Page 1 of 10

"New" Box-Set

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 11:49
by vicus

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 12:17
by Being645
So there will be more people soon to buy the new records and visit the concerts ... ;D ...

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 13:03
by Ozpat
:eek: :urff:

Well, as a collector I will probably buy it anyway. :|

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 13:25
by Silence is platinum
there s a similar psychedelic furs box available as well. Nothing realy to write home about.

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 14:29
by Bartek
Ozpat wrote:Well, as a collector I will probably buy it anyway. :|
you must be joking, aren't you ?

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 14:33
by robertzombie
The Psychedelic Furs box has bonus tracks on each CD ;)

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 15:10
by lachert
wtf? :eek: i understand singles collection 80-93 or something but this, again?

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 19:23
by Rise891
I guess as long as there is nothing new, just keep re-releasing the same old stuff till there is no demand.

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 21:28
by christophe
if it would have hold 'Gift' I might have had to think about it but this is just sad :(


is this stuff all old stock? because if it isn't I don't see why not releasing new material, I'm sure it would see about the same amount if not more ... and what fans are still out there who could be disappointed?
if they would sell a frakking tsom scarf it would sell, oh wait they did :roll:

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 23:43
by jande
christophe wrote: if they would sell a frakking tsom scarf it would sell, oh wait they did :roll:
Don't knock it, it's keeping my neck warm :lol:

Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 23:52
by Silver_Owl
jande wrote:
christophe wrote: if they would sell a frakking tsom scarf it would sell, oh wait they did :roll:
Don't knock it, it's keeping my neck warm :lol:
I'm wishing I bought one now what with this infernal cold and all. :evil:

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 00:06
by Prescott
Hmmm? It does not say if it is the three re-releases from 2006 plus SGWBM and ASCOOB or the standard versions. It would make a difference. Then one would be getting many of the B-sides as well. It would make a nice gift for someone just getting into the Sisters either way. ;)

Yet we all know what we would really rather have, don't we?

;)

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 00:10
by MadameButterfly
you bunch of ...



























..fans?
















good god above or within or wherever ... how sad Andrew E ...


















... make yourself rich and famous again old man with the sexy bod! :wink:






















and rock the summer of 2010! PLEASE!
get hold of the HL group of know hows and create a new album, release it and make yourself rich and us happy!



















it's easy as pie!



















:wink: :twisted:

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 07:29
by Ozpat
Bartek wrote:
Ozpat wrote:Well, as a collector I will probably buy it anyway. :|
you must be joking, aren't you ?
Ofcourse not! ;D

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 09:37
by numan
is it the continue of this series?:

http://eil.com/shop/moreinfo.asp?catalogid=449597

MadameButterfly wrote: and create a new album, release it and make yourself rich and us happy! :wink: :twisted:
or, at least, a proper autobiography book! :P

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 11:20
by 17.auflage
it´s nearly like we ´d had a dead artist, isn´t it.
Always repeating the same stuff ind different forms. Again and again and again....so what´s next?

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 11:25
by Silver_Owl
17.auflage wrote:it´s nearly like we ´d had a dead artist, isn´t it.
Always repeating the same stuff ind different forms. Again and again and again....so what´s next?
Are you starting a rumour? :von: is dead? :innocent:

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 12:53
by Bartek
as a artist he's dead for quite a long time.
to be precise, i don't see a results of his work, 9 lyrics and 1 song(music) per 9 years is not enough.
of course quality over quantity but at least few of this songs (will i dream, still and slept) are so weak that shouldn't be written by this band.

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 12:59
by dinky daisy
I can't believe it. I would rather buy the latest remastered discography from Starship, Heart and Kansas in one shopping bag.

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 13:06
by _emma_
MadameButterfly wrote:good god above or within or wherever ... how sad Andrew E ...
I suppose it has little to do with him, as was the case with the previous re-releases. Come on, if he can't be bothered to record a new album, why would he be bothered to re-release the previous ones? :roll: :lol:

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 13:14
by Quiff Boy
exactly.

the repackaging is absolutely nothing to do with him. it's yet another record label cash-in...

it's been done a few times before with sisters material, and a million times before for every other band (the beatles ffs!)

the artist has no say in any of it.

don't be so quick to judge him ;)

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 13:18
by Bartek
that's ^ at leat true. mr AE has nothing to do with that but in the other hands he probalby has nothing against it. what's good or his cats is good for him.

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 13:39
by markfiend
As I recall he said he didn't get a penny from the re-issued albums from a couple of years ago.

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 13:47
by taylor
I prefer a reissue than a new effort :D

Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 13:50
by Bartek
obvioulsy i don't know your regulations about this, but i'm quite sure that royalties is something that artist should get/ can demand from each sold copies of his work. it be stupid if it was diferent.