Heartland

I'm trying to get my tape collection sort of even
slightly organised and came across these 2 DAT
tapes.

PC69 is Tape(Master)->DAT
and Tiffanys is Tape(1st Gen)->DAT

both have a fair bit of analog overload on them,
are their any sources that don't knocking about.
My PC69 source is straight from the tape so I
know thats legit for this tape source but I don't
have any real info on the Tiffanys tape.

Anybody ?

thanks

Wayne

are the above from master tape or vinyl source ?

taylor wrote:are the above from master tape or vinyl source ? :?:

yes they were, no vinyl gens in their lineage

isn't Tiffanys 13/03/85?

Does it include Knocking On Heavens Door?

think most copies don't, so that might be of interest!

deadagain wrote:isn't Tiffanys 13/03/85?

Does it include Knocking On Heavens Door?

think most copies don't, so that might be of interest!

not even the alternative audience master source i have

Well, i just think the alternate sources are pretty interesting without imaginary songs Or maybe the elusive video has KOHD on it, too...

Imaginary songs? of course, the sisters would never have played such a song as that, as indeed they didn't on most nights of that tour.

what was i thinking....

@wayne

can you upload them ?

taylor wrote:@wayne

can you upload them ?

depends - what rare uncirculated sources would you be willing to upload in return ?

wayne wrote:

taylor wrote:@wayne

can you upload them ?

depends - what rare uncirculated sources would you be willing to upload in return ?

there are lots of uploaded rarities in the 'sharing' section to choose from!

Perhaps you'd like to offer them up as weeds?

I'm going to pre-emptively jump to wayne's defence here. (Although I'm sure he's fully capable of defending himself.)

I think wayne's made his feelings known on a few occasions about weeding and sharing, particularly on the issue of the seemingly inevitable degradation of quality that accompanies the "life-cycle" of any high-quality recordings whenever they surface.

If wayne doesn't want to release his recordings into general circulation, it's his decision, and I for one think we should respect that.

aye fair enough! was just a suggestion, not an attack or anyfink.

markfiend wrote: on the issue of the seemingly inevitable degradation of quality that accompanies the "life-cycle" of any high-quality recordings whenever they surface.

although this should be relative when you use a good extraction program (i.e. EAC) and quality cdr's (TY,...)

More an issue of compression (mp3)

markfiend wrote:I'm going to pre-emptively jump to wayne's defence here. (Although I'm sure he's fully capable of defending himself.)

I think wayne's made his feelings known on a few occasions about weeding and sharing, particularly on the issue of the seemingly inevitable degradation of quality that accompanies the "life-cycle" of any high-quality recordings whenever they surface.

If wayne doesn't want to release his recordings into general circulation, it's his decision, and I for one think we should respect that.

you're both missing the point:

- look how old the original post is, I'm not goading anybody with what I've got - it was a legitimate question when I first found this place. One person made the effort and helped out back then and he got copies for his trouble.

- look who resurrectee is, known for their community spirit ? Perhaps the gamesmanship was a bit too subtle.

I do share my stuff, there are a few of my tape sources in the weeding section and I've put stuff on dime, but to be honest its a bit of a thankless task. The last few years I've taken to giving recordings directly to people who actually went to the gigs, along with the odd randoms who might be interested, cute goth birds on trains, and people who aren't privy to the world of bootlegs. I get more thanks and a kick out of giving a cd to somebody like that, who had no idea a gig they went to exists than I do watching people, with long lists to maintain, arguing about why they should be given free stuff and at the same time PMing behind the scenes playing the rare trades game.

Many apologies wayne.

Heh. I thought I was defending you, looks like I may have made the situation worse. at myself.

[quote="wayne"]

-
... The last few years I've taken to giving recordings directly to people who actually went to the gigs, along with the odd randoms who might be interested, cute goth birds on trains, and people who aren't privy to the world of bootlegs. I get more thanks and a kick out of giving a cd to somebody like that,..... [quote]


Me too

'ello love, *cough*, you, er, *cough*, interested in a couple of, *wheeze*, sisters bootlegs, eh? eh? *cough* gets you going does it, eh?, eh?

what a top pulling technique!

oh yes, and apologies - i hadn't spotted the date of the original post; and point taken about the resurrectee.....

deadagain wrote:'ello love, *cough*, you, er, *cough*, interested in a couple of, *wheeze*, sisters bootlegs, eh? eh? *cough* gets you going does it, eh?, eh?

what a top pulling technique!

Oh, come on. We've all done it.

smiscandlon wrote:

deadagain wrote:'ello love, *cough*, you, er, *cough*, interested in a couple of, *wheeze*, sisters bootlegs, eh? eh? *cough* gets you going does it, eh?, eh?

what a top pulling technique!

Oh, come on. We've all done it.

TRIED it maybe - you're not saying it actually worked are you? although it did once with the promise of some NMA rarities, crusties *shudder*

Worked for me!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=010

for me this the best quality for this gig

taylor wrote:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=010

for me this the best quality for this gig

so why are you selling it then ?