Heartland

As it says

Thanks for your attention.

check your pm´s please!!

Any more infos regarding lineage/runtime?

It's complete, about 85 minutes.

Don't know taper/equipment, it's not from a Sisters trader. Easily after your own efforts the best 2009 video i've seen - not perfect but pretty nice. Good sound, too. Focuses on AE all the time, so has lots more closeups of God than most of your videos

Isn't the drum machine the god part?

Thanks for the info - sounds interesting so i might get back to you via pm during the next days.

itnAklipse wrote:...Easily after your own efforts the best 2009 video i've seen...

Really? I think you need to see more 2009 vids

Some screens for the curious...oh if only the filmer had been 1ft taller

Methedrone wrote:Really? I think you need to see more 2009 vids

Disagreed, i have most of them - you're free to disagree with my opinion, though. Just don't pretend your opinion is better than mine, dick.

But thanks for posting the screens - i could've not done that.

I think it's hard to rate a video because there are many aspects to cosider:

- the "technical" video quality in terms of sharpness, color accuracity, aspect ratio (4:3/16:9), image noise/artefacts
- steadyness
- the ratio between close-ups and long-shots
- any kind of "obstacles" wich are blocking the view like waving hands, heads, too much fog
- audio quality
- DVD authoring

And not to forget:

- how good was the actual concert? A decent recording is not much worth if the actual show was lame.

I think these are the most important criterias wich can't be weightened in a certain way. Most people have (probably) different expectations about these aspects. For my taste I'd weight a vid sort of like this:

30% audio quality
20% good show?
20% steadyness,
10% close-up/long-shot ratio
10% technical
10% obstacles

=100% MotherFucker

Indeed

London93 vs. Hamburg09 came to mind for some reason.. (This is technically better than London93, though, which at times is frustratingly shaky - and yet in that case i don't really mind.)

Yeah - Hamburg 09 was tragic^^

itnAklipse wrote:

Methedrone wrote:Really? I think you need to see more 2009 vids

Disagreed, i have most of them - you're free to disagree with my opinion, though. Just don't pretend your opinion is better than mine, dick.

itnAklipse wrote:But thanks for posting the screens - i could've not done that.

You're welcome. Have some more...these are probably more indicative of the camerawork bearing in mind the filmers position.

Wich tool are you using for making these screener overviews?

Never mind. Maybe i took what M said in slightly wrong way. Sorry, M.