Page 1 of 1

Is that ok?

Posted: 25 Aug 2010, 22:30
by Being645

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 00:23
by lachert
of course not. this is not the first time. looks that gift is the rarest official "the sisters" album so you've got such like this from time to time :evil:

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 07:21
by Izzy HaveMercy
Send an abuse to eBay and this gets pulled.

This is sheer theft.

IZ.

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 10:37
by Being645
Done ... :evil: ... now wait and see ... :roll: ...

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 10:41
by abridged
This aint bootlegging. This is counterfeiting. :evil:

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 11:07
by sisterstekland
reported counterfeiting is useless if the seller does not remove it :?

The alternative for the artist is this: http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/pro ... ro-ov.html so :von: as far as i understand it

http://pages.ebay.com/help/community/NOCI1.pdf

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 12:20
by 17.auflage
wow, including the spelling mistake: Rain Form Heaven.
Think it´s the Aussie Bootleg.


So if you start reporting that, what ´s about the 2009 remakes of the first three 7" Vinyls?

Somewhere in my little head, I do not like the idea of reporting every bootleg...

:innocent:

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 16:46
by Being645
17.auflage wrote:wow, including the spelling mistake: Rain Form Heaven.
Think it´s the Aussie Bootleg.

So if you start reporting that, what ´s about the 2009 remakes of the first three 7" Vinyls?
The 2009 remakes are what is says - remakes ... and as far as I know not a limited to 150 edition ...

Further more, bootlegs are bootlegs and not fake copies of original albums - limited to 150 ... :evil: : :wink: ...


Me neither ... :innocent:

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 17:29
by cardoman
Being645 wrote:
17.auflage wrote:wow, including the spelling mistake: Rain Form Heaven.
Think it´s the Aussie Bootleg.

So if you start reporting that, what ´s about the 2009 remakes of the first three 7" Vinyls?
The 2009 remakes are what is says - remakes ... and as far as I know not a limited to 150 edition ...

Me neither ... :innocent:
But I know they were limited to 1000 each...

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 18:10
by ribbons69
Izzy HaveMercy wrote:Send an abuse to eBay and this gets pulled.

This is sheer theft.

IZ.
Theft from whom? The cd is not currently in print,and cannot be bought new,from anywhere.
Whether you buy a bootleg like this,or a second hand original,makes no difference.
I'm sure if this was a vinyl bootleg,with a green cover,noone would be bothered.

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 19:03
by mh
Doesn't matter if it's in print or not, the legality of it is clear. One might not agree with it on a personal opinion level (and the "how is this different from buying 2nd hand" argument is a good one), but one still has to suck it up.

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 19:32
by ribbons69
Oh,indeed,but then we must surely apply that to the 7" boots of Damage Done etc that are currently available,and any other vinyl "repress"

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 19:58
by 17.auflage
Being645 wrote:
The 2009 remakes are what is says - remakes ... and as far as I know not a limited to 150 edition ...

Further more, bootlegs are bootlegs and not fake copies of original albums - limited to 150 ... :evil: : :wink: ...


Me neither ... :innocent:
Ähem, the so called remakes are also not official, so they are bootlegs too. And i think, they vinyls and the digipak from Gift have the same source. ....

All are not official... so what is the difference from a different so called fake copy and a bootleg?

but so what...

Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 23:57
by Being645
17.auflage wrote:... they vinyls and the digipak from Gift have the same source. ....
I don't think so. It's a long way from Australia to Greece and the business conduct of these two sellers differ remarkably ...


Our Greek fellow comes out with a lot of bootlegs of bootlegs,
all in digital formats, and under at times very funny names ...

Anybody noticed whether his Sisters in Athens 2009 found a buyer?
Unfortunately, I forgot the title and what he demanded for that one ...

Alas, someone had to do some 50 A5 Green Eldritch CDs with a starting bid of 40 € ... 8) ...
although this could never ever make up for an "original" vinyl bootleg ...

thankfully, as far as I know, we've got these data on a harddrive somewhere ... :innocent:

cardoman wrote:
Being645 wrote: The 2009 remakes are what is says - remakes ... and as far as I know not a limited to 150 edition ...
But I know they were limited to 1000 each...
They were, and according to Popsike they were indicated as re-issues
and offered at a starting bid of ca. 10 € for a remake of the three most heroic vinyl singles in The Sisters' history ...

But yeah, of course, we all know the Gift CD is nowhere available, either ... 8) ...


Alas, I've reported him to Ebay for once, I won't do so further ... won't buy any of his stuff, anyway,
since I feel not in the world to pay for his leisure ... Let him fool the ROW ... it's not my business.

Posted: 27 Aug 2010, 09:08
by 17.auflage
The Gift Digi including the spelling mistake comes from australia. It´s just the same thing.

And Posike just copies some information without further knowledgement... :wink: That´s a good source for paid prices, but ....nothing else....
This remakes are boots :roll:

Athens 2009.... :innocent: ???
I am sure we will get it asap to your harddrive next week. :roll:

Posted: 27 Aug 2010, 13:16
by Being645
17.auflage wrote:The Gift Digi including the spelling mistake comes from australia. It´s just the same thing.

And Posike just copies some information without further knowledgement... :wink: That´s a good source for paid prices, but ....nothing else....
This remakes are boots :roll:

Athens 2009.... :innocent: ???
I am sure we will get it asap to your harddrive next week. :roll:

Say what you will ... for me, remakes of official albums remain remakes,
while bootlegs do not include fake copies of original albums ...

You may of course, keep to YHO as well ...



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
... say it in broken English ...

Posted: 27 Aug 2010, 16:16
by 17.auflage
yes. you are right. Of course I am not an expert.
:-)

Posted: 27 Aug 2010, 16:41
by Being645
17.auflage wrote:yes. you are right. Of course I am not an expert.
:-)
oh, thanks ... anýway, I'm sure, you're more of an expert than me ... :wink: :) ... only at times, I can't but ignore all expertise ... :lol: ...