past for years etc....
Re: Rise Of The Machines
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 10:18
by markfiend
Hom_Corleone wrote:It looks like Chris will have less and less time to spend on The Sisters.
I don't know that that's necessarily the case. Chris has always struck me as the kind of guy who's happiest when he's busiest. I'm sure he'll find time for a month or so every couple of years.
It's not as if the Sisters actually
need "full-time members" is it?
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 10:19
by mh
I think Chris is like the Duracell bunny, he could probably do at least 3 or 4 other projects. Maybe each of the Sisters and the Machines fulfils something for him that the other doesn't?
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 10:59
by Quiff Boy
aye, wot they said ^
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 11:03
by Silver_Owl
It was just a thought I had last night when I was walking the dogs.
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 12:10
by Bartek
it's true- Chris seeems to need to be a part of few projects just look at his band history. and it's also true that the sisters dosen't need full time member because it's just a touring band, ye know cat food and etc.
and as we see Chris did more than just playing guitar doing back-voc, bouncing and jumping on stage (still, arms).
he is one of the best thing that happend to the sisters since 1993, imo.
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 14:04
by paint it black
Bartek wrote:it's true- Chris seeems to need to be a part of few projects just look at his band history. and it's also true that the sisters dosen't need full time member because it's just a touring band, ye know cat food and etc.
and as we see Chris did more than just playing guitar doing back-voc, bouncing and jumping on stage (still, arms).
he is one of the best thing that happend to the sisters since 1993, imo.
Chris is the sisters, he runs the show*. the old guy just turns up and mumbles occasionally
arranges tours, merch, itinary etc
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 14:31
by markfiend
paint it black wrote:Chris is the sisters, he runs the show*. the old guy just turns up and mumbles occasionally
arranges tours, merch, itinary etc
etc, eh?
Joking aside, I think you've pretty much hit the nail here.
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 14:41
by abridged
Ah have to disagree
is to the Sisters as to what Morrissey was to The Smiths. Both had/has great guitarists, but the Smiths don't exist wouthout Morrissey and the Sisters wouldn't exist without
...
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 15:06
by Aazhyd
He doesn't have to be bothered to record anything, like a new Sisters album, so he has lots of free time. Only the occasional gig with old sunglasses.
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 19:31
by Being645
abridged wrote:Ah have to disagree
is to the Sisters as to what Morrissey was to The Smiths. Both had/has great guitarists, but the Smiths don't exist without Morrissey and the Sisters wouldn't exist without
...
absolutely seconded ... and The Sisters of Mercy is surely more than
some touring the new millennium with "old" songs and "young" guitarists ...
sometimes, however, I wonder whether they are aware ...
...
Re: Rise Of The Machines
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 20:11
by Erudite
Hom_Corleone wrote:
Will
call it a day
If only we were that lucky...
Idol... feet of clay... etc.
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 20:15
by James Blast
more like mince
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 20:25
by Erudite
James Blast wrote:more like mince
Only if one were to chop them up!
Re: Rise Of The Machines
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 20:29
by MadameButterfly
Erudite wrote:Hom_Corleone wrote:
Will
call it a day
If only we were that lucky...
Idol... feet of clay... etc.
If
does call it a day then that's the end of TSOM that we know.
Chris now in the band only has it plus points all the way but seriously if there is no lead man there is no real sisters.
I'm sure
is not feeling that old yet to call it a day anyway!
Re: Rise Of The Machines
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 20:34
by Erudite
MadameButterfly wrote:
If
does call it a day then that's the end of TSOM
Precisely.
But the records are still fantastic and the t-shirts rock!
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 20:34
by James Blast
he kens he can serve 25 year old cold mince to a new generation 'cause they will eat it and blindly ask for more
"What have they done to my Rock n'Roll"
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 20:36
by MadameButterfly
James Blast wrote:he kens he can serve 25 year old cold mince to a new generation 'cause they will eat it and blindly ask for more
"What have they done to my Rock n'Roll"
That's called what legends are made of.
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 20:54
by Being645
James Blast wrote:he kens he can serve 25 year old cold mince to a new generation 'cause they will eat it and blindly ask for more
"What have they done to my Rock n'Roll"
... He doesn't.
and apart from that, it is commonly known that the kids are
regularly more intelligent than the elderly please to assume ...
...
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 21:21
by James Blast
"many a truer word spoke in jest"
not on this occasion
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 21:40
by MadameButterfly
says the post counting whore who doesn't even go to gigs anymore
Posted: 10 Dec 2009, 09:26
by Bartek
who said that the sisters could be call the sisters without Von ?
but.
who thinks that the sisters are more than just touring band nowadays, flogging this very old and tired horse, doing nothing more than just visiting few country for lets say off-break activity ? than it's just a way to collect money for retirement/cat food ?
anyhow it is he/she is just WRONG.
we'll see just a young chaps haveing a good time on stage and being on lift up for their own 'career' and just btw. for most of you festival of remembrance.
i think that i moved meself to JB group - people who does not bother of this so-called band. anymore. and really.
Posted: 10 Dec 2009, 10:15
by _emma_
Ha ha.
I've just remembered the majority of initial reactions about Chris joining the band a couple of years ago.
How funny are some of the things that time brings.
Thank God good old AE is still the only certain and incontestable part of it all.
Posted: 10 Dec 2009, 10:20
by Silver_Owl
_emma_ wrote:
How funny are some of the things that time brings.
Indeed.
I'm glad this thread has raised some interesting debate.
Posted: 10 Dec 2009, 10:41
by _emma_
I just hope they both Chris and Ben stay in the band for as long as possible, because they are good and it would be difficult to find somebody equally good to replace them. Not impossible probably, because the world is full of good and skilled and talented guitar players, but these two seem to have the kind of personalities that fit in that band very well these days.